• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Hillary Clinton calls for U.S. to 'intensify and broaden' efforts to fight ISIS

ReverendHellh0und said:
So she went to places with sand, and saw troops... that's not "military experience". you can also see how she bungled benghazi I am of the opinion she should be as far away from foreign policy as possible.
Click to expand...

What is your definition of military experience?
 
ReverendHellh0und said:
So she went to places with sand, and saw troops... that's not "military experience". you can also see how she bungled benghazi I am of the opinion she should be as far away from foreign policy as possible.
Click to expand...

Well...there was that time when she said she actually attempted to join the marines...:roll:

Truth be told, I think in their heart of hearts, liberals WANT a conservative to win. Their peace signs and global warming banners are out of date, in bad disrepair, the posters are dusty and the ink is fading. The Communist party supported banners havent been waved in 7 years. Their activists are getting soft.
 
ReverendHellh0und said:
Do you agree with Hillary? Is this our fight? should we be sending our people and hardware over there?? Will she someday when politically convienent call this a "mistake" too? [/FONT][/COLOR]
Click to expand...

Hillary is putting out a statement that sounds good in the moment, but means nothing. She made it clear who she thinks her enemies are.
 
VanceMack said:
Well...there was that time when she said she actually attempted to join the marines...:roll:

Truth be told, I think in their heart of hearts, liberals WANT a conservative to win. Their peace signs and global warming banners are out of date, in bad disrepair, the posters are dusty and the ink is fading. The Communist party supported banners havent been waved in 7 years. Their activists are getting soft.
Click to expand...

They could do the whole occupy movement again. That was fun. Great year for it too...staying unseasonably warm.
 
Blue_State said:
They could do the whole occupy movement again. That was fun. Great year for it too...staying unseasonably warm.
Click to expand...
Yeah...but what fun was that REALLY when the dems they vote for where leaving their fundraisers with the banks and brokers on their way to the rally? How much joy can you get out of protesting banks and brokers and their influence on campaigns when the guy they rushed to the polls for was the biggest recipient of campaign cash? Or for that matter...the rat queen herself who they will be voting for is deeply involved with banks and Wlal Street...how are they going to hold an effective protest when their people are the biggest offenders/ Hell...thats like supporting Gore at Global Warming rallies knowing his house pollutes more than 35 normal households combined and that his private planes he flies on to his events pollute more than entire fleets of SUVs.
 
ReverendHellh0und said:
Do you agree with Hillary? Is this our fight? should we be sending our people and hardware over there?? Will she someday when politically convienent call this a "mistake" too? [/FONT][/COLOR]
Click to expand...

this is nothing more than another political stunt for Hilary.
 
VanceMack said:
Yeah...but what fun was that REALLY when the dems they vote for where leaving their fundraisers with the banks and brokers on their way to the rally? How much joy can you get out of protesting banks and brokers and their influence on campaigns when the guy they rushed to the polls for was the biggest recipient of campaign cash? Or for that matter...the rat queen herself who they will be voting for is deeply involved with banks and Wlal Street...how are they going to hold an effective protest when their people are the biggest offenders/ Hell...thats like supporting Gore at Global Warming rallies knowing his house pollutes more than 35 normal households combined and that his private planes he flies on to his events pollute more than entire fleets of SUVs.
Click to expand...

My entertainment was watching them knowing nothing would change. I even giggled as I watched them use their apple products.
 
Blue_State said:
My entertainment was watching them knowing nothing would change. I even giggled as I watched them use their apple products.
Click to expand...
Hey...their parents spend good money on those products. No sense letting a little thing like rabid protests against capitalism and consumerism get in the way of their pursuit of consumerism gained by mommy and daddy's capitalist ventures.

It was good of them to give up the rally as soon as the new semester started. Priorities, after all.
 
ReverendHellh0und;1065271159 Do you agree with Hillary? Is this our fight? should we be sending our people and hardware over there?? Will she someday when politically convienent call this a "mistake" too? [/QUOTE said:
I didn't think it was our fight at all, but if they're going to start launching Al Queda type attacks on foreign powers, it might be a different story.
Click to expand...
 
iguanaman said:
Hmm. Could it be the Russians veto power that stopped him? You need him to spell it out for you?
Click to expand...

