• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Carson: Gay rights aren't the same as civil rights

AGENT J

"If you ain't first, you're last"
Banned
DP Veteran
Joined
Apr 25, 2010
Messages
80,422
Reaction score
29,075
Location
Pittsburgh
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Independent
[h=1]Carson: Gay rights aren't the same as civil rights[/h]
Washington (CNN)Ben Carson said Wednesday night that he was "irritated" by the comparison between the fight for same-sex marriage rights and the Civil Rights Movement because there's no overt segregation against gays.

Speaking on Fox News' "Special Report", Carson elaborated on his remarks on CNN in March that he believes being gay is a choice because people "go into prison straight -- and when they come out, they're gay."

Carson: Gay rights aren't the same as civil rights - CNNPolitics.com


:lamo:2funny::2rofll:

wow, just wow . . . .

on this particular issue it really doesn't get anymore dumb than that comment. Just another example of why he will never be president.
How can a person be so smart in one area and completely mentally inane in another. . . . weird . . . this is worthy of moron of the week
 
For a smart guy Carson is pretty stupid.
 
Carson: Gay rights aren't the same as civil rights - CNNPolitics.com


:lamo:2funny::2rofll:

wow, just wow . . . .

on this particular issue it really doesn't get anymore dumb than that comment. Just another example of why he will never be president.
How can a person be so smart in one area and completely mentally inane in another. . . . weird . . . this is worthy of moron of the week

You know, I really don't much care for Carson's thinking about gays, but holy **** did you deceptively edit that clip from the story. Here is the very next sentence:

The GOP presidential contender told host Brett Baier that he "shouldn't have allowed my emotions" into the conversation, but was reacting to CNN host Chris Cuomo's line of questioning on the issue.

Instead of big bold letters of a bright color of what he said some time ago, with no explanation, you might have included that sentence where he starts to explain his thinking and his mistake. If you have to be so dishonest to make a point, that is a problem with you, and you might want to stop advocating for gays since you harm them more than you help with **** like this.
 
You know, I really don't much care for Carson's thinking about gays, but holy **** did you deceptively edit that clip from the story. Here is the very next sentence:



Instead of big bold letters of a bright color of what he said some time ago, with no explanation, you might have included that sentence where he starts to explain his thinking and his mistake. If you have to be so dishonest to make a point, that is a problem with you, and you might want to stop advocating for gays since you harm them more than you help with **** like this.

weird how did you find that . .. . oh thats right the very link "I" included . . . yep real deceptive on my part LMAO you really got me . .
yes he said that on another show after a **** storm fell on him, yeaaaaaa lol
take your own advice and stop making stuff up in your head and acting like its true, thats the deception and huge fail of your post .:laughat:
 
I agree with him when he says the gay rights movement is not the same as the civil rights movement. You cant really compare the gay rights movement of today to discrimination of blacks during the civil rights movement. The two are nowhere near close. I am not saying that to in anyway diminish the importance of equal rights, but it is really not the same.
 
You know, I really don't much care for Carson's thinking about gays, but holy **** did you deceptively edit that clip from the story. Here is the very next sentence:



Instead of big bold letters of a bright color of what he said some time ago, with no explanation, you might have included that sentence where he starts to explain his thinking and his mistake. If you have to be so dishonest to make a point, that is a problem with you, and you might want to stop advocating for gays since you harm them more than you help with **** like this.

Where is the mistake? It isn't as if he said that he was wrong....he gave an apology that wasn't really an apology. He still actually believes what he said, he's just saying that he shouldn't have said it. Doh!
 
I agree with him when he says the gay rights movement is not the same as the civil rights movement. You cant really compare the gay rights movement of today to discrimination of blacks during the civil rights movement. The two are nowhere near close. I am not saying that to in anyway diminish the importance of equal rights, but it is really not the same.

I don't think anyone has ever tried to say that they are the same. But they involve similar issues and it is fair to draw comparisons to the two. Just because you compare two movements does not mean that you are equating them.
Carson is an idiot.
 
I don't think anyone has ever tried to say that they are the same. But they involve similar issues and it is fair to draw comparisons to the two. Just because you compare two movements does not mean that you are equating them.
Carson is an idiot.

Particularly since the arguments currently made against same-sex marriage are basically word-for-word copies of the arguments that were made against interracial marriage. If you're gonna make the same arguments as those guys, I'm going to draw the comparison to try and highlight why you are wrong! Don't know why that bothers Christians so much.
 
I agree with him when he says the gay rights movement is not the same as the civil rights movement. You cant really compare the gay rights movement of today to discrimination of blacks during the civil rights movement. The two are nowhere near close. I am not saying that to in anyway diminish the importance of equal rights, but it is really not the same.

I dont know anybody that has ever said they are the same in regards to suffering, slaver etc, that would just be stupid and I agree they are not the same in that regard . . while gays have been killed and fired and defined service that overall scope of the discrimination is not nearly the sam


where they are in fact that same though is they are both equal rights issues, they are civil rights issues . . . and it is a matter of people fighting to not be treated as lessers . . civil rights is not soley and only about blacks its about equality and in that regard they are the same and many court cases have already referred to this factual similarity . . .
 
I dont know anybody that has ever said they are the same in regards to suffering, slaver etc, that would just be stupid and I agree they are not the same in that regard . . while gays have been killed and fired and defined service that overall scope of the discrimination is not nearly the sam


where they are in fact that same though is they are both equal rights issues, they are civil rights issues . . . and it is a matter of people fighting to not be treated as lessers . . civil rights is not soley and only about blacks its about equality and in that regard they are the same and many court cases have already referred to this factual similarity . . .

Discrimination of gays today during the gay rights movement is nothing compared to the civil rights movement of the 60's. It's not. No matter how much you want them to be, no matter how many times you reply it won't be. As I said before, I am not saying people shouldn't fight for rights and what they believe is right, but not all movements are the same.
 
Particularly since the arguments currently made against same-sex marriage are basically word-for-word copies of the arguments that were made against interracial marriage. If you're gonna make the same arguments as those guys, I'm going to draw the comparison to try and highlight why you are wrong! Don't know why that bothers Christians so much.

What on earth does comparing two movements have to do with religion? Nothing anyone on here said had anything to do with religion.
 
1.)Discrimination of gays today during the gay rights movement is nothing compared to the civil rights movement of the 60's. It's not. No matter how much you want them to be, no matter how many times you reply it won't be. As I said before, I am not saying people shouldn't fight for rights and what they believe is right, but not all movements are the same.

yes thats why i said they are not :shrug:
in fact i said comparing them would be stupid

maybe read the post next time because no matter what you WANTED it to say it did not and no matter how many times you reply i never said the lie you claim i did
Let me know if theres any other mistakes of yours i can help you with LMAO, you're welcome
 
I agree with him when he says the gay rights movement is not the same as the civil rights movement. You cant really compare the gay rights movement of today to discrimination of blacks during the civil rights movement. The two are nowhere near close. I am not saying that to in anyway diminish the importance of equal rights, but it is really not the same.

Comparing two things is not the same thing as saying the two things are the same.
 
Discrimination of gays today during the gay rights movement is nothing compared to the civil rights movement of the 60's. It's not. No matter how much you want them to be, no matter how many times you reply it won't be. As I said before, I am not saying people shouldn't fight for rights and what they believe is right, but not all movements are the same.

So being beaten up or killed, or losing one's job, is "nothing"?
 
What on earth does comparing two movements have to do with religion? Nothing anyone on here said had anything to do with religion.

Christians tend to be the ones on the other side of the argument, and are the ones who act all insulted when I point out the similarities between their arguments and the ones against interracial marriage several decades ago. (it's against tradition, it's unnatural, it's against the will of god, it's against the will of the people, etc etc)
 
Particularly since the arguments currently made against same-sex marriage are basically word-for-word copies of the arguments that were made against interracial marriage. If you're gonna make the same arguments as those guys, I'm going to draw the comparison to try and highlight why you are wrong! Don't know why that bothers Christians so much.

it doesn't

it only bothers a particular type of Christian. One who is a bigot but yet also happens to claim Christianity.
But in reality thier defensiveness about being a biogt has nothgin to do with Christianity, even if they or others try to make it. THeres nothing in Christianity that forces a person to be against equal rights. Its sad that some Christians try to sell that lie.
 
gay rights are urgent urges, civil rights can wait as always!
 
Back
Top Bottom