Page 8 of 8 FirstFirst ... 678
Results 71 to 73 of 73

Thread: Britain says no Iran deal 'better than a bad deal'

  1. #71
    Sage
    Montecresto's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Last Seen
    03-13-16 @ 09:59 PM
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    24,561

    Re: Britain says no Iran deal 'better than a bad deal'

    Quote Originally Posted by Simpleχity View Post
    From your link.

    For example, the precise details of how the International Atomic Energy Agency will inspect and monitor Iranian facilities is likely to be secret because the agency doesn't want to tip off other proliferators. The names of Iranian scientists associated with the program whom the agency would like to interview will also not be shared with the public.

    This actually makes sense. We already know that Israel assassinates Iranian scientists suspected of involvement in the Iranian nuclear program, let's just give them the names of the ones that actually are. I can see why the P-5 +1 would wish to keep that secret. And disclosing the exact movements of the IAEA would be beneficial to any other countries that may wish to get around inspectors. Not to worry.
    Killing one person is murder, killing 100,000 is foreign policy

  2. #72
    long standing member
    justabubba's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Last Seen
    Today @ 01:38 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    32,425

    Re: Britain says no Iran deal 'better than a bad deal'

    Quote Originally Posted by MMC View Post
    You like that the Russians are backing the Iranians.
    hell yes
    takes the possibility of armed action off of the table
    tho we could still engage in a proxy war with russia supplying the iranians as we supply the israelis and saudis
    seems to cause more commotion than the very issue of non-proliferation

    "What" did you think they were the good guys or something?
    they are supporting the legitimate side in this instance
    we have a history of supporting the wrong team. such as when we pulled our promised support of ho chi minh after WWII, where he fought the japanese beside us, and instead supported the french attempts to re-colonize vietnam. our support of the house of saud and the government of israel instead of iran in this matter is another such debacle

    Do you like what they stand for too?
    i like that they are backing the people of iran. the most western-like and educated culture in the ME outside of israel

    We already have a long term War. Be a shame if a couple of fools got mistaken for the enemy.
    do we really want to engage in mossad tactics to take out foreign leaders
    would you be so righteous about it if those table were turned back upon our own elected leaders?
    think "JFK"

    It don't take any military action off the table.
    really? you believe we are going to go to war against a russian backed iran? think again

    It just makes Russia look weaker once they back down. Which they will do, not wanting to confront us directly.
    yea, putin is going to back down. he has such a history of doing that [/sarcasm]
    he just extended his middle finger at the west while uttering "check mate assholes"
    and good on him for doing so
    time to cut a deal and return iran to the world's economy. it will help counter saudi arabia's attempts to control the price of oil
    we are negotiating about dividing a pizza and in the meantime israel is eating it
    Quote Originally Posted by BrewerBob View Post
    The Democrats couldn't be more tone deaf if they had their eardrums incinerated with a hot poker.
    Quote Originally Posted by apdst View Post
    Why confuse things with facts?

  3. #73
    Banned
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Chicago Illinois
    Last Seen
    10-14-15 @ 07:28 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Private
    Posts
    56,981

    Re: Britain says no Iran deal 'better than a bad deal'

    Quote Originally Posted by justabubba View Post
    hell yes
    takes the possibility of armed action off of the table
    tho we could still engage in a proxy war with russia supplying the iranians as we supply the israelis and saudis
    seems to cause more commotion than the very issue of non-proliferation


    they are supporting the legitimate side in this instance
    we have a history of supporting the wrong team. such as when we pulled our promised support of ho chi minh after WWII, where he fought the japanese beside us, and instead supported the french attempts to re-colonize vietnam. our support of the house of saud and the government of israel instead of iran in this matter is another such debacle


    i like that they are backing the people of iran. the most western-like and educated culture in the ME outside of israel


    do we really want to engage in mossad tactics to take out foreign leaders
    would you be so righteous about it if those table were turned back upon our own elected leaders?
    think "JFK"


    really? you believe we are going to go to war against a russian backed iran? think again


    yea, putin is going to back down. he has such a history of doing that [/sarcasm]
    he just extended his middle finger at the west while uttering "check mate assholes"
    and good on him for doing so
    time to cut a deal and return iran to the world's economy. it will help counter saudi arabia's attempts to control the price of oil

    Well, you wont have to worry with Russia sticking its middle finger up at the USA and giving it to us really good like. Not with this Administration. They're inept.

    Iran isn't standing on any Righteous ground. Its not like their upstanding Global Citizens, haven't been for a while now.

    http://www.debatepolitics.com/intern...post1064787481 (Iran, World Powers Reportedly Reach Tentative Agreement On Nuclear Sanctions Relief..)

Page 8 of 8 FirstFirst ... 678

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •