• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Hillary Clinton calls for U.S. to 'intensify and broaden' efforts to fight ISIS

The ONLY reason why I support Hilary is simple. The balance of the Supreme Court. We cannot afford a right-wing candidate who will stack the Supreme Court with probably at least 2 justices if not more during the next term.

You've been around long enough to know that I didn't support Hilary in 2008. From Day 1 I was an Obama supporter and would still support him over Hilary, although I have been disappointed that he kept many of the same Bush policies in place. I had expected better from him. On the otherhand, we know that Hilary will keep many of those insane policies in place. I don't like that....but she is the most electable and therefore I am supporting her.


So you vote for a lying weasle who is also happy to send soldiers off to pointless wars.


"not in our name" I guess is no longer en vogue.
 
Then you aren't following along. I have said many times that I don't agree with Hilary on her foreign policy and view her (and Bill for that matter) as warhawks.

yet you admit you will vote for the chicken hawks...


The liars, the 1% ruling class, the monsanto backers, the criminals....


how are you any different?


IS hillare not "arrogant"? is she not "incompetent"??


you seem to have this double standard when it comes to your outrage.
 
yet you admit you will vote for the chicken hawks...


The liars, the 1% ruling class, the monsanto backers, the criminals....


how are you any different?


IS hillare not "arrogant"? is she not "incompetent"??


you seem to have this double standard when it comes to your outrage.

No. I don't think Hilary is "arrogant"....at least not in the same vein as Trump. As for incompetent, like Fiorina?......Hilary is definitely not incompetent. I don't always agree with her though.
 
The most electable what? george bush the IV?

No....if she were, I wouldn't vote for her. What you are failing to recognize or understand is that foreign policy is only 1 aspect of a candidates positions on the issues. If I were voting on foreign policy alone, I would not support Hilary. But since I vote on more than 1 issue, I do support her. Does that make it more understandable for you?
 
So you vote for a lying weasle who is also happy to send soldiers off to pointless wars.


"not in our name" I guess is no longer en vogue.

What it means is that Americans on both sides are still holding their noses and voting for evil, just the proverbial lesser of. I wonder when Americans will ever sideline both of these parties of greater and lesser evil and send an independent to the White House.
 
No....if she were, I wouldn't vote for her. What you are failing to recognize or understand is that foreign policy is only 1 aspect of a candidates positions on the issues. If I were voting on foreign policy alone, I would not support Hilary. But since I vote on more than 1 issue, I do support her. Does that make it more understandable for you?



looking through your posts I found this tidbit:


you said:
The difference is, those of us on the left will be content to let GWB fade into oblivion once we rid our country of him. Those on the right-wing have an ongoing fetish with Clinton. Probably envy that he is actually highly regarded and accomplished a great deal in his Presidency, while they keep selecting leaders who do nothing but leave the country in a mess.

How did that work for you? I had to go through 15 pages of you calling up bush before I found this. :lol:


anyway, what I was really looking for:

you said:
Yeah...you would never see GWB trying to use the military as pawns or as political ploys by say.....appearing with a "mission accomplished" banner.....yeah....a man of class would never use the military in such a low class manner.


So we can see by your willingness to vote for hillary, that stuff like this isnt actually really as important to you as the "R" or "D" next to thier name.
 
What it means is that Americans on both sides are still holding their noses and voting for evil, just the proverbial lesser of. I wonder when Americans will ever sideline both of these parties of greater and lesser evil and send an independent to the White House.



That's just it. as long as they accept this status quo, I get told I have no say for not voting, or voting the libertarian, but in reality, they have no say in that they are voting this status quo that has not thier best interests at heart.
 
looking through your posts I found this tidbit:




How did that work for you? I had to go through 15 pages of you calling up bush before I found this. :lol:


anyway, what I was really looking for:




So we can see by your willingness to vote for hillary, that stuff like this isnt actually really as important to you as the "R" or "D" next to thier name.


LOL.....so I noticed that you searched and were unable to come up with any post where I describe Hilary in glowing terms or a post that contradicts that I have said multiple times that she is a warhawk and that I disagree with her foreign policy positions.

If THAT were the best you could come up with....I would say, rather weak. You are usually better that Rev...but the reality is...you could search and search and you aren't going to find much better than that, so I should really give you a break.


I will say this though....when Hilary is President and stuffs a sock down her flight suit and stands before a "mission accomplished" banner declaring Victory......I will say the same about her. If Hilary decides to manipulate public fears and start wars that the neo-cons have wanted to fight for decades....I will condemn her as well. I wouldn't put it past her. The Clintons are pretty much share the same war machine politics that GWB did.
 
LOL.....so I noticed that you searched and were unable to come up with any post where I describe Hilary in glowing terms or a post that contradicts that I have said multiple times that she is a warhawk and that I disagree with her foreign policy positions.

If THAT were the best you could come up with....I would say, rather weak. You are usually better that Rev...but the reality is...you could search and search and you aren't going to find much better than that, so I should really give you a break.


I will say this though....when Hilary is President and stuffs a sock down her flight suit and stands before a "mission accomplished" banner declaring Victory......I will say the same about her. If Hilary decides to manipulate public fears and start wars that the neo-cons have wanted to fight for decades....I will condemn her as well. I wouldn't put it past her. The Clintons are pretty much share the same war machine politics that GWB did.


Never said you gave her a glowing support.


As for socks and floght suits.


"Dodged sniper fire" comes to mind.
 
That's just it. as long as they accept this status quo, I get told I have no say for not voting, or voting the libertarian, but in reality, they have no say in that they are voting this status quo that has not thier best interests at heart.

I disagree with those that might tell you you have no say for voting libertarian, or even not voting at all when the only options are two snakes, either of which will further damage the country.
 
I disagree with those that might tell you you have no say for voting libertarian, or even not voting at all when the only options are two snakes, either of which will further damage the country.



we may disagree 100% on the solution, but we both see the problem of the ruling class status quo.
 
Back
Top Bottom