• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Dem hopeful (Bernie) Sanders once penned essay on women’s rape fantasy

it would not be free
Bernie would make the billionaires and multinational corporations that have done so well over the past 40 years pony up to cover the added benefits for the lower/middle classes


a dog that smart should be writing your posts; be assured, he is much needed
I cannot believe you think that is what would actually happen.
 
Yes. And that is one of the many reasons that rape fantasies have caused so much discussion amongst those of us who look at gender issues.

Since I'm not clear what gender issues are, can you provide some additional insight into this club where you hold such discussions?
 
Since I'm not clear what gender issues are, can you provide some additional insight into this club where you hold such discussions?

Club? It's precisely what is sounds like. It's people who take interest in issues relating to gender: anything from LGBT to feminism to marriage. Sex and Sexuality is where a lot of people discuss such things right here on DP.

It's no different than people who take a particular interest in economics or whatever else. I don't understand what you're asking.
 
it would not be free
Bernie would make the billionaires and multinational corporations that have done so well over the past 40 years pony up to cover the added benefits for the lower/middle classes

So under a President Sanders, people who earned their money will be forced to give their money to the government, who will in turn give it to welfare whores so they can continue to be welfare whores?

Yep...sounds like a Dumbocrat plan to me.
 
Attack the rich and increase benefits and entitlements, you say that's the way to prosperity. You liberals will never get it.

Of course Libturds will never get it. They always think that continuing to throw money at the Poverty Problem will solve it. And that is why the biggest domestic policy disaster before BoondoggleCare was LBJ's War on Poverty.
 
To those of you who think this fantasy this is "No Big Deal", allow me to remind all of you of a blast from the past:

Jack Ryan....Republican Senatorial Candidate vs Community Organizer and Democrat darling Barack Obama.
For some reason, some judge ordered Ryan's divorce records between him and his (very sexy) wife Jeri to be publicly disclosed. In those files, Jeri claimed Jack wanted to indulge in some...interesting sexual fantasies with her. As a result of the disclosure, he was forced out of the race.


Now...my point is this: If Ryan's fantasies were considered fair game, then so is Sanders' fantasies. So, to the liberals of this site, i say this: Don't get your knickers in too much of a wad over any spitballs at Sanders over this.
 
Last edited:
we can only hope

there is no republican who could defeat him

that cannot be said about hillary

An elderly socialist is just as easy as the matriarch of the Clinton crime family.
 
I cannot believe you think that is what would actually happen.

damn. you have some mighty powers to know what i think better than i do

my surmise is that you simply [<- specifically chosen word] do not have anything with which to rebut my assertion
 
So under a President Sanders, people who earned their money will be forced to give their money to the government, who will in turn give it to welfare whores so they can continue to be welfare whores?

Yep...sounds like a Dumbocrat plan to me.

Just like the welfare whores at the defense contractors club that are the beneficiaries of the money that the federal government pilfers from me against my wishes.
 
To those of you who think this fantasy this is "No Big Deal", allow me to remind all of you of a blast from the past:

Jack Ryan....Republican Senatorial Candidate vs Community Organizer and Democrat darling Barack Obama.
For some reason, some judge ordered Ryan's divorce records between him and his (very sexy) wife Jeri to be publicly disclosed. In those files, Jeri claimed Jack wanted to indulge in some...interesting sexual fantasies with her. As a result of the disclosure, he was forced out of the race.


Now...my point is this: If Ryan's fantasies were considered fair game, then so is Sanders' fantasies. So, to the liberals of this site, i say this: Don't get your knickers in too much of a wad over any spitballs at Sanders over this.
I'm curious though...

Where in that article does Sanders talk about his personal fantasies?
 
So under a President Sanders, people who earned their money will be forced to give their money to the government, who will in turn give it to welfare whores so they can continue to be welfare whores?

Yep...sounds like a Dumbocrat plan to me.

Are you talking about the sugar industry, energy, Wall Street or Big Pharma?
 
You guys must seriously be desperate to pin something on Bernie.
 
Are you talking about the sugar industry, energy, Wall Street or Big Pharma?
Regardless, it seem Mr. Sanders had a lot of things right, even back in '72!

"When Sanders first ran for office the year "Man — and Woman" was published, he was anti-war, a proponent of guaranteeing a livable minimum wage, cracking down on big corporations and legalizing drugs."

I'd vote for him.
 
You guys must seriously be desperate to pin something on Bernie.

would not surprise me to learn that it was the clinton camp that dredged up that old tidbit in an effort to undermine Bernie

seems that it would be in the GOP's interest to let him be her political foil. why hurt that?
 
Regardless, it seem Mr. Sanders had a lot of things right, even back in '72!

"When Sanders first ran for office the year "Man — and Woman" was published, he was anti-war, a proponent of guaranteeing a livable minimum wage, cracking down on big corporations and legalizing drugs."

I'd vote for him.

If he is able to beat the big money, pass the crown, powers that be, backed Hillary machine and win the nomination I'll have no problem voting for Bernie. Just for the record, I think Sanders has a shot.
 
would not surprise me to learn that it was the clinton camp that dredged up that old tidbit in an effort to undermine Bernie

seems that it would be in the GOP's interest to let him be her political foil. why hurt that?


Excellent point!
 
damn. you have some mighty powers to know what i think better than i do

my surmise is that you simply [<- specifically chosen word] do not have anything with which to rebut my assertion

I have history to rebut Sanders retarded "Make the RICH" pay and give everyone what they need socialist idiocy.

The level of economic and historical ignorance of people thinking Sanders is on to something astounds me, seriously. Look at any country socialism is tried, seriously tried, from Venezuela on down, the belief government can dictate equality of outcome in life is not just foolhardy it is down right dangerous. The job of Government is to ensure you have the same chance as the next person to work hard and excel at life, not be held down and punished for success. The hells people, look at history, and don't tell me "This time we'll do it right!" cause that next time is ALWAYS the next time.
 
would not surprise me to learn that it was the clinton camp that dredged up that old tidbit in an effort to undermine Bernie

seems that it would be in the GOP's interest to let him be her political foil. why hurt that?

Told my wife that last night dude, I'd put a little money on it!
 
I have history to rebut Sanders retarded "Make the RICH" pay and give everyone what they need socialist idiocy.

The level of economic and historical ignorance of people thinking Sanders is on to something astounds me, seriously. Look at any country socialism is tried, seriously tried, from Venezuela on down, the belief government can dictate equality of outcome in life is not just foolhardy it is down right dangerous. The job of Government is to ensure you have the same chance as the next person to work hard and excel at life, not be held down and punished for success. The hells people, look at history, and don't tell me "This time we'll do it right!" cause that next time is ALWAYS the next time.

Easy now, Sanders, love him or hate him, he's the closest thing in Washington to an honest politician.
 
Well if this disqualifies Bernie I'm not going to run for any political office, someone would only need to find stuff I've posted on DP and a few other forums for all the juicy out of context soundbites they need
 
Dem hopeful Sanders once penned essay on women



I present yet another of America's far left icons, for your entertainment.
Sanders once wrote an article musing about sexual fantasies and relationships.

Assuming the article you talk about is the one you linked.

At no point in that article does he in any way indicate any of the mentioned fantasies are his personal ones.


What the **** kind of insane grasping at straws is going on here? Nothing of note here, nothing at all.
 
Club? It's precisely what is sounds like. It's people who take interest in issues relating to gender: anything from LGBT to feminism to marriage. Sex and Sexuality is where a lot of people discuss such things right here on DP.

It's no different than people who take a particular interest in economics or whatever else. I don't understand what you're asking.

I suppose it could also include issues such as menstruation or jock itch and having nothing to do with sex and sexuality.
 
I have history to rebut Sanders retarded "Make the RICH" pay and give everyone what they need socialist idiocy.
good. please share your cites which offer this history

The level of economic and historical ignorance of people thinking Sanders is on to something astounds me, seriously.
from your posts, you are easily astounded. even by facts

Look at any country socialism is tried, seriously tried,
then let's look at the quality-of-life index and see which nations provide superior living conditions for their citizens: Quality of Life Index by Country 2015

notice that those which are driven by social democracy, the brand of politics Bernie espouses, tend to have high livability indices
that alone shoots your argument to hell

from Venezuela on down,
share with us again the practices of venezuela that Bernie wants to impose in the USA. first, do that, and THEN we can make a comparison using venezuela to illustrate what should not happen
or look at germany, where its people receive advanced training at no personal expense. ditto for advanced medical care. you know, the kinds of changes Bernie is proposing

... the belief government can dictate equality of outcome in life is not just foolhardy it is down right dangerous.
you have taken the individual out of the equation
Bernie advocates helping the individual succeed. there is no magic available to government to assure outcomes. however, the government can harness the assets of a nation to provide opportunities for all. what is unfortunate for the USA is that while profitability is increasing, the vast majority of it is going into very few pockets. that needs to change

The job of Government is to ensure you have the same chance as the next person to work hard and excel at life,
finally, a point with which we both agree

... not be held down and punished for success.
i know of no one who has been punished for being successful
my speculation is you cannot identify anyone either

The hells people, look at history, and don't tell me "This time we'll do it right!" cause that next time is ALWAYS the next time.
we actually get many things right. which is why we are the greatest nation on the planet. but that does not mean we are without significant issues which can, and should, be improved. providing better education for our people, better health care for our citizens, and opportunities for economic success for those who strive to succeed are not unreasonable approaches to public policy. i look forward to your telling us what is wrong with those ideas
 
Back
Top Bottom