Please show me where I said this. After WWII the allies very much were occupying those nations.even you realize that the US does not occupy and control japan, italy, and germany, which proves your justification for occupation to be a wrong one
way to strawman what I said. I never said anything of the sort.actually, that would be you
you are the one who expresses opposition to the occupied people resisting the occupiers
this is an equivalence fallacy. the two are not the same. Israel has had control of the west bank for a while. they won it fair and square in a botched war.have you no sense of history. the Palestinians object to their present occupiers just as the American patriots objected to the british occupation
do you resent that your forefathers took up resistance to oust the british occupiers from the Americans' own lands
they won actually more land than that in that war, however they have given much of the land back in so called land for peace deals that were none existent until
they said enough was enough.
they lost that property in a failed war. as for the other if they stop the unprovoked attacks on Israel then Israel will leave them alone.do you not view an unwelcome armed party occupying your property as being a provocation
pretty simple, and something Israel has stated time and time again.
they refuse to allow this to happen so Israel will maintain a military presence in order to stop unwanted attacks on it's populace.
the Palestinians have already recognized israel
and they recognize the same israeli borders as does the UN - the party which recognized israel to exist
israel would subject its people to less harm if it would abandon the lands of another people
only to someone that has to distort what people say.no, your position continues to be devoid of logic