Not good examples.
Injured veterans were injured doing work for the government. There was work being inputted into the system and a reward was generated. That right there would be more akin to workers compensation as compared to straight up welfare.
"Emotionally and physically handicapped"
Emotionally handicapped? Eeehhhhhh. Physically handicapped? Depends on what they were doing before.
"Handouts to orphaned children are moronic?"
Can children work? No. Therefore, if their parents cannot take care of them and they go to an orphanage then said orphanages can be subsidized. However, once those kids reach working age, any and all handouts (including living in the orphanage) should end immediately.
-----MOS 19D = cavalry scout = best damn MOS there is
-----MOS 19D = cavalry scout = best damn MOS there is
Give a man a fish and he can eat for a day. Teach a man to fish and he can sit in a boat, drinking beer all day while you fool around with his Woman.
Really? Where does the constitution say the supreme court is the ultimate interpreter of the constitution.? In fact where does it say anything about who has authority to interpret the constitution.?
Fact is the issue is never mentioned, which means, by the tenth amendment, that the states have the authority.
Sorry man, I was not talking about you, but using you as a prop to rail against the fallacies of libertarianism.
Many in the libertarian movement are against government schools. I realize there are no ideological purists (thank god). Hopefully, all of us, be it progressive, conservative, libertarian, socialist.... whatever, are at the end of the day pragmatists and can recognize the extremes of any political ideology are bad.