U.s. Vulnerable to north korean nuke attack

[Ironfist17]

U.S. vulnerable to North Korean nuke attack
Are we really able to defend ourselves from North Korean nukes (if they have any lol)? There are too many crazy leaders in the world capable to launch nukes now. Does the missile defense system work well enough? A nuclear winter caused by some crazy communist or jihadist is not something I want to see in my lifetime. Well maybe it's time to stop the crazy dictator from threatening us with his non-existing missiles before he made the real ones?

 

[Jetboogieman]

World nut daily.

Nough said.

 

[OrphanSlug]

 

[xdangerousxdave]

Well anyway their leader understands that one nuclear attack can break the biological balance all over the world, so I bet North Korean government play some games with ours.

 

[Ikari]

U.S. vulnerable to North Korean nuke attack
Are we really able to defend ourselves from North Korean nukes (if they have any lol)? There are too many crazy leaders in the world capable to launch nukes now. Does the missile defense system work well enough? A nuclear winter caused by some crazy communist or jihadist is not something I want to see in my lifetime. Well maybe it's time to stop the crazy dictator from threatening us with his non-existing missiles before he made the real ones?

Bwaaahahahahahaha

Wait, were they serious? I'll laugh harder.

 

[Helix]

U.S. Vulnerable to North Korean nuke attack

let me guess : the solution is preemptive war against NK, but without raising taxes to pay for it.

 

[Lord Tammerlain]

Well anyway their leader understands that one nuclear attack can break the biological balance all over the world, so I bet North Korean government play some games with ours.

One nuclear attack would do that?


By god we must all be dead as two count them two nuclear attacks were made in WW2,

Not to mention all of the above ground nuclear tests done in the past.

Or

One or two nuclear attack by North Korea would be extremely horrible for the people caught in them, but the world would live on, and most likely the places hit by the nukes livable in few years (see Hiroshima)

 

[Reformedfindlay]

Well anyway their leader understands that one nuclear attack can break the biological balance all over the world, so I bet North Korean government play some games with ours.

You cannot honestly believe that...

Especially when the kind of nukes we're talking about are NK's "village-buster" class nukes :lamo

 

[Kobie]

U.S. vulnerable to North Korean nuke attack
Are we really able to defend ourselves from North Korean nukes (if they have any lol)? There are too many crazy leaders in the world capable to launch nukes now. Does the missile defense system work well enough? A nuclear winter caused by some crazy communist or jihadist is not something I want to see in my lifetime. Well maybe it's time to stop the crazy dictator from threatening us with his non-existing missiles before he made the real ones?

World Net Daily is not "mainstream media." You posted this in the wrong forum.

 

[Kobie]

Yeah, so I got off the boat and read the article. There's some wacky stuff in there.

The U.S. anti-missile nuclear defense system established to defend against a North Korean missile attack is plagued with technical flaws that make it inadequate, a new U.S. government report concludes.

However, even if the technical problems were resolved, former Strategic Defense Initiative director Ambassador Henry Cooper warns in a report from Joseph Farah’s G2 Bulletin that a North Korean satellite could come over the undefended South Pole and detonate a high-altitude nuclear weapon, causing an electromagnetic pulse event for which the U.S. is virtually defenseless.

The U.S. Government Accountability Office report said there are serious technical flaws in the anti-missile interceptors in the U.S. defense system, which focuses on an attack from the north, raising U.S. vulnerability to a North Korean nuclear attack.

1. Using a satellite as a delivery system for a nuclear weapon is like something out of a bad spy movie.

2. From Pyongyang around the South Pole to the United States is approximately 17,000 miles. If the Norks launched anything on that trajectory, we'd be aware of it, and could eliminate it before it became a threat.

“If North Korea can build a viable nuclear warhead weighing 220 pounds or less, then they already have the proven means for delivering it to detonate at the optimum altitude over Omaha to produce an EMP that covers the entire continental U.S.,” Cooper warned.

IF North Korea has nuclear weapons, it certainly doesn't have one that could produce an EMP that could cover the entire continental United States.

 

[poweRob]

One nuclear attack would do that?


By god we must all be dead as two count them two nuclear attacks were made in WW2,

Not to mention all of the above ground nuclear tests done in the past.

Or

One or two nuclear attack by North Korea would be extremely horrible for the people caught in them, but the world would live on, and most likely the places hit by the nukes livable in few years (see Hiroshima)

That made me curious soooo...... I looked it up.

List of nuclear weapons tests - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Total nuclear tests: 2,119