Page 3 of 11 FirstFirst 12345 ... LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 109

Thread: Obama’s quiet nuclear deal with China raises proliferation concerns

  1. #21
    Sage
    Montecresto's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Last Seen
    03-13-16 @ 10:59 PM
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    24,561

    Re: Obama’s quiet nuclear deal with China raises proliferation concerns

    Quote Originally Posted by polgara View Post
    Good morning, Montecresto.

    Our media is responsible for fomenting this, and I wonder why! This is :
    Hi there Polgara! Well in part, we have allowed our media to become investors in the defence contractors industry!
    Killing one person is murder, killing 100,000 is foreign policy

  2. #22
    Sage
    Montecresto's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Last Seen
    03-13-16 @ 10:59 PM
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    24,561

    Re: Obama’s quiet nuclear deal with China raises proliferation concerns

    Quote Originally Posted by MMC View Post
    That's not what you were asked Monte. But it was a nice sidestep. Just sayin.
    No side step, you accused China of making adversarial issues with the US. What would that be?
    Killing one person is murder, killing 100,000 is foreign policy

  3. #23
    Banned
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Chicago Illinois
    Last Seen
    10-14-15 @ 08:28 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Private
    Posts
    56,981

    Re: Obama’s quiet nuclear deal with China raises proliferation concerns

    Quote Originally Posted by Montecresto View Post
    No side step, you accused China of making adversarial issues with the US. What would that be?
    Try again Monte.....now just where did I accuse China of anything. You were asked what do you do when they make an issue into something adversarial. Since you must be under the impression they live in paradise and don't create issues of adversity.



    [QUOTE=MMC;1064612153]Mornin Monte. What do you do when China makes an issue adversarial.....snip~

  4. #24
    Sage
    Montecresto's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Last Seen
    03-13-16 @ 10:59 PM
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    24,561

    Re: Obama’s quiet nuclear deal with China raises proliferation concerns

    Quote Originally Posted by polgara View Post
    Good morning, Montecresto.

    Our media is responsible for fomenting this, and I wonder why! This is :
    NBC’s owner General Electric designed, manufactured or supplied parts or maintenance for nearly every major weapon system used by the U.S. during the Gulf War—including the Patriot and Tomahawk Cruise missiles, the Stealth bomber, the B-52 bomber, the AWACS plane, and the NAVSTAR spy satellite system. “In other words,” we wrote in Unreliable Sources, “when correspondents and paid consultants on NBC television praised the performance of U.S. weapons, they were extolling equipment made by GE, the corporation that pays their salaries.”

    The Military-Industrial-Media Complex
    Killing one person is murder, killing 100,000 is foreign policy

  5. #25
    Sage

    polgara's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    NE Ohio
    Last Seen
    Today @ 03:42 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Other
    Posts
    17,852

    Re: Obama’s quiet nuclear deal with China raises proliferation concerns

    Quote Originally Posted by Montecresto View Post
    Hi there Polgara! Well in part, we have allowed our media to become investors in the defence contractors industry!
    Unbelievable! Do we really want WW3? Tensions are running too high for my liking, and it's deliberately being done! Who are the crazies behind this?

  6. #26
    Educator
    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Last Seen
    @
    Gender
    Lean
    Conservative
    Posts
    1,198

    Re: Obama’s quiet nuclear deal with China raises proliferation concerns

    Quote Originally Posted by polgara View Post
    Unbelievable! Do we really want WW3? Tensions are running too high for my liking, and it's deliberately being done! Who are the crazies behind this?
    What "tensions" are you talking about? Sounds to me the main tensions are in your head.

  7. #27
    Sage
    Montecresto's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Last Seen
    03-13-16 @ 10:59 PM
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    24,561

    Re: Obama’s quiet nuclear deal with China raises proliferation concerns

    [QUOTE=MMC;1064612244]Try again Monte.....now just where did I accuse China of anything. You were asked what do you do when they make an issue into something adversarial. Since you must be under the impression they live in paradise and don't create issues of adversity.



    Quote Originally Posted by MMC View Post
    Mornin Monte. What do you do when China makes an issue adversarial.....snip~
    Yes, and I asked you, what would that be?
    Killing one person is murder, killing 100,000 is foreign policy

  8. #28
    Sage
    Montecresto's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Last Seen
    03-13-16 @ 10:59 PM
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    24,561

    Re: Obama’s quiet nuclear deal with China raises proliferation concerns

    Quote Originally Posted by polgara View Post
    Unbelievable! Do we really want WW3? Tensions are running too high for my liking, and it's deliberately being done! Who are the crazies behind this?
    Who's Paying the Pro-War Pundits?
    Lee Fang on September 16, 2014 - 5:37PM ET
    Who
    Killing one person is murder, killing 100,000 is foreign policy

  9. #29
    Sage
    Montecresto's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Last Seen
    03-13-16 @ 10:59 PM
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    24,561

    Re: Obama’s quiet nuclear deal with China raises proliferation concerns

    Quote Originally Posted by LeoVlaming View Post
    What "tensions" are you talking about? Sounds to me the main tensions are in your head.
    Oh dear
    Killing one person is murder, killing 100,000 is foreign policy

  10. #30
    Sage
    Montecresto's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Last Seen
    03-13-16 @ 10:59 PM
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    24,561

    Re: Obama’s quiet nuclear deal with China raises proliferation concerns

    Quote Originally Posted by polgara View Post
    Unbelievable! Do we really want WW3? Tensions are running too high for my liking, and it's deliberately being done! Who are the crazies behind this?
    That's not all Polgara.

    The nonpartisan Center for Responsive Politics has calculated that more than 151 members of Congress have up to $195 million invested in major defense contractors that are earning profits from the US military occupations in Iraq and Afghanistan.

    14. Congress Invested in Defense Contracts – Top 25 of 2010
    Killing one person is murder, killing 100,000 is foreign policy

Page 3 of 11 FirstFirst 12345 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •