- Joined
- Feb 19, 2012
- Messages
- 31,057
- Reaction score
- 3,969
- Location
- not here
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Centrist
The German word for Air Force is fascist?
Cool, the more I know I guess.
Uh, why DO you use the German word for Air Force?
The German word for Air Force is fascist?
Cool, the more I know I guess.
Uh, why DO you use the German word for Air Force?
Actually, no it is not.....but then I really wasn't expecting you to negate my position without...That's bull**** and you know it.
....putting words in my mouth while going down a rabbit hole.Are you saying that before the depression America was just a huge ball of fascism in the north and south?
It sounds cool.
Actually, no it is not.....but then I really wasn't expecting you to negate my position without...
....putting words in my mouth while going down a rabbit hole.
Social safety nets should be limited. A reliance on social safety nets (what we have today) is harmful.
It does actually. Thanks for the answer; now I know.
There are cases where it is needed and well justified
I think the only real concession I could make is social security. However, social security would need massive reforming.
The only good thing about social safety nets is that they encourage people to spend. However, they can and definitely do in many, if not most cases, breed laziness.
I think the only real concession I could make is social security. However, social security would need massive reforming.
The only good thing about social safety nets is that they encourage people to spend. However, they can and definitely do in many, if not most cases, breed laziness.
If they'd toss out all the illegal aliens collecting benefits there'd be money for poor CITIZENS.
How do you feel about receiving disability? SSI. Ya think that should be tossed out too?
It does not surprise me in the least that you have no clue as to how the NAZI ideology viewed welfare (the view, in a nutshell, was that the lower classes should be exposed to the most extreme forms of social Darwinism, often with state sponsored culling of that herd).False. Advocating for the destruction of welfare cannot be inherently fascist since fascism is built upon huge government control and weakening welfare is built upon slashing government control.
Ah, the "soup kitchens cause depressions" argument. How quaint.I think the only real concession I could make is social security. However, social security would need massive reforming.
The only good thing about social safety nets is that they encourage people to spend. However, they can and definitely do in many, if not most cases, breed laziness.
But I am sure you have some ideas....Disability depends.
The only true grey area is what happens to people who are born with a disability. For that I have no answer.
I don't care, the company would have to fight back. Either way, taxpayers from around the country don't pay for it.
It does not surprise me in the least that you have no clue as to how the NAZI ideology viewed welfare (the view, in a nutshell, was that the lower classes should be exposed to the most extreme forms of social Darwinism, often with state sponsored culling of that herd).
Further, your "weakening govt control" is false presentation, it is actually just an argument for less govt spending.
It does not surprise me in the least that you have no clue as to how the NAZI ideology viewed welfare (the view, in a nutshell, was that the lower classes should be exposed to the most extreme forms of social Darwinism, often with state sponsored culling of that herd).
Further, your "weakening govt control" is false presentation, it is actually just an argument for less govt spending.
Who do you think pays for the court system?
The court system presides over things. The court system does not give people welfare checks.
Not my problem. Nor should it be the taxpayer's problem.
No, the NAZI's did not like supporting the the physically or economically disadvantaged AT ALL. You are once again trying to use weasel worded argument.The nazis liked welfare and special treatment for certain classes.
But we are not talking about favoring, we are discussing supporting any and all of the disadvantaged in a society, again, it is not a right wing position to support broad based social welfare, nor was it a NAZI position.It would be interesting to see how Hitler felt about starving, "aryan" Germans and whether or not he would want to give them any sort of welfare
If slashing welfare truly was fascist, he would leave these Aryans be. I doubt he would
the problem is, you wrote this:
No, the NAZI's did not like supporting the the physically or economically disadvantaged AT ALL. You are once again trying to use weasel worded argument.
But we are not talking about favoring, we are discussing supporting any and all of the disadvantaged in a society, again, it is not a right wing position to support broad based social welfare, nor was it a NAZI position.
I don't have an issue of taxpayer money going to courts for whatever the reason. I do have an issue with taxpayer money going directly to people who have done nothing to deserve it.
Try reading.
Again, no deeper understanding is shown. It was a racist organization designed to support NAZI supporters of the lower classes, it was not a generalized social welfare program for all German citizens. You can keep playing this game of ignoring the broader NAZI views of removing undesired populations from German society while referencing racist NAZI programs, that is fine with me.National Socialist People's Welfare - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Lolz. Whatever. Cutting welfare is inherently fascist. PFFFTT.