Thread: California Drought Taking Serious Toll On Aging Sewer System In San Francisco

Originally Posted by countryboy

That's what I thought too, so I read the article.

Took me a couple of reads then the "ahhh" moment came. Thanks for the info CB.

Originally Posted by American

This has what to do with San Francisco sewers?

You blamed liberals for poor infrastructure, and you then used San Francisco as an example. I then said, "okay if its an ideology which is the problem with the public infrastructure why not look towards our national congress for examples having to do with public infrastructure?". And posted an example about funding such an infrastructure project. But for some reason the amendment was rejected by Republicans (who are 98.8% of the time not regarded as "Liberals"). You then responded to "Why did they block it? Get back to me". So I got back to you to the various reasons why Republicans (98.8% of the time the party of Conservatives AKA opposite on the very narrow political spectrum) opposed it. So does it not have to do with liberalism? Or does it? Because if liberalism has to do with something about drought, thus causing "waste was getting dumped into the streets, the streets were getting all muddy", one would expect better public infrastructure bills being passed left and right by those conservatives in congress, especially when our infrastructure system is rated D+..


But then again.... You dont see that.



But then again... "Few things in America have lasted 150 years. San Francisco’s sewer system is a working relic but one that works
You might think that the drought would give the sewer system a break, with not as much water going through it. But, while San Franciscans are sending less water down the drain because of conservation, the same, or more sewage is being sent through the system that isn’t being drained as well as before.
“It’s an organic material. It breaks down. It creates hydrogen sulfide. That eats up the concrete in the pipes if it sits there long enough,” Moala said."

---****! Liberals! With their good sewer system, but causing liberal problems with their drought problems! Conspiracy!!!


"With thousands of people moving into San Francisco, the city’s infrastructure continues to be taxed, no more so than the sewer system. But, sewer workers say they’ll do their best. It’s their duty."

--- Silly liberals! I bet they call for a tax hike! But wait if they do, I bet those conservatives come marching out against it! But remember if you call for help from the feds, it most likely wont be there hence the amendment that got rejected by those conservatives (AKA the US infrastructure heroes)

Originally Posted by TheDemSocialist

You blamed liberals for poor infrastructure, and you then used San Francisco as an example. I then said, "okay if its an ideology which is the problem with the public infrastructure why not look towards our national congress for examples having to do with public infrastructure?". And posted an example about funding such an infrastructure project. But for some reason the amendment was rejected by Republicans (who are 98.8% of the time not regarded as "Liberals"). You then responded to "Why did they block it? Get back to me". So I got back to you to the various reasons why Republicans (98.8% of the time the party of Conservatives AKA opposite on the very narrow political spectrum) opposed it. So does it not have to do with liberalism? Or does it? Because if liberalism has to do with something about drought, thus causing "waste was getting dumped into the streets, the streets were getting all muddy", one would expect better public infrastructure bills being passed left and right by those conservatives in congress, especially when our infrastructure system is rated D+..


But then again.... You dont see that.



But then again... "Few things in America have lasted 150 years. San Francisco’s sewer system is a working relic but one that works
You might think that the drought would give the sewer system a break, with not as much water going through it. But, while San Franciscans are sending less water down the drain because of conservation, the same, or more sewage is being sent through the system that isn’t being drained as well as before.
“It’s an organic material. It breaks down. It creates hydrogen sulfide. That eats up the concrete in the pipes if it sits there long enough,” Moala said."

---****! Liberals! With their good sewer system, but causing liberal problems with their drought problems! Conspiracy!!!


"With thousands of people moving into San Francisco, the city’s infrastructure continues to be taxed, no more so than the sewer system. But, sewer workers say they’ll do their best. It’s their duty."

--- Silly liberals! I bet they call for a tax hike! But wait if they do, I bet those conservatives come marching out against it! But remember if you call for help from the feds, it most likely wont be there hence the amendment that got rejected by those conservatives (AKA the US infrastructure heroes)

I think that he meant that Liberals caused the drought by conducting an Anti-Rain Dance while frolicking with Vegans under the pagan moon while secretly plotting against Christians, but then again my comprehension skills are severely lacking.

Infrastructure is liberal.

Also, drought.

Bastions of conservatism like Alabama have amazing infrastructure, of course.

Originally Posted by TheDemSocialist

You blamed liberals for poor infrastructure, and you then used San Francisco as an example. I then said, "okay if its an ideology which is the problem with the public infrastructure why not look towards our national congress for examples having to do with public infrastructure?". And posted an example about funding such an infrastructure project. But for some reason the amendment was rejected by Republicans (who are 98.8% of the time not regarded as "Liberals"). You then responded to "Why did they block it? Get back to me". So I got back to you to the various reasons why Republicans (98.8% of the time the party of Conservatives AKA opposite on the very narrow political spectrum) opposed it. So does it not have to do with liberalism? Or does it? Because if liberalism has to do with something about drought, thus causing "waste was getting dumped into the streets, the streets were getting all muddy", one would expect better public infrastructure bills being passed left and right by those conservatives in congress, especially when our infrastructure system is rated D+..


But then again.... You dont see that.



But then again... "Few things in America have lasted 150 years. San Francisco’s sewer system is a working relic but one that works
You might think that the drought would give the sewer system a break, with not as much water going through it. But, while San Franciscans are sending less water down the drain because of conservation, the same, or more sewage is being sent through the system that isn’t being drained as well as before.
“It’s an organic material. It breaks down. It creates hydrogen sulfide. That eats up the concrete in the pipes if it sits there long enough,” Moala said."

---****! Liberals! With their good sewer system, but causing liberal problems with their drought problems! Conspiracy!!!


"With thousands of people moving into San Francisco, the city’s infrastructure continues to be taxed, no more so than the sewer system. But, sewer workers say they’ll do their best. It’s their duty."

--- Silly liberals! I bet they call for a tax hike! But wait if they do, I bet those conservatives come marching out against it! But remember if you call for help from the feds, it most likely wont be there hence the amendment that got rejected by those conservatives (AKA the US infrastructure heroes)

It's a liberal city, dude. What don't you get about that? They should be setting the example. Plastic pipe doesn't care if there's water or not. Get a clue.