"I believe that man will not merely endure: he will prevail. He is immortal, not because he alone among creatures has an inexhaustible voice, but because he has a soul, a spirit capable of compassion and sacrifice and endurance." William Faulkner
People are only being sarcastic from the GOP when they're called on it.
Then they backpedal with **** on their face.
StillBallin has already called you out in an outstanding manner about YER dishonest OP.
Chemists Have Solutions .
As for Stillballin, hasn't had the courage to engage me directly in a few years. He will dish out the insults, but then runs like a coward... Such an upstanding guy and forum roll model.
The rest of your post was nothing more than your typical babbling.
- Colonel Paul YinglingNobody who wins a war indulges in a bifurcated definition of victory. War is a political act; victory and defeat have meaning only in political terms. A country incapable of achieving its political objectives at an acceptable cost is losing the war, regardless of battlefield events.
Bifurcating victory (e.g. winning militarily, losing politically) is a useful salve for defeated armies. The "stab in the back" narrative helped take the sting out of failure for German generals after WWI and their American counterparts after Vietnam.
All the same, it's nonsense. To paraphrase Vince Lombardi, show me a political loser, and I'll show you a loser.
Putting that aside, The question asked if people approved or disapproved of them, and my saying "more popular" is a difference without a distinction that you are using to avoid the topic.