Libertie76
Banned
- Joined
- Oct 9, 2014
- Messages
- 2,143
- Reaction score
- 313
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Libertarian
It isn't a yes or a no, your question was loaded and had nothing to do with your initial claim. You want to take the Old Testament on its own to show what Christianity says about killing homosexuals and ignore the new Testament that clearly states that your interpretation is bogus. I mean, maybe you should be arguing this with people who are Jewish or Muslim as their religious texts don't significantly change the Old Testament with later revelations, but your ignorant focus on the Old Testament as Christian law is false.
Again, it is stupid because you are taking the old law and trying to apply it to Christians who have a New Testament to guide them. As my Matthew quote clearly shows the Old Testament "Eye for an Eye" is not the law for Christians.
Ummm... you seem to have a problem with the English language. You want to claim it is a "fact" that Christianity killed millions of people and then argue that you can't prove it because it is speculative.
I shouldn;'t have to explain this to you, but... speculation isn't fact.
You can't present evidence that the book cited actually says what he is claiming, I am telling you the historical FACTS about the Battle of Belgrade. Muslims attacked the Christian City of Belgrade and were routed. This is not a Christian atrocity as the nimrod you quoted wants to claim.
No, you can't. You are trying to prove the rule with exceptions. It's a logical dead end.
1. You stated Christians don't believe in the Old Testament, so I'm asking do they preach from it. It's not loaded it's a completely logical question you are refusing to answer because you know you're wrong. Do gay bashing Christians quote he Old Testament?
2. So why include the Old Testament into the bible
3. I say that it has killed the most people aside from disease is speculative, but there is ample proof to the claim that Christianity has killed millions of people
4. I really don't care as I have said ample times. I said he gives a reference be a scholar and do your research. This is literally one claim you went against over all the other ones I'm not refuting you at all
5. I can't want? Blaine atheism for he deaths in the ussr and Maoist china? Yes I can considering they were both athiests and communism hates religion because it divides the masses. I'm not making any exception. It's a very logical claim