Page 37 of 193 FirstFirst ... 2735363738394787137 ... LastLast
Results 361 to 370 of 1930

Thread: Breaking: US S.Ct. Rules Same Sex Marriage Constitutionally Protected[W:320]

  1. #361
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Last Seen
    09-27-16 @ 10:59 AM
    Lean
    Liberal
    Posts
    5,189

    re: Breaking: US S.Ct. Rules Same Sex Marriage Constitutionally Protected[W:320]

    Quote Originally Posted by Logicman View Post
    It's a vote to turn America into a modern-day Sodom and Gomorrah.

    Now America gets to pay the price for this spiritual dwarfism, and it's not going to be pretty.

    "Supreme Court Justices, can you judge the ways of God? Can you, with manmade verdicts, overrule the eternal laws of God? There is another court, and there is another Judge. And before Him, all men and all judges will give account. If a nation's high court should pass judgment on the Almighty, should you then be surprised if the Almighty should pass judgment on that court and that nation?" Rabbi Jonathan Cahn

    Rabbi Jonathan Cahn Gives America a Final Warning - Freedom Outpost
    Good thing we don't all hold to the teaching of an old relic that belongs in a museum. I imagine god will be as silent on this as he is when people cry out to him in a disaster.

  2. #362
    Sage
    Paperview's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    The Road Less Travelled
    Last Seen
    Yesterday @ 10:41 PM
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    6,134

    re: Breaking: US S.Ct. Rules Same Sex Marriage Constitutionally Protected[W:320]

    Quote Originally Posted by SmokeAndMirrors View Post


    I raise my glass from this end of the pond to my many friends who will have their lives changed and improved by this. Geez, finally.


  3. #363
    Sage
    Logicman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    United States
    Last Seen
    Today @ 12:04 AM
    Lean
    Conservative
    Posts
    12,236

    re: Breaking: US S.Ct. Rules Same Sex Marriage Constitutionally Protected[W:320]

    Quote Originally Posted by beefheart View Post
    Yeah, here comes the "angry god" as a hitman theme. You soooo want your god to start killing and punishing that it excites you. How savage of you.
    It's not up to me, beefheart. It's up to God and I doubt you're going to be a fan of what ultimately happens.
    "Progressives aren't really progressive. They're regressive, all the way back to Sodom and Gomorrah." - author unknown

  4. #364
    Guru

    Winchester's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Last Seen
    Yesterday @ 11:47 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Other
    Posts
    3,831

    re: Breaking: US S.Ct. Rules Same Sex Marriage Constitutionally Protected[W:320]

    Quote Originally Posted by Samhain View Post
    I don't think anyone would challenge the church directly. It makes more sense that they would challenge continuing to allow someone to select which marriage licenses they will sign and which ones they won't.
    Which is why the religious ceremony should be divorced from the civil ceremony.

  5. #365
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Last Seen
    09-27-16 @ 10:59 AM
    Lean
    Liberal
    Posts
    5,189

    re: Breaking: US S.Ct. Rules Same Sex Marriage Constitutionally Protected[W:320]

    Quote Originally Posted by ThePlayDrive View Post
    Scalia is a nutcase.
    Luckily, he 79 years old.

  6. #366
    NERV Commander
    JayDubya's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Last Seen
    Today @ 01:13 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Libertarian
    Posts
    15,107

    re: Breaking: US S.Ct. Rules Same Sex Marriage Constitutionally Protected[W:320]

    Quote Originally Posted by Taylor View Post
    I'm inclined to agree with Roberts that this ruling has delayed that, if anything.
    A-yup.

    By removing this from the realm in which it justly belongs by the rule of law, preventing the people from voting on the topic at hand as is their authority under the Constitution, per the 10th Amendment, this court has rendered "moving on" a logical impossibility.

    Had the people of each state come to this conclusion on their own or had the majority of states ratified an amendment stating so, that would be a different matter.

  7. #367
    Winged Eel Fingerling
    beefheart's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Location
    The burning sands of the desert southwest.
    Last Seen
    Today @ 12:08 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Moderate
    Posts
    14,943

    re: Breaking: US S.Ct. Rules Same Sex Marriage Constitutionally Protected[W:320]

    Quote Originally Posted by Tettsuo View Post
    You beat me to it!

    There are a whole lot of Scott Tennerman's around here, eating chili.
    Ich habe schon Pferde vor der Apotheke kotzen sehen.

  8. #368
    Magic!

    Cardinal's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Last Seen
    @
    Gender
    Lean
    Liberal
    Posts
    24,537

    re: Breaking: US S.Ct. Rules Same Sex Marriage Constitutionally Protected[W:320]

    Quote Originally Posted by Winchester View Post
    Which is why the religious ceremony should be divorced from the civil ceremony.
    It isn't already? When I got married it was in no church and there were no church officials (that I was aware of) in the room.

  9. #369
    Sage
    blackjack50's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    Florida
    Last Seen
    Yesterday @ 07:19 PM
    Lean
    Conservative
    Posts
    20,497

    re: Breaking: US S.Ct. Rules Same Sex Marriage Constitutionally Protected[W:320]

    Quote Originally Posted by Taylor View Post
    I'm inclined to agree with Roberts that this ruling has delayed that, if anything.
    God I hope not. This issue should have been dead 20 years ago. I'm tired of hearing about.
    The Crowd is not the sum of its parts.

  10. #370
    Sage

    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Last Seen
    Today @ 06:32 AM
    Lean
    Centrist
    Posts
    40,356

    re: Breaking: US S.Ct. Rules Same Sex Marriage Constitutionally Protected[W:320]

    Quote Originally Posted by DA60 View Post
    Way to go SCOTUS...finally America joins the 21'st century on this.

    It is absolute nonsense that the state could decide who can marry and who cannot. ANY consenting adults should be able to marry.

    And the hypocrisy of the right saying that same sex marriage is against the Bible, yet the Pope now supports global warming being caused by humanity - though the right is still insisting there is little/no global warming.

    So, basically, the right just wants to believe whatever it wants and only uses the Bible whenever it suits them.


    Once again, I am neither lib nor con.
    Using the Bible to make law would be unconstitutional any which way you look at it.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •