Page 171 of 193 FirstFirst ... 71121161169170171172173181 ... LastLast
Results 1,701 to 1,710 of 1930

Thread: Breaking: US S.Ct. Rules Same Sex Marriage Constitutionally Protected[W:320]

  1. #1701
    Guru
    WorldWatcher's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Last Seen
    Yesterday @ 10:56 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    3,027

    Re: Breaking: US S.Ct. Rules Same Sex Marriage Constitutionally Protected[W:320]

    Quote Originally Posted by scatt View Post
    Go back one page.

    You said it specifically allows incest marriage.

    Yet a discussion of incest marriage isn't contained in the opinion.


    Your inability to quote what you specifically said existed is noted.



    >>>>

  2. #1702
    Guru
    scatt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Last Seen
    09-20-15 @ 09:25 PM
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    4,384

    Re: Breaking: US S.Ct. Rules Same Sex Marriage Constitutionally Protected[W:320]

    Quote Originally Posted by WorldWatcher View Post
    You said it specifically allows incest marriage.
    I gave you the page numbers from your link, as well as the start of each quote. Not looking at them is you admitting defeat. Any response to this post that does not specifically address what I linked you will be admission of defeat. I dare you to admit defeat to me again.

  3. #1703
    Sage
    chromium's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    A2
    Last Seen
    11-09-16 @ 12:18 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    14,227

    Re: Breaking: US S.Ct. Rules Same Sex Marriage Constitutionally Protected[W:320]

    Quote Originally Posted by Cephus View Post
    Reagan was the last Republican President that wasn't completely in the pocket of the religious right. He didn't take them seriously, he knew when to pretend to be on their side to get their support but I'm pretty sure he thought they were idiots.
    From comments gleaned from his survivors and his biographer, he was privately tolerant if not very PC. There was a gay couple who stayed at the white house and he was friends with rock hudson. He was also, while preparing to run for his 1st term, very outspokenly opposed to anita bryant's crusade against gay teachers. From this angle, it's ridiculous that repubs today will trip over each other trying to declare undying allegiance to reagan.

    In terms of governing, he's frequently accused of doing nothing during the AIDS crisis, but i find this to be a little more complicated. Spending requires congressional approval, and while if the victims had been mostly children (ex: polio), the government would've spent untold billions finding a cure, spending did go up substantially between 1984-1990 and reagan did force his surgeon general to make it a priority.

    If someone in an interview pointed this all out to ted cruz or huckabee, i'm sure they'd deny it endlessly

  4. #1704
    Guru
    WorldWatcher's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Last Seen
    Yesterday @ 10:56 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    3,027

    Re: Breaking: US S.Ct. Rules Same Sex Marriage Constitutionally Protected[W:320]

    Quote Originally Posted by scatt View Post
    I gave you the page numbers from your link, as well as the start of each quote. Not looking at them is you admitting defeat. Any response to this post that does not specifically address what I linked you will be admission of defeat. I dare you to admit defeat to me again.

    I've read the decision and incest isn't mentioned.


    This case does not specifically authorize incest (which was your claim). If incest marriage ever becomes legal, that will be a whole new set of laws and/or court decisions.



    >>>>

  5. #1705
    Guru
    scatt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Last Seen
    09-20-15 @ 09:25 PM
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    4,384

    Re: Breaking: US S.Ct. Rules Same Sex Marriage Constitutionally Protected[W:320]

    Thank you for admitting defeat again.

  6. #1706
    Sage
    clownboy's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Oregon
    Last Seen
    08-17-16 @ 08:31 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Other
    Posts
    26,087

    Re: Breaking: US S.Ct. Rules Same Sex Marriage Constitutionally Protected[W:320]

    Quote Originally Posted by chromium View Post
    From comments gleaned from his survivors and his biographer, he was privately tolerant if not very PC. There was a gay couple who stayed at the white house and he was friends with rock hudson. He was also, while preparing to run for his 1st term, very outspokenly opposed to anita bryant's crusade against gay teachers. From this angle, it's ridiculous that repubs today will trip over each other trying to declare undying allegiance to reagan.

    In terms of governing, he's frequently accused of doing nothing during the AIDS crisis, but i find this to be a little more complicated. Spending requires congressional approval, and while if the victims had been mostly children (ex: polio), the government would've spent untold billions finding a cure, spending did go up substantially between 1984-1990 and reagan did force his surgeon general to make it a priority.

    If someone in an interview pointed this all out to ted cruz or huckabee, i'm sure they'd deny it endlessly
    He lived in Hollywood since the 30s and was president of the Screen Actor's Guild. Of course he didn't have any problem whatsoever with behind the scenes homosexuality. And by the time he "outspokenly opposed" Bryant it was all the political rage to do so. This is Clayfoot Reagan you're talking about.
    Roberts wrote: "If you are among the many Americans -- of whatever sexual orientation -- who favor expanding same-sex marriage, by all means celebrate today's decision. ... But do not celebrate the Constitution. It had nothing to do with it."

  7. #1707
    Guru
    WorldWatcher's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Last Seen
    Yesterday @ 10:56 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    3,027

    Re: Breaking: US S.Ct. Rules Same Sex Marriage Constitutionally Protected[W:320]

    Quote Originally Posted by scatt View Post
    Thank you for admitting defeat again.

    No "defeat" admitted.


    You were unable to support your claim that the ruling specifically allows incest marriage and could provide a citation.


    Must be a liberal mentality, make a claim, don't support and instead of admitting the claim was unsupported claim "victory".




    >>>>

  8. #1708
    Guru
    scatt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Last Seen
    09-20-15 @ 09:25 PM
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    4,384

    Re: Breaking: US S.Ct. Rules Same Sex Marriage Constitutionally Protected[W:320]

    Why do you keep admitting defeat?

  9. #1709
    Professor
    JoeTrumps's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Location
    Memphis
    Last Seen
    12-05-16 @ 10:29 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Conservative
    Posts
    1,298

    Re: Breaking: US S.Ct. Rules Same Sex Marriage Constitutionally Protected[W:320]

    funny. they get the law passed with the motto "it won't effect you so shut up bigot". then, as it becomes more obvious now and in the future how it WILL effect MANY things, the new motto will be something different and the original motto will be quickly forgotten.
    suckers......I mean us.

  10. #1710
    Sage

    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Last Seen
    11-20-16 @ 11:40 PM
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    29,242

    Re: Breaking: US S.Ct. Rules Same Sex Marriage Constitutionally Protected[W:320]

    Quote Originally Posted by JoeTrumps View Post
    funny. they get the law passed with the motto "it won't effect you so shut up bigot". then, as it becomes more obvious now and in the future how it WILL effect MANY things, the new motto will be something different and the original motto will be quickly forgotten.
    suckers......I mean us.

    OMG bakers are going to have to (gasp) bake a cake!

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •