Page 105 of 116 FirstFirst ... 55595103104105106107115 ... LastLast
Results 1,041 to 1,050 of 1152

Thread: Police: Multiple Victims in South Carolina church shooting [W:224:1119]

  1. #1041
    warrior of the wetlands
    TurtleDude's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Ohio
    Last Seen
    Today @ 10:19 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Libertarian - Right
    Posts
    157,695

    Re: Police: Multiple Victims in South Carolina church shooting [W:224]

    Quote Originally Posted by Manc Skipper View Post
    Those suicides might be alive if that gun they used wasn't there. They all count in the death toll. If you get a suicidal impulse with a gun handy, you're gone before you can change your mind.
    Gun lovers wade through the blood of innocent victims, braying of thier gun-love.
    I don't care. you want to ban guns in a country you aren't even a citizen of. people like you pretend its about saving victims when its all about punishing lawful gun owners.
    Quote Originally Posted by EarlzP View Post
    Why would you not want to register your weapon?
    Quote Originally Posted by Celebrity View Post
    , as long as you can own one or fewer guns, your right to bear a firearm is not being infringed upon.

  2. #1042
    warrior of the wetlands
    TurtleDude's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Ohio
    Last Seen
    Today @ 10:19 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Libertarian - Right
    Posts
    157,695

    Re: Police: Multiple Victims in South Carolina church shooting [W:224]

    Quote Originally Posted by Threegoofs View Post
    Obsessed? It's a large developed area with almost no gun violence? Why wouldn't a rational person look there for possible solutions?
    why don't you come out and say you want European style gun bans in the USA even though there is no evidence they would work here. but what they will do is harass lawful gun owners which many of us suspect is the real goal of so many gun restrictionists who shed crocodile tears over dead victims
    Quote Originally Posted by EarlzP View Post
    Why would you not want to register your weapon?
    Quote Originally Posted by Celebrity View Post
    , as long as you can own one or fewer guns, your right to bear a firearm is not being infringed upon.

  3. #1043
    Quantum sufficit


    Threegoofs's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    The birthplace of Italian Beef
    Last Seen
    Today @ 10:24 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    22,830

    Re: Police: Multiple Victims in South Carolina church shooting [W:224]

    Quote Originally Posted by TurtleDude View Post
    why don't you come out and say you want European style gun bans in the USA even though there is no evidence they would work here. but what they will do is harass lawful gun owners which many of us suspect is the real goal of so many gun restrictionists who shed crocodile tears over dead victims
    Such a victim.

    I never said I want European style gun bans. But I guess you must have noticed that they are working very well over there, huh?
    Many Trump supporters have lots of problems, and those deplorables are bringing those problems to us. They’re racists. They’re misogynists. They’re islamophobic. They're xenophobes and homophobes. And some, I assume, are good people.

  4. #1044
    The Dude
    Kobie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Location
    Western NY
    Last Seen
    Today @ 10:23 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Liberal
    Posts
    37,932

    Re: Police: Multiple Victims in South Carolina church shooting [W:224]

    Quote Originally Posted by TurtleDude View Post
    I don't care. you want to ban guns in a country you aren't even a citizen of. people like you pretend its about saving victims when its all about punishing lawful gun owners.
    While I have no interest in banning guns, it's a pretty weak argument that those who do hold the sole goal of inconveniencing you, rather than actually hoping to reduce the body count.
    Freedom of speech is not freedom from criticism.

  5. #1045
    warrior of the wetlands
    TurtleDude's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Ohio
    Last Seen
    Today @ 10:19 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Libertarian - Right
    Posts
    157,695

    Re: Police: Multiple Victims in South Carolina church shooting [W:224]

    Quote Originally Posted by Kobie View Post
    While I have no interest in banning guns, it's a pretty weak argument that those who do hold the sole goal of inconveniencing you, rather than actually hoping to reduce the body count.
    well it has been proven. The Hughes amendment was nothing about crime control but spite. and since its illegal for any felon to have any gun, stuff like "assault weapon bans" are clearly designed to harass lawful gun owners. same with Magazine bans or waiting periods

    now some politicians push these bans to pander to the low IQ or low information Sheeple and don't really care about other matters. But there is no doubt that politicians like Feinstein, Biden, and Schemer-Its about trying to hurt the NRA

    once again, the Hughes Amendment proved my argument-and it cannot be rebutted
    Quote Originally Posted by EarlzP View Post
    Why would you not want to register your weapon?
    Quote Originally Posted by Celebrity View Post
    , as long as you can own one or fewer guns, your right to bear a firearm is not being infringed upon.

  6. #1046
    Quantum sufficit


    Threegoofs's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    The birthplace of Italian Beef
    Last Seen
    Today @ 10:24 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    22,830

    Re: Police: Multiple Victims in South Carolina church shooting [W:224]

    Quote Originally Posted by TurtleDude View Post
    well it has been proven. The Hughes amendment was nothing about crime control but spite. and since its illegal for any felon to have any gun, stuff like "assault weapon bans" are clearly designed to harass lawful gun owners. same with Magazine bans or waiting periods

    now some politicians push these bans to pander to the low IQ or low information Sheeple and don't really care about other matters. But there is no doubt that politicians like Feinstein, Biden, and Schemer-Its about trying to hurt the NRA

    once again, the Hughes Amendment proved my argument-and it cannot be rebutted
    Ronald Reagan was a real gun banning nut, huh?

    And while the megalomaniacal angle suits you well, I'm pretty sure it hasn't been 'proven' that the entire point of Hughes was to inconvenience you and you gun buddies.
    Many Trump supporters have lots of problems, and those deplorables are bringing those problems to us. They’re racists. They’re misogynists. They’re islamophobic. They're xenophobes and homophobes. And some, I assume, are good people.

  7. #1047
    warrior of the wetlands
    TurtleDude's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Ohio
    Last Seen
    Today @ 10:19 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Libertarian - Right
    Posts
    157,695

    Re: Police: Multiple Victims in South Carolina church shooting [W:224]

    Quote Originally Posted by Threegoofs View Post
    Ronald Reagan was a real gun banning nut, huh?

    And while the megalomaniacal angle suits you well, I'm pretty sure it hasn't been 'proven' that the entire point of Hughes was to inconvenience you and you gun buddies.
    why are you derailing this point with your Reagan comment.

    the purpose of the Hughes amendment was to derail a pro gun bill

    there was no evidence of it being needed to prevent crimes that weren't happening
    Quote Originally Posted by EarlzP View Post
    Why would you not want to register your weapon?
    Quote Originally Posted by Celebrity View Post
    , as long as you can own one or fewer guns, your right to bear a firearm is not being infringed upon.

  8. #1048
    Global Moderator
    Moderator

    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Last Seen
    @
    Gender
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    28,827

    Re: Police: Multiple Victims in South Carolina church shooting [W:224]

    Quote Originally Posted by Manc Skipper View Post
    Those suicides might be alive if that gun they used wasn't there. They all count in the death toll. If you get a suicidal impulse with a gun handy, you're gone before you can change your mind.
    Gun lovers wade through the blood of innocent victims, braying of thier gun-love.
    If the Daily Mail is to be believed, Brits are extremely creative in the ways they commit suicide. In the absence of guns, those intent on killing themselves do seem to find a way--throwing themselves off roofs and etc.

  9. #1049
    The Dude
    Kobie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Location
    Western NY
    Last Seen
    Today @ 10:23 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Liberal
    Posts
    37,932

    Re: Police: Multiple Victims in South Carolina church shooting [W:224]

    Quote Originally Posted by TurtleDude View Post
    well it has been proven. The Hughes amendment was nothing about crime control but spite. and since its illegal for any felon to have any gun, stuff like "assault weapon bans" are clearly designed to harass lawful gun owners. same with Magazine bans or waiting periods

    now some politicians push these bans to pander to the low IQ or low information Sheeple and don't really care about other matters. But there is no doubt that politicians like Feinstein, Biden, and Schemer-Its about trying to hurt the NRA

    once again, the Hughes Amendment proved my argument-and it cannot be rebutted
    Repeating the claim doesn't make it more true.

    What about the Hughes Amendment proves your theory?
    Freedom of speech is not freedom from criticism.

  10. #1050
    The Dude
    Kobie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Location
    Western NY
    Last Seen
    Today @ 10:23 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Liberal
    Posts
    37,932

    Re: Police: Multiple Victims in South Carolina church shooting [W:224]

    Quote Originally Posted by nota bene View Post
    If the Daily Mail is to be believed, Brits are extremely creative in the ways they commit suicide. In the absence of guns, those intent on killing themselves do seem to find a way--throwing themselves off roofs and etc.
    Eh, the Daily Mail will run the more sensational stuff, but anecdotes aren't data.
    Freedom of speech is not freedom from criticism.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •