Show me the spending in the Reagan stimulus? This has to be a game, you ought to know betterimagep;1064626384]Reagan ran up three times more debt than every president before him COMBINED. So yea, if deficit spending is stimulative, then Obama has done a piss poor job compared to Reagan.
How many times do I have to post the numbers. You don't pay any attention to them. Where was Obama in 2006-2008?Why should it? How many "unemployed/under employed/discouraged plus marginally attached" were their when Obama took office? Again, just raw numbers don't mean anything, unless we have something to compare them to. If someone told me that there were 17 thousand of those people, that might would sound like a lot, unless I knew that it's typically tens of millions.
so let's ignore the unemployed, under employed, discouraged to focus on 500,000 increase in food stamps most of which are handled by the state and local governments.Try this one, under Obama, the foodstamp roll grew by 14.2 million people. Sounds outragous, almost unbelievable, until we find out that it grew by 14.7 under Bush.