Yes, how many times have I pointed out to this board that every attempt by Obama to secure a resolution for the use of force in Syria, did Russia and China point to the abuse of UNSCR 1973 in Libya as they said hell no? Must I spell it out for you? I just want joG to acknowledge that the reason we don't have the cover of the legitimacy of the UN in Syria is because we abused it last go around. Cause and effect, consequences and all that good stuff.
 
Last edited:
Eric7216 said:
Well, I don't see that happening anytime soon. Currently we have a guy who claimed to be anti-war and received a Nobel Peace Prize and he seems more militarily adventurous than almost anyone. And he doesn't know what he is doing. I would hope that you could see that.
But I guess there is always hope and change.
Click to expand...

Of course I see that, point that out here everyday. That's why I'm still looking for the guy or gal coming to the White House to really turn over a new FP plan, not just tell us they're going to, and then not. I do realize that this is not going to come from the establishment.
 
Montecresto said:
Yes, how many times have I pointed out to this board that every attempt by Obama to secure a resolution for the use of force in Syria, did Russia point to the abuse of UNSCR 1973 in Libya as they said hell no? Must I spell it out for you? I just want joG to acknowledge that the reason we don't have the cover of the legitimacy of the UN in Syria is because we abused it last go around. Cause and effect, consequences and all that good stuff.
Click to expand...

So you believe that Russia would have abandoned Assad if only we kept Gadaffi in power? You must be dreaming...
And honestly it was the Europeans and especially the French that spearheaded his ouster and as a member of NATO we had little choice but to go along.

NATO's Intervention In Libya: A New Model? : NPR
 
Last edited:
ReverendHellh0und said:
View attachment 67193104


Do you agree with Hillary? Is this our fight? should we be sending our people and hardware over there?? Will she someday when politically convienent call this a "mistake" too? [/FONT][/COLOR]
Click to expand...

Oh puh-lease....Hillary is as much of a war-hawk as the best of the Republicans. That has always been one of her major flaws.
 
iguanaman said:
So you believe that Russia would have abandoned Assad if only we kept Gadaffi in power? You must be dreaming...
Click to expand...

Wtf. Why would you suggest that I believe Russia would ever abandon their ally. The whole reason they told the US to **** off when we asked permission to go into Syria is because Syria is ..............................THEIR ****ING ALLY, HELLO.
 
Montecresto said:
Wtf. Why would you suggest that I believe Russia would ever abandon their ally. The whole reason they told the US to **** off when we asked permission to go into Syria is because Syria is ..............................THEIR ****ING ALLY, HELLO.
Click to expand...

Then stop complaining about Obama not getting U.N. authorization for ousting Assad... Russia would just veto it like I said.
 
Blue_State said:
I am with you on Hillary, but I will say this. She probably has the most combat/military experience when looking at all the candidates. When she was SoS she did visit many of the combat zones. Sniper fire aside, she did go to the front.
Click to expand...

Visiting a war zone doesn't mean anything. Was the federal response to Hurricane Katrina any less of a screw up just because Bush flew over it? Jeez...the excuses people from all stripes are making to justify Hillary. It's almost as if I've entered the twilight zone.
 
iguanaman said:
Then stop complaining about Obama not getting U.N. authorization for ousting Assad... Russia would just veto it like I said.
Click to expand...

Right, and then you don't get to go.
 
So far, all politicians have done this to us. But I suspect Americans will continue lining up to vote for establishment politicians.
 
disneydude said:
Oh puh-lease....Hillary is as much of a war-hawk as the best of the Republicans. That has always been one of her major flaws.
Click to expand...



Where are the protesters then?

And don't tell me you won't vote for her if shes the nominee.
 
Montecresto said:
Most likely, though it never ceases to amaze me the lengths American voters go.
Click to expand...

He won't win. Think about who gets polled. They use land lines. I've NEVER been polled ever. They don't call cell phones. Who uses landlines now? Old farts who might vote for trump. 40-50s and aren't at home and are at work. They are old enough to use cell phones and plenty don't. And they are a majority with 20s and so on right behinds
 
stonewall50 said:
He won't win. Think about who gets polled. They use land lines. I've NEVER been polled ever. They don't call cell phones. Who uses landlines now? Old farts who might vote for trump. 40-50s and aren't at home and are at work. They are old enough to use cell phones and plenty don't. And they are a majority with 20s and so on right behinds
Click to expand...

Do all the major polls still use land lines? I never thought of that, that would certainly skew the results. Im in my mid50's and dont have a land line. Havent for years.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom