• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Two Shot at Muhammad Art Exhibit [W:439, 529, 978, 1489]

Re: Shooting at Muhammad Art Exhibit in Texas

Its her right, she need not justify it you, leftist.

Yes, everybody has acknowledged her right to be a stupid bitch and provoke violence. Don't you hope she runs right out and does this again, hmm. Don't you hope that she exercises her freedom of speech like this weekly?
 
Re: Shooting at Muhammad Art Exhibit in Texas

Everyone knows that Muslim extremists are like snakes, scorpions or black widows, they don't necessarily need provocation to strike. But fools poke at them anyway. Let this dumb bitch keep poking her stick, yelling her constitutional liberty, and perhaps she finds that worth her life. But in the process, she may get somebody I care about killed. Total irresponsibility, supported at DP largely by the right, :roll: few are surprised though.

Frankly, if you support free speech you should be defending her the loudest, as its unpopular speech to the left.

Our President allowed a group of terrorists to attack Americans, thats where your anger should be pointed.
 
Re: Shooting at Muhammad Art Exhibit in Texas

Indeed it does, which is why one reason so many leftist loathe freedom and why the terrorists and those who think like them can not be trusted.

The dumb bitch in Garland was exercising her freedom irresponsibly and a man has been injured because of it, thankfully it wasn't any worse. Those of you hoping for a Charlie Hibdo redux in America will have to continue to encourage Geller.
 
Re: Two Shot at Muhammad Art Exhibit in Texas

Haha, nailed you with that. Actually, it could be dumb men or women. I suspect there were some mouth breather men at her event colouring cartoon pics as well. I'll also bet that none of the people that attended her event in Garland will ever do so again. ;) speaking against men, rape!?!? What are you blathering about there?

Hate to break it to you but Geller and many of her defenders are not only going to keep at it, they will probably expand after this.

She has spent her career pointing out the dangers of radical islam, getting attacked gives her more credibility. :2wave:

Think of it like the pizza shop in indiana. :cool:
 
Re: Shooting at Muhammad Art Exhibit in Texas

Frankly, if you support free speech you should be defending her the loudest, as its unpopular speech to the left.

Our President allowed a group of terrorists to attack Americans, thats where your anger should be pointed.

I don't support irresponsible speech. A person may yell fire in the crowded theatre when there is in fact no fire, and somebody may get injured as the crowd scurries to exit. That, as Geller's is irresponsible. Can you tell me what Geller gained by her expression that is worth the security guard being injured. Or perhaps you think that that was her gain.
 
Re: Shooting at Muhammad Art Exhibit in Texas

The only hate and bigotry I see is coming from Muslims. They kill innocent people without any provocation whatsoever. Do you really need a list to demonstrate that Pam Geller has not their only target?

Those school girls in Afghanistan deserved getting acid thrown in their faces, serves them right for getting all uppity and wanting to read.
 
Re: Two Shot at Muhammad Art Exhibit in Texas

Hate to break it to you but Geller and many of her defenders are not only going to keep at it, they will probably expand after this.

She has spent her career pointing out the dangers of radical islam, getting attacked gives her more credibility. :2wave:

Think of it like the pizza shop in indiana. :cool:

You're not breaking anything to me. I already fully expect to see Geller and her psyco supporters keeping at it until we have a Charlie Hebdo redux here, or worse.
 
Re: Two Shot at Muhammad Art Exhibit in Texas

Is it your understanding that Muslims havent killed people in the USA already, and have made several attempts to kill more? They will kill in order to terrify Americans and restrict any criticism of Islam. You, among many others, are one of their Dhimmis.

The terrorists know there are a significant number of people in the US who can and will be intimidated. We know them as the people that wanted to cut and run in Iraq, the people that think the US is always to blame, the people that still think terror isn't a problem (somehow).

I can even think of a political ideology that aligns with those views.
 
Re: Shooting at Muhammad Art Exhibit in Texas

Yes, everybody has acknowledged her right to be a stupid bitch and provoke violence. Don't you hope she runs right out and does this again, hmm. Don't you hope that she exercises her freedom of speech like this weekly?

I hope she does indeed continue, I don't like seeing Americans silenced by terror, apparently you dont hold the same view.
 
Re: Shooting at Muhammad Art Exhibit in Texas

The dumb bitch in Garland was exercising her freedom irresponsibly and a man has been injured because of it, thankfully it wasn't any worse. Those of you hoping for a Charlie Hibdo redux in America will have to continue to encourage Geller.

No, lefty. See this is one example of your absolutely flawed logic.

Yes-a man was injured in Garland-but it wasn't because of her exercising her freedom.

Rather it was because of taliban tony trying to TAKE her freedom.

Get it right, try as hard as you can.
 
Re: Shooting at Muhammad Art Exhibit in Texas

I don't support irresponsible speech. A person may yell fire in the crowded theatre when there is in fact no fire, and somebody may get injured as the crowd scurries to exit. That, as Geller's is irresponsible. Can you tell me what Geller gained by her expression that is worth the security guard being injured. Or perhaps you think that that was her gain.

Her speech isn't irresponsible (love how statists believe they are the arbiters of speech) the jihadi's were irresponsible.
 
Re: Shooting at Muhammad Art Exhibit in Texas

Her speech isn't irresponsible (love how statists believe they are the arbiters of speech) the jihadi's were irresponsible.

The two men who showed up to kill were beyond irresponsible. :roll:
 
Re: Shooting at Muhammad Art Exhibit in Texas

No, lefty. See this is one example of your absolutely flawed logic.

Yes-a man was injured in Garland-but it wasn't because of her exercising her freedom.

Rather it was because of taliban tony trying to TAKE her freedom.

Get it right, try as hard as you can.

Act irresponsible, suffer the consequences.
 
Re: Two Shot at Muhammad Art Exhibit in Texas

You're not breaking anything to me. I already fully expect to see Geller and her psyco supporters keeping at it until we have a Charlie Hebdo redux here, or worse.

Window into the mind of the leftist.

First off I thought terrorism was over hyped and nothing to worry about-just a scheme to get republican votes?

So we have two sides, one using its freedoms as have always existed, and another seeking to silence those views with terrible violence.

And your conclusion to this problem-is that the side speaking its views is the problem.

I have to say, thank you for showing your true colors.
 
Re: Shooting at Muhammad Art Exhibit in Texas

I hope she does indeed continue, I don't like seeing Americans silenced by terror, apparently you dont hold the same view.

I hold none of your views. Your not even American to me. Your provocative, hateful and bigoted views, along with your lust for war and violence is sickening.
 
Re: Two Shot at Muhammad Art Exhibit in Texas

Window into the mind of the leftist.

First off I thought terrorism was over hyped and nothing to worry about-just a scheme to get republican votes?

So we have two sides, one using its freedoms as have always existed, and another seeking to silence those views with terrible violence.

And your conclusion to this problem-is that the side speaking its views is the problem.

I have to say, thank you for showing your true colors.

Yes, it's called reap what you sew. Geller's bigoted expression (her right) has caused the injury of one. I'm under no illusion that she's learned a lesson, and in the future will exercise her liberty responsibly. I fully expect her and her psychotic supporters to continue until there's a Charlie Hebdo incident in America.
 
Re: Shooting at Muhammad Art Exhibit in Texas

I hold none of your views. Your not even American to me. Your provocative, hateful and bigoted views, along with your lust for war and violence is sickening.

Thats nice but the problem is that though we dont have to agree, the constitution protects us both. You are now blaming those protections for the actions of terrorists.

Nice try, but you are going to have to pound sand.
 