Uh...no. The three contenders will be Bush, Cruz and Walker (with the caveat that Christie might run and be the 4th). They have name recognition. They have outspoken views. They do a good job of delivering their message. They are all capable of winning the Presidency. Where as the Democrat party is running a failed Secretary of State and a socialist.
I'm always amazed how people that live on the extremes live in a bubble, unaware of what's around them.
1. Walker doesn't have name recognition to most in the country.
2. Cruz has zero chance of winning the election. He knows it, but is hoping otherwise. He's practicing for the next time he'll run and hopefully win.
3. Christie used to have a chance, but not any more. He has only himself to blame.
4. Bush was the front contender, but he's made some errors out of the gate. And things have resurfaced to remind us of serious issues he has from his past actions. Terry Schiavo, for instance.
5. Rubio is the only one besides Bush who can help with the latino vote.
6. If the world were betting on a winner, Clinton still has the odds of winning, despite the entire Republican Party gunning for her. They did this when she was First Lady, too, so she's been there before. She is no more a failed Sec of State than any other Sec of State, when looking at her record objectively. Your feelings are interfering with your ability to see things as they are. And I thought it was women who were supposed to be emotional.
But it's early. As an independent looking to vote Republican, if I can find someone, I don't see anyone I'd vote for.....yet. It was Bush, until I was reminded of his past actions, and read some of his current statements on Iraq.
Too bad Paul Ryan's not running. That's a mystery. He's the only one I can think of who would rise to the top immediately.
But it's early. We'll see. It looks like Walker is the sweetheart of the Republican Party, at this time. Which is good news for the Democrats.