We all know this is just a death rattle. The issue has been decided. There is no hope for this avenue of argument. This is over.
Who do you think has been against drug laws since the beginning? Yeah, libertarians. Thanks for stealing our position and figuring out a way to use it to get tax revenue.
Oh and btw, who was for gay marriage first? Yup, libertarians. Liberals are the slow kid on the block that thinks he's a genius.
Last edited by Henrin; 06-29-15 at 01:32 AM.
Since when was refusing to do your job because of your religious beliefs acceptable?
Social democrat is no longer an accurate description of my views.
Would it be kosher with everyone if 51% of a state decided christians shouldn't be allowed to marry?
"If I take death into my life, acknowledge it, and face it squarely, I will free myself from the anxiety of death and the pettiness of life - and only then will I be free to become myself." ~ Martin Heidegger
Or Jewish state workers deny muslims their marriage license or the other way around? Hey, I am an atheist, could I "object on moral-religious grounds" to give wedding licenses to anybody who is religious?
It's just a wedding license, I think this is just petty, childish and ultimately behavior that is going to achieve absolutely nothing. It just shows this Paxton is a sore loser who thinks he can pick and choose which supreme court rulings he has to follow.
Wilders is a piece of gutter trash, a gutless populist who has no morality to speak of.
The comedy is we allow government in our relationships. This is some old tyranny BS left over from monarchies. There is no need for government to be involved with marriage or the ability to hand out a license for said marriage.
"We ain't a sharp species. We kill each other over arguments about what happens when you die, then fail to see the ******* irony in that." - Justin Halpern