• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Mitt Romney gives a brutal PowerPoint critique of Obama’s foreign policy

You lost it four years ago. Sour grapes! He knows how to make a PowerPoint presentation?

Mitt Romney gives a brutal PowerPoint critique of Obama’s foreign policy - The Washington Post

Thanks for posting this. Not, judging from your OP, that you had the slightest interest in the content of the linked article.

From the WaPo article: The presentation hinted at the kind of president Romney would have been — technocratic and hawkish. At one point, he showed how he would have reorganized the State Department bureaucracy by dividing the map into color-coded regions to exert soft power, much the way military commanders do at the Pentagon.
 
Μολὼν λαβέ;1064717139 said:
It doesn't matter to liberal lemmings. To everyone else it does. Let me help you evaluate the president you voted for on his foreign policy.



You know, the JV team.



The war had been won until Obama took over.


Obama had no problem ousting heads of government in other regions of the ME but not Iran. Why, liberal fear?



The result of a lack of forethought and insight.



More lack of forethought by backing down and showing weakness.



Deja Vu - Iraq all over gain





https://www.commentarymagazine.com/...p-obamas-cataclysmic-foreign-policy-failures/

Add to those the ME apology tour, Arab Spring and Yemen.

There still seem to be numerous liberals who act as if Obama just strolled into office last week rather than more than 6 years ago. That Obama may have inherited a mess is no longer the issue. That what he inherited is now much worse, is. Blaming Bush in year 7 of the Obama administration is nothing more than an admission of the failure of the Obama administration
 
I'm glad the USA lost the war in IRAQ simply because it was started under Bush's Presidency!!

Yea bring it on Isis is eating up those freedom fries!!

We will be greeted as Liberators, LOL..

The insurgents are dying out, Cheyney in 2005!!

We have to fight them over there, or they will come get us over here! That's my favorite one!!

Saddam has WMDS:lamo..

Bring it on!!! Gee Isis is bringing it!!

What happened to Condis mushroom cloud????

Rumsfeld rummy dummy it will be a 2 month war!! Really???

Freedom fries, golly jeez, for being free that was a real expensive war huh??

Bush signed the sofa treaty act to have all USA, forces out by Dec 31 2011, figures all you dumb**** conservatives forgot about that huh??

Psst. Its not 2005, its 2015. Obama is president. Save your anger and hatred for summer camp battle ball.
 
So we elect Governors for no reason at all, hmmmmm OK the state legislation runs everything, the Gov sits around all day and does NOTHING, OK I get it..

I guess what your telling me is Romney was elected Gov to take orders from the states Liberals, OK that makes a lot of sense..

That's as ill-informed as your previous posts. Guess you've never heard of the checks and balances of power.

To with: Romney the sole person(s) to blame for Mass jobs malaise? No.

State legislature to blame for the Mass jobs malaise? No.

Blame them both? Most reasonable and probably most accurate.

The above sounds to me a lot like the argument of whether all of the ills from Pandora's box actually come from Obama, or whether the Congress of the US may have something to do with economic malaise and foreign policy disasters as well.

I suppose some have to root for their team, and if the opposite team has the executive branch, you lay blame there. If the opposite team has the legislative branch, that's the problem.

The governor's role, much like the presidents, is to lead the executive branch as well as to lead the legislature, compromising when needed in some cases, and sticking to position and principal in some cases when needed to accomplish 'the art of the possible' which is what politics is all about.

The end result, which is the over all goal of this form of government, is to do what's best for the electorate both in the short term and the longer term. It's not about winning for your team, nor scorched earth political combat, at least from my view.
 
**** Romney, his old ass is still pissed he lost 4 years ago, very fortunately He will see the grave before he ever sits in the WH..

He was a failure as Gov of Massachusetts, probably couldn't run a taco stand in Tijuana, and he wanted to be President:lamo

Typical response from a progressive who doesn't know much about Romney...except that he doesn't like him.

1. Not aware (consciously, I think) that Romney has successfully run operations that are much more complicated than a taco stand.

But hey, I'll be happy to educate you (shove in your face, that is) on his accomplishments by providing freely available information about him.

Raised in Bloomfield Hills, Michigan, by his parents George and Lenore Romney, Mitt Romney spent two and a half years in France as a Mormon missionary starting in 1966. He married Ann Davies in 1969, and their five children are all sons. By 1971, Romney had participated in the political campaigns of both of his parents. In that year, he earned a Bachelor of Arts at Brigham Young and in 1975, a joint Juris Doctor and Master of Business Administration at Harvard. Romney then entered the management consulting industry and in 1977 secured a position at Bain & Company. Later serving as its chief executive officer, he helped lead the company out of financial crisis. In 1984, he cofounded and led the spin-off company Bain Capital, a highly profitable private equity investment firm that became one of the largest of its kind in the nation. Active in The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, Romney served during his business career as the bishop of his ward (head of his local congregation) and then stake president in his home area near Boston. After stepping down from Bain Capital and his local leadership role in the church, he ran as the Republican candidate in the 1994 Massachusetts election for U.S. Senate. Upon losing to longtime incumbent Ted Kennedy, he resumed his position at Bain Capital. Years later, a successful stint as president and CEO of the Salt Lake Organizing Committee for the 2002 Winter Olympics led to a relaunch of his political career.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mitt_Romney

Oh...and yeah...as a Republican, he was elected Governor of one of the most liberal States, Democratic strongholds and home to Ted Kennedy. Sounds to ME like he did much more than "run a taco stand".

2. Again, in typical progressive fashion you decline to address the actual topic of this thread...that is, Romney's assessment of Obama's foreign policy. I'm thinking you don't really have a defense for Obama, do you?
 
Seems to me that the worst failings of the Obama administration foreign policy aren't much different from that of the previous administration. By encouraging the toppling of the strong-armed leaders of primitive societies, he has continued a pattern established by Bush, and what has been unleashed in the process is all as predictable as when Bush did so.

Blaming Obama's Foreign Policy decisions on Bush....

Wow !
 
If Obama wanted to demonstrate why people around the world should no longer rely on the USA for dependable security? Why, he has over achieved.
It's Obama's quest to have other countries take personal responsibility for their own safety. Obama's been working for the G.O.P. all along!
 
Typical response from a progressive who doesn't know much about Romney...except that he doesn't like him.

1. Not aware (consciously, I think) that Romney has successfully run operations that are much more complicated than a taco stand.

But hey, I'll be happy to educate you (shove in your face, that is) on his accomplishments by providing freely available information about him.



Oh...and yeah...as a Republican, he was elected Governor of one of the most liberal States, Democratic strongholds and home to Ted Kennedy. Sounds to ME like he did much more than "run a taco stand".

2. Again, in typical progressive fashion you decline to address the actual topic of this thread...that is, Romney's assessment of Obama's foreign policy. I'm thinking you don't really have a defense for Obama, do you?
I don't Have to defend Obama from anything he won remember..

Since your President of the Mitt Romney fan club tell me why Mr corporations are People was so brutally beaten in 12, by a guy Repugs, and the Tea Maggots call a failure in Obama??, especially when he was such A God, if Obama is such a pile of Manure what does that make the guy he blasted??:lamo

Romney according to you is so great will forever be remembered as a corporate raider, who ran one of the stupidest Campaigns in history basically telling the whole wide World how much he hates the poor..

**** Mr 47%, and I'm glad all of the garbage Repugs are still simmering in their own piss and waste, because Obama is sitting in the WH, and Romney is still bitter, LOL..
 
Blaming Obama's Foreign Policy decisions on Bush....

Wow !

Bush invaded Iraq remember, Obama in 2002, was just a guy with a funny name back then..

And newsflash we are still in Iraq!!

What does that tell you??

Oh yea your a Con, chest thumping Cons live for War!! But hate it when it blows up in their faces, so they blame a guy Who took office a full 6 years after the War was launched..
 
That's as ill-informed as your previous posts. Guess you've never heard of the checks and balances of power.

To with: Romney the sole person(s) to blame for Mass jobs malaise? No.

