reversing the "Chevron" principle as a catch in the court's health care ruling.
They describe Robert's opinion a as masterwork of indirection, though not quite the level of Chief Justice Marshall in Marbury v. Madison.
Roberts is reestablishing that the USSC will determine what the law is, not the executive.
IMHO, I believe Roberts is telling both parties to legislate or he will .
Chemists Have Solutions .
Perhaps someday, you will learn that the US Supreme Court's job is to interpret that law....not write it....which is in fact what they did. Do study the Separation of Powers. The US Supreme Court is of the judicial branch. It is not supposed to be an extension of the legislative branch.
“I think if Thomas Jefferson were looking down, the author of the Bill of Rights, on what’s being proposed here, he’d agree with it. He would agree that the First Amendment cannot be absolute.” - Chuck Schumer (D). Yet, Madison and Mason wrote the Bill of Rights, according to Sheila Jackson Lee, 400 years ago. Yup, it's a fact.
Hey liberals, what about that right wing supreme court? Lol!