Why are you in denial ? Do you realise that 92% of Saudi's polled last year agree with ISIS aims ? They have both the money the people and motivation to have attacked you. I'm not really very interested in Whitewashes after the fact. Even dimwit Bush realised that attacking the Saudi's would be impossible given it would trigger an uprising by the whole Islamic world against it (hint Mecca is in Saudi Arabia) . The administration would also have been wary of triggering an energy crisis like happened post 1973 Yom Kippur only this time far worse. Iraq was therefore perfect patsy
The Butler report was denied access to materials pertaining to Saudi involvement which you would know if you had bothered reading what has already been linked for youThere is no reason for Saudi to fund 9/11. The reality is Bin Laden was Saudi but the Butler Report disagrees with your opinion.
Because those like yourself who choose not to learn by past mistakes are condemned to repeat them. That seems to be what you would have us doFurther why are you continuing this narrative because there is nothing anyone can do now about what happened yesterday let along 14 years ago.
Hitler has nothing to do with this. Ham fisted and profoundly stupid US foreign policy doesGo ahead continue to bury your head in the sand, Hitler wasn't a threat to you either.
Last edited by flogger; 07-03-15 at 09:38 AM.
“I think if Thomas Jefferson were looking down, the author of the Bill of Rights, on what’s being proposed here, he’d agree with it. He would agree that the First Amendment cannot be absolute.” - Chuck Schumer (D). Yet, Madison and Mason wrote the Bill of Rights, according to Sheila Jackson Lee, 400 years ago. Yup, it's a fact.