State legislature to blame for the Mass jobs malaise? No.

Blame them both? Most reasonable and probably most accurate.



The governor's role, much like the presidents, is to lead the executive branch as well as to lead the legislature, compromising when needed in some cases, and sticking to position and principal in some cases when needed to accomplish 'the art of the possible' which is what politics is all about.

The end result, which is the over all goal of this form of government, is to do what's best for the electorate both in the short term and the longer term. It's not about winning for your team, nor scorched earth political combat, at least from my view.

Greetings, Erik. :2wave:

Since negotiating is an important part of life when several different ideas are on the table - and that applies in our personal as well as business lives - and since I had nearly given up hope that it might be used again sometime in the political arena, it's heartening to see that the art hasn't been lost, and cooperation to achieve what's best for "we the people" might again be possible! Both sides can claim success, and that makes it a win-win in my opinion. Business has long been successful in doing that when negotiating with unions, as an example, and it's only when one side digs their heels in and won't budge that everyone loses - companies close and move elsewhere; jobs are lost that won't be replaced; the economy suffers creating family stress - all for what? Where's the upside? :thumbdown:
 
I don't Have to defend Obama from anything he won remember..

Since your President of the Mitt Romney fan club tell me why Mr corporations are People was so brutally beaten in 12, by a guy Repugs, and the Tea Maggots call a failure in Obama??, especially when he was such A God, if Obama is such a pile of Manure what does that make the guy he blasted??:lamo

Romney according to you is so great will forever be remembered as a corporate raider, who ran one of the stupidest Campaigns in history basically telling the whole wide World how much he hates the poor..

**** Mr 47%, and I'm glad all of the garbage Repugs are still simmering in their own piss and waste, because Obama is sitting in the WH, and Romney is still bitter, LOL..

Ummm...yeah. So you are just going to double down, eh?

Nobody is asking you to defend Obama for winning an election. Heck, that election was almost 3 years ago. Most people have moved on from that. Why can't you?

No, what I'm interested in is if you can find a way to defend Obama's foreign policy blunders or, at least, show how Romney is wrong about Obama's actions.

Actually, I don't blame you for going off topic by insisting on bad-mouthing Romney. I'd have a hard time finding anything good that Obama has done regarding any issue, let alone foreign policy.
 
And newsflash we are still in Iraq!!

What does that tell you??


It tells me that Obama screwed the pooch. He was supposed to get us OUT of Iraq, wasn't he?

But, you know...nobody is surprised by that when they consider how much Obama has screwed up all over the world. I mean, pick an area...any area...Obama has screwed up in it.

Oh, wait...I forgot. He DID kill bin Laden...heck, he wants YOU to believe he pulled the damned trigger. LOL!!
 
Ummm...yeah. So you are just going to double down, eh?

Nobody is asking you to defend Obama for winning an election. Heck, that election was almost 3 years ago. Most people have moved on from that. Why can't you?

No, what I'm interested in is if you can find a way to defend Obama's foreign policy blunders or, at least, show how Romney is wrong about Obama's actions.

Actually, I don't blame you for going off topic by insisting on bad-mouthing Romney. I'd have a hard time finding anything good that Obama has done regarding any issue, let alone foreign policy.
When the Big bad USA stops trying to be the Worlds Police, then THERE WON'T BE ANY MORE FOREIGN POLICY issues huh???

I'm personally glad the USA failed in Iraq because it was started under drunk Bush, under false BS..

And I'm glad that 2010 Afghanistan surge (by Obama ) failed too!! Sorry Afghanistan was a loss, LOL..

Just like Cons wanted the ACA to fail I want all of their Wars to fail!! What's good for the goose is good for the gander..

American Imperialism isn't so mighty anymore huh???:lamo..

If the Iraq people don't even want to help themselves why should this country always try to bail their sorry asses out??

Funny how Cons hate Big Government, and wasteful spending, but love spending on unwinnable **** Wars that last for decades..
 
It tells me that Obama screwed the pooch. He was supposed to get us OUT of Iraq, wasn't he?

But, you know...nobody is surprised by that when they consider how much Obama has screwed up all over the world. I mean, pick an area...any area...Obama has screwed up in it.

Oh, wait...I forgot. He DID kill bin Laden...heck, he wants YOU to believe he pulled the damned trigger. LOL!!

Yep Bush signed the sofa agreement , and the deal with the Iraq Government was an out date of Dec 31 2011.

At least Obama prevented another 9-11 unlike drunk Bush, LOL..

Gee Iraq was started 6 years before Obama took office, it wasn't his war, nice try but that Bull**** won't fly here..

Gee didn't Rumsfeld say it was only going to be a 2, month war??

Where are those WMDS??

So we still have to fight them over there to keep them from coming over here?, LoL..

I thought according to Dick the insurgency was dying out in 2005??

Freedom fries, ???

Bring it on, WELL THEY BROUGHT IT!!

NOW WHO SCREWED UP FOREIGN POLICY AGAIN????¿???
 
Last edited:
One function of our government is to protect American interests abroad. We live in a global economy and we are interdependent on other nations. We have interests in the middle east since so much of the global economy depends on their crude oil. We have relationships, treaties and alliances with countries in the region. Like it or not we will maintain a presence there. The question is will there be counties left their to trade with after the spread of Islamofascism.

The spread of Islamofascism was exacerbated due to dumbya's silly war on Iraq, which removed the only regime that was keeping that Islamofascism in check.

We could ask conservatives 456,789,234 times why O or any other US civilian should be responsible for cleaning up the mess made by dumbya, but we'd never get an answer.
 
One function of our government is to protect American interests abroad.

The US govt. no longer does that. Rather, it protects US corporate interests abroad.
 
I'm glad the USA lost the war in IRAQ simply because it was started under Bush's Presidency!!

Yes, dumbya did blow it in Iraq. Thanks for acknowledging that.
 
I don't Have to defend Obama from anything he won remember..

Since your President of the Mitt Romney fan club tell me why Mr corporations are People was so brutally beaten in 12, by a guy Repugs, and the Tea Maggots call a failure in Obama??, especially when he was such A God, if Obama is such a pile of Manure what does that make the guy he blasted??:lamo

Romney according to you is so great will forever be remembered as a corporate raider, who ran one of the stupidest Campaigns in history basically telling the whole wide World how much he hates the poor..

**** Mr 47%, and I'm glad all of the garbage Repugs are still simmering in their own piss and waste, because Obama is sitting in the WH, and Romney is still bitter, LOL..

When you're content with just being elected after Obama's 6 1/2 years in office it shows you have no other achievement to identify, much less celebrate.

Its pretty obvious from your posts. At least you get to wallow in it for another 1 1/2 years.
 
Yes, dumbya did blow it in Iraq. Thanks for acknowledging that.

" Blow it " ?

Iraq went from a Nation where its own people ( even women ) could vote in open elections to be overrun with Islamo terrorist.

Elections matter, and the Millions of idiot voters who attributed talking points and bumper sticker slogans to Presidential qualifications in 2008 and 2012 are to a large degree responsible for the destabilization of the Middle east.

They're responsible for Obama
 
That's as ill-informed as your previous posts. Guess you've never heard of the checks and balances of power.

To with: Romney the sole person(s) to blame for Mass jobs malaise? No.

State legislature to blame for the Mass jobs malaise? No.

Blame them both? Most reasonable and probably most accurate.



The governor's role, much like the presidents, is to lead the executive branch as well as to lead the legislature, compromising when needed in some cases, and sticking to position and principal in some cases when needed to accomplish 'the art of the possible' which is what politics is all about.

The end result, which is the over all goal of this form of government, is to do what's best for the electorate both in the short term and the longer term. It's not about winning for your team, nor scorched earth political combat, at least from my view.

From my point of view, that's what it should be about. Unfortunately, partisanship in Washington has totally perverted that ideal.
 
Yea HALLIBURTON and the defense industry's..

The GOP is their Whore.

What a ignorant post.

You realize Clinton gave Halliburton their first " No Bid " contract, right ?

Yep, during his Kosovo redirect
 
Back
Top Bottom