- Joined
- May 14, 2009
- Messages
- 24,583
- Reaction score
- 8,632
- Location
- Israel
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Centrist
Re: Shooting at Muhammad Art Exhibit in Texas
You've been asked four times to provide evidence to your claims. You've strongly refused putting a reference to show that the mockery of religion is an unprotected speech or how the American legal system limits freedom of speech when it comes to the mockery of religion. You're embarrassing really and that's all I've been pointing out here.
Regarding the actual topic the mockery of religion has never been unprotected speech and probably never will in America. What is referred to as unprotected speech is incitement to violence, incitement to racism, copyrights issues, libel, threats of violence, fighting words etc etc etc. If there's something you've learned today it is that you should study the law before you try and use it in defense of your repulsive agenda - an agenda that strongly opposes one of Democracy's key values; the freedom of speech.
By the way, DP is a private website and is not required by law to grant you the freedom of speech when you're posting on its boards, so that's yet more stupid.
That's like saying that DP opposes free speech because they won't allow me to call you what you are. :roll: Due to your intellectual laziness, you won't read through these 160 pages to see what my position is. Instead you inject a strawman, and then demand once, twice, three times that I respond to it. That's failed debate young man. While Geller's right to her ignorant and irresponsible hate that she hides behind her constitutional liberties has been acknowledged by me, I have consistently pointed out its failure and imprudence. I've also pointed out that American courts have placed limitations on speech, and that it could be argued that Geller's speech does fall under those limitations, but pointed out that until such argument is made in court, it will just remain stupid, gratuitously provocative and irresponsible speech. All of which you would know if you weren't so damn lazy, and intellectually dishonest.
You've been asked four times to provide evidence to your claims. You've strongly refused putting a reference to show that the mockery of religion is an unprotected speech or how the American legal system limits freedom of speech when it comes to the mockery of religion. You're embarrassing really and that's all I've been pointing out here.
Regarding the actual topic the mockery of religion has never been unprotected speech and probably never will in America. What is referred to as unprotected speech is incitement to violence, incitement to racism, copyrights issues, libel, threats of violence, fighting words etc etc etc. If there's something you've learned today it is that you should study the law before you try and use it in defense of your repulsive agenda - an agenda that strongly opposes one of Democracy's key values; the freedom of speech.
By the way, DP is a private website and is not required by law to grant you the freedom of speech when you're posting on its boards, so that's yet more stupid.
Last edited: