Page 15 of 20 FirstFirst ... 51314151617 ... LastLast
Results 141 to 150 of 195

Thread: Obama says Supreme Court should never have taken up health law case

  1. #141
    Sage
    Montecresto's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Last Seen
    03-13-16 @ 10:59 PM
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    24,561
    Killing one person is murder, killing 100,000 is foreign policy

  2. #142
    Outer space potato man

    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Last Seen
    Today @ 12:43 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    48,518

    Re: Obama says Supreme Court should never have taken up health law case

    Quote Originally Posted by jmotivator View Post
    ... which is what they are hoping the SCOTUS rules.

    Yes, they are hoping the Supreme Court decides they shouldn't be taking up marriage cases because they have no jurisdiction, the state's do.
    Quote Originally Posted by calamity View Post
    Well, certainly the customer is not an N-word.
    Quote Originally Posted by apdst View Post
    You know her?

  3. #143
    Sage
    jmotivator's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Virginia
    Last Seen
    05-19-17 @ 06:13 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Conservative
    Posts
    15,325

    Re: Obama says Supreme Court should never have taken up health law case

    Quote Originally Posted by Montecresto View Post
    My comment was directed at his last line in post number six, and not the portion you loosely quoted. Which looks to me to quite well define any tax money. Apparently another poster saw it that way as well.
    So, like I said, you weren't actually commenting on the totality of Conservative's post, just pulling a line out of context and attacking it.

    In context Conservative's final line means that he does not like taxes gathered for Social Security, for instance, going to pay for the EITC. People should know how much of their money is going to wealth redistribution programs by line-item taxing to fund it.
    Give a man a fish and he eats for a day. Teach a man to fish and he stops voting for the Free Fish party.

  4. #144
    Outer space potato man

    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Last Seen
    Today @ 12:43 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    48,518

    Re: Obama says Supreme Court should never have taken up health law case

    Quote Originally Posted by jmotivator View Post
    So, like I said, you weren't actually commenting on the totality of Conservative's post, just pulling a line out of context and attacking it.

    In context Conservative's final line means that he does not like taxes gathered for Social Security, for instance, going to pay for the EITC. People should know how much of their money is going to wealth redistribution programs by line-item taxing to fund it.
    Can we also line-item the DOD budget and separately line-item the Iraq and Afghanistan wars?
    Quote Originally Posted by calamity View Post
    Well, certainly the customer is not an N-word.
    Quote Originally Posted by apdst View Post
    You know her?

  5. #145
    Sage
    Conservative's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Houston, TX
    Last Seen
    Today @ 08:40 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Conservative
    Posts
    64,181

    Re: Obama says Supreme Court should never have taken up health law case

    Wow, any more leftwing sites to post from? Just another reason to destroy the Unified Budget and put your taxes where they belong FICA funds SS and Medicare and shouldn't be used for anything other than those two issues. People contributed their money into SS and Medicare through payroll taxes. They deserve that those programs promised when created. Those were self funding programs until LBJ put them on budget

  6. #146
    Sage
    Conservative's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Houston, TX
    Last Seen
    Today @ 08:40 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Conservative
    Posts
    64,181

    Re: Obama says Supreme Court should never have taken up health law case

    Quote Originally Posted by Deuce View Post
    Can we also line-item the DOD budget and separately line-item the Iraq and Afghanistan wars?
    Last time I checked, Provide for the Common defense was in the Constitution and thus a requirement of our govt. I find no place where healthcare is listed, marriage, abortion or any other leftwing social issue.

  7. #147
    Outer space potato man

    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Last Seen
    Today @ 12:43 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    48,518

    Re: Obama says Supreme Court should never have taken up health law case

    Quote Originally Posted by Conservative View Post
    Last time I checked, Provide for the Common defense was in the Constitution and thus a requirement of our govt. I find no place where healthcare is listed, marriage, abortion or any other leftwing social issue.
    Ok, so line item taxation should only apply to things that you personally want it to. Got it.
    Quote Originally Posted by calamity View Post
    Well, certainly the customer is not an N-word.
    Quote Originally Posted by apdst View Post
    You know her?

  8. #148
    Sage
    Conservative's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Houston, TX
    Last Seen
    Today @ 08:40 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Conservative
    Posts
    64,181

    Re: Obama says Supreme Court should never have taken up health law case

    Quote Originally Posted by Deuce View Post
    Ok, so line item taxation should only apply to things that you personally want it to. Got it.
    Read the Constitution and learn the role and expenses of the Federal Govt.

  9. #149
    Guru
    Samhain's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    Northern Ohio
    Last Seen
    Today @ 08:20 AM
    Lean
    Conservative
    Posts
    3,795

    Re: Obama says Supreme Court should never have taken up health law case

    Quote Originally Posted by MrT View Post
    Well, before too long, such a subsidy will be required - essentially a guaranteed salary for everyone. Within the next 30-40 years, roughly HALF of all jobs available today will be obsolete because of computers and robots. At that point, you really are staring at a bunch of no-win situations. Either one half of the population lives without a salary and you hope that they die without creating too much chaos for society. Or you divide the income of the remaining jobs such that individuals who are not employed will still be able to afford necessities.
    Why wait? Nationalize everything now, give every Man/Woman/Child a $22,000 salary and call it a day.

  10. #150
    Sage
    jmotivator's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Virginia
    Last Seen
    05-19-17 @ 06:13 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Conservative
    Posts
    15,325

    Re: Obama says Supreme Court should never have taken up health law case

    Quote Originally Posted by Deuce View Post
    Yes, they are hoping the Supreme Court decides they shouldn't be taking up marriage cases because they have no jurisdiction, the state's do.
    Nope. They are hoping that the SCOTUS interprets the Constitution the same way they do. After all, they believe that the Constitution is what limits the power of the federal Government and the SCOTUS rules on constitutional matters, so who else would you expect to enforce constitutional limits on Federal power?
    Give a man a fish and he eats for a day. Teach a man to fish and he stops voting for the Free Fish party.

Page 15 of 20 FirstFirst ... 51314151617 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •