• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Breaking: US S.Ct. Rules Same Sex Marriage Constitutionally Protected[W:320]

The church isn't supposed to follow the ways of the world. it is supposed to stay separate from the world.
any church that does so violates biblical scriptures.

You don't get to determine how others interpret the scriptures or decide how their religion should work. That is for them to decide, part of freedom of religion.
 
You give so many ****s you responded to a post that wasn't even addressed to you. You can be a flaming faggot all you want, you'll never be accepted. You'll always be an outcast, no matter what the court says. I hate you.

B4YC7sVCYAAXwo9.jpg
 
which means they did it. if they had upheld the constitution then it wouldn't have mattered. they chose to ignore the constitution and the law and enact their own
policy. now they have provided a way to up sure religious freedom in this country.

you will see pastors and churches sued for not allowing gay weddings. you will see other religious organizations sued for standing up for their beliefs.


What they should have done, and what many scholars (Otherwise known as equally qualified to sit on the bench) thought they would do, including me, was, send this back to the states or to the Federal legislative branch for consideration. Roberts himself mocked Ginsberg quoting her just three year earlier citing her point that domestic relations are uniquely the sole property of the States.. Well, yeah but that was three ago, She has so evolved since then. :)


Tim-
 
People can still choose to fight it...legally. They just shouldnt be a dick about it.

I probably wouldn't WANT to fight it if I thought this would be the end of it and the gay groups would now just go live their lives and stop calling me names. but it won't happen. a year from now we will STILL be arguing about how unfair the rest of the country is toward gay people for one reason or another. you watch. it will NEVER end.
 
Another statement showing that you don't have a clue how God operates.

When Israel went into captivity to Babylon, the 'good' went with them.

But it will sort itself out real well at the Judgment.

Most people don't arrange their lives to be accordance with a 4000 year old book.
 
The church isn't supposed to follow the ways of the world. it is supposed to stay separate from the world.
any church that does so violates biblical scriptures.

Actually Churches have no choice but to follow their parishioners or die. Is that what you are suggesting? That they go down with the ship? Biblical scriptures have been interpreted in different ways since the beginning and it won't stop now.
 
So just to be clear, you are in agreement with ISIS stance that gay marriage is bad?

I'm in agreement with God that gay marriage is bad. ISIS is apparently in agreement with Muhammad / Allah, who isn't God.

Got it?
 
I'm just glad it's over. Maybe now we will only see a few threads here on gay marriage instead of 20 per week.

This issue has deserved to become a non-issue for a LONG time now.

Congrats America!
 
They used flowery language, yes. That happens.

But the legal argument is sound. No state interest exists in barring a same-sex couple from signing a legal contract and therefore the equal protection challenge is upheld.
That's your argument, not Kennedy's. He never considers whether or not a state interest exists.
 
You don't get to determine how others interpret the scriptures or decide how their religion should work. That is for them to decide, part of freedom of religion.

Go read the bible and get back to me on what it says. I can tell you that there is only one way to read it. the only way to read it differently is to distort what the bible says into something else which is altogether a different biblical issue.
 
What they should have done, and what many scholars (Otherwise known as equally qualified to sit on the bench) thought they would do, including me, was, send this back to the states or to the Federal legislative branch for consideration. Roberts himself mocked Ginsberg quoting her just three year earlier citing her point that domestic relations are uniquely the sole property of the States.. Well, yeah but that was three ago, She has so evolved since then. :)


Tim-

"Many scholars" is code word for those that agree with your position. Most scholars, from what I've seen, agree with the majority's ruling on this.
 
Galatians 6:7 ESV
Do not be deceived: God is not mocked, for whatever one sows, that will he also reap.

I'd be damned scared.

Damn right! How dare anyone sow love in today's world, god must be really pissed.
 
Go read the bible and get back to me on what it says. I can tell you that there is only one way to read it. the only way to read it differently is to distort what the bible says into something else which is altogether a different biblical issue.

Been there, done that, don't agree with it. Nor do I believe that you have any right to decide how others read or interpret the Bible for their religion. What you are proposing is not freedom of religion, but rather "they should see it my way, the way I see it or they aren't really a religion".
 
Actually Churches have no choice but to follow their parishioners or die. Is that what you are suggesting? That they go down with the ship? Biblical scriptures have been interpreted in different ways since the beginning and it won't stop now.

find me a scripture that supports gay marriage. let me know when you find it. I can tell you now you want because it doesn't exist.
 
Keep waving your cognitive dissonance. You just need a old testament angry hit man god fantasy, because you love that whole vengeance and violence and torture from your "loving" god.

Remember that next time a tornado wipes out a church in the bible belt.

Another nonsense post.
 
I probably wouldn't WANT to fight it if I thought this would be the end of it and the gay groups would now just go live their lives and stop calling me names. but it won't happen. a year from now we will STILL be arguing about how unfair the rest of the country is toward gay people for one reason or another. you watch. it will NEVER end.
Meh...names. :lamo come on. Who cares? Dont accept the labels.
 
There is a difference between changes in society to accepting same sex couples/marriages, and changes within the laws to doing so. Society is allowed to maintain bias, the law should not, at least not without some state interest furthered in doing so. Waiting longer for this is hurting people, their families. The bans themselves do not do anything but maintain unfair treatment of people based on their relationship choices that certain others don't approve of within the law.


Well, perhaps you see it that way, but then logic dictates that homosexuals have been hurt since, well forever. The winds were shifting and rightfully so, but these Justices saw that it wasn't shifting fast enough, and that was wrong to try and justify by clever manipulation of the language, and interpretation of centuries old legal precedent in profoundly peculiar ways.


Tim-
 
right here it is folks the next violation of the constitution in one post.

Yes, no choosing, no choice. We will decide your beliefs for you. And if you don't comply, we will destroy your business and your life. That is the left of today.
What, little old us? Of course we would never do that. Oh, but it might eventually come to that.
 
Another nonsense post.

When a tornado whips through the bible belt...it is just as much god's vengeance as your fantasy Hitman god vengeance that you crave.

Which is to say: none...because it doesn't exist.
 
Equal protection under the 'law'. They changed the 'law' of 14 states.

Because those laws violated equal protection. The U.S is the 21st country to legalize SSM, it is not like we are blazing any new ground with this. You can always join ISIS and throw gays off buildings if that is your thing.
 
ya think? 5 lawyers just changes the definition of a word that has been around(and a vital part of society) since the dawn of man. and the left thinks we should all just shut up and get in line. doesn't work that way. They could make a ruling tomorrow saying the sky is orange and not blue. doesn't mean everyone blindly goes along. you mostly just smirk and slowly shake your head and just move on with your life.

orange_sky_by_scandalize-d5a6rg8.jpg
 
Back
Top Bottom