- Joined
- Oct 12, 2005
- Messages
- 281,619
- Reaction score
- 100,389
- Location
- Ohio
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Libertarian - Right
So your reasoning for why these proposals violate the US Constitution is..."The Supreme Court is wrong?"
Solid argument.
The supreme court is often wrong or they make rulings based on the political winds blowing at the time. Scalia has admitted that the new deal is unconstitutional but he also claims that its been around too long to overturn. But since UBGC have not come up yet, and given the court's recent positions, I doubt the UBGC would be seen as constitutional. Sadly for you, the court has NOT ruled on UBGC pertaining ONLY to INTRA-STATE sales.
if you read Heller, and Lopez and McDonald, its hard to find support for something as stupid as a UBGC given that private sellers are prohibited, by federal law, from engaging in INTERSTATE commerce with other private individuals when it comes to second hand sales of firearms.