32 “Whoever acknowledges me before others, I will also acknowledge before my Father in heaven. 33 But whoever disowns me before others, I will disown before my Father in heaven.
So it appears that you have some basis for worrying about extending the reasoning, but I would be hesitant to read the lack of a discussion of an explicit constitutional test as a reading that a constitutional test does not exist.
By the way, I must admit that you were correct regarding my discussion of the most recent polygamist decision. I thought the Supreme Court had already issued a "cert. denied" order in regards to the Utah Supreme Court decision, but it appears that case is actually still awaiting an order from the circuit court.
Ha! Define legal argument for us would you? Are you suggesting that the 4 dissenting justices lacked citation in their arguments? I suspect you didn't actually read it if that's your contention?And?
Actually, the dissents are notably lacking in legal argument
“When buying and selling are controlled by legislation, the first things to be bought and sold are legislators.” - P. J. O’Rourke
“Socialism is great until you run out of someone elses money” Margaret Thatcher
In addition, marriage has other benefits in addition to those two
A Canadian conservative is one who believes in limited government and that the government should stay out of our wallets and out of our bedrooms.
.4 x 225=.9
.9 x 300= 2.7
2.7 x 500= a large number
Next add in all the variables and coefficients and Muslims will be in the 100 millions or about one fifth of the total population,
This isn't to mention the fact that they will soon be the majority in Europe