Page 172 of 193 FirstFirst ... 72122162170171172173174182 ... LastLast
Results 1,711 to 1,720 of 1930

Thread: Breaking: US S.Ct. Rules Same Sex Marriage Constitutionally Protected[W:320]

  1. #1711
    Guru
    WorldWatcher's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Last Seen
    Yesterday @ 10:18 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    3,027

    Re: Breaking: US S.Ct. Rules Same Sex Marriage Constitutionally Protected[W:320]

    Quote Originally Posted by scatt View Post
    Why do you keep admitting defeat?

    No "defeat" admitted or happening.


    Why do you choose to lie?


    >>>>

  2. #1712
    Guru
    scatt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Last Seen
    09-20-15 @ 09:25 PM
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    4,384

    Re: Breaking: US S.Ct. Rules Same Sex Marriage Constitutionally Protected[W:320]

    Stop lying, you admitted defeat.

  3. #1713
    Sage
    Paperview's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    The Road Less Travelled
    Last Seen
    Today @ 08:33 AM
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    6,142

    Re: Breaking: US S.Ct. Rules Same Sex Marriage Constitutionally Protected[W:320]

    Quote Originally Posted by scatt View Post
    Why do you keep admitting defeat?
    Such weak tea.

    Why can't you just post the part of the ruling you're referring to?

    I've looked and WorldWatcher is right.

  4. #1714
    Guru
    WorldWatcher's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Last Seen
    Yesterday @ 10:18 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    3,027

    Re: Breaking: US S.Ct. Rules Same Sex Marriage Constitutionally Protected[W:320]

    Quote Originally Posted by scatt View Post
    Stop lying, you admitted defeat.

    I never admitted defeat.

    Now, post the part of the majority ruling that specifies incest is now allowed and I will admit defeat.



    Or will you admit that the word "incest" doesn't appear in the majority opinion of the court in the Obergefell ruling?



    >>>>

  5. #1715
    Sage
    disneydude's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Los Angeles
    Last Seen
    Yesterday @ 12:25 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Liberal
    Posts
    23,389

    Re: Breaking: US S.Ct. Rules Same Sex Marriage Constitutionally Protected[W:320]

    Quote Originally Posted by scatt View Post
    Good to see you agree you have no argument.

    Kennedy's ruling does not exclude incest marriage.
    You are seriously stretching dude....but I guess that's about all you have left.

  6. #1716
    Guru
    scatt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Last Seen
    09-20-15 @ 09:25 PM
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    4,384

    Re: Breaking: US S.Ct. Rules Same Sex Marriage Constitutionally Protected[W:320]

    No idea what the princess guy is talking about.

    Quote Originally Posted by WorldWatcher View Post
    Now, post the part of the majority ruling that specifies incest is now allowed and I will admit defeat.
    I did, turbo. Thanks fore admitting defeat again.

    Quote Originally Posted by Paperview View Post
    Why can't you just post the part of the ruling you're referring to?
    I posted the specific pages and the start of sentences.

  7. #1717
    Sage
    Paperview's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    The Road Less Travelled
    Last Seen
    Today @ 08:33 AM
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    6,142

    Re: Breaking: US S.Ct. Rules Same Sex Marriage Constitutionally Protected[W:320]

    Quote Originally Posted by scatt View Post
    No idea what the princess guy is talking about.



    I did, turbo. Thanks fore admitting defeat again.



    I posted the specific pages and the start of sentences.
    I know why you won't post the exact verbiage you are referring to -- because it will show - as we have seen - it doesn't say what you say it does.

    It's all in your ImaginationLand.

  8. #1718
    Sage
    Anthony60's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    Northern New Jersey
    Last Seen
    Today @ 01:26 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Conservative
    Posts
    5,144

    Re: Breaking: US S.Ct. Rules Same Sex Marriage Constitutionally Protected[W:320]

    Quote Originally Posted by JasperL View Post
    And all rights can be limited.

    Is it a problem for you or anyone else to come up with defensible reasons to prohibit incestuous marriages? I wouldn't think so....
    Yes, it is a problem now. It wasn't before.
    "We have met the enemy and they are ours..." -- Oliver Hazard Perry
    "I don't want a piece of you... I want the whole thing!" -- Bob Barker

  9. #1719
    Sage
    Anthony60's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    Northern New Jersey
    Last Seen
    Today @ 01:26 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Conservative
    Posts
    5,144

    Re: Breaking: US S.Ct. Rules Same Sex Marriage Constitutionally Protected[W:320]

    Quote Originally Posted by roguenuke View Post
    No, it doesn't. I'm willing to bet the US would not see it that way either.

    An Amendment to the Constitution, by its very nature cannot be unconstitutional so long as it is enacted in the proper manner. There is nothing in the ruling that includes it either.
    There is something seriously wrong when we need a Constitutional amendment to prevent siblings from marrying. That is the road this court has set us on.
    "We have met the enemy and they are ours..." -- Oliver Hazard Perry
    "I don't want a piece of you... I want the whole thing!" -- Bob Barker

  10. #1720
    Guru
    scatt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Last Seen
    09-20-15 @ 09:25 PM
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    4,384

    Re: Breaking: US S.Ct. Rules Same Sex Marriage Constitutionally Protected[W:320]

    Quote Originally Posted by Paperview View Post
    .
    I posted the exact pages and start of sentences, from the link turbo posted.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •