- Joined
- Dec 3, 2013
- Messages
- 57,470
- Reaction score
- 14,587
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
Their dress code is unreasonably and unduly restrictive. That's the point. They are allowed, within reasonable limits, to determine a dress code. They do not have an unlimited right to do that.
no it wasn't. it was perfectly fine. not having someone wear head gear is a reasonable limit for a dress code.
they have the right to define what their employee's wear.
just like she can't wear a burka and expect to get a job. he conflicts with the brand and look of what the company is trying to produce.
this was a 100% wrong decision the part of the court.
not wearing headgear is a perfectly reasonable standard of dress.
next I guess I guess they will have to supply her with a prayer mat and a foot washing station since those are to you reasonable requests as well.
in which they are not. nor is it reasonable for her to take 5 breaks in a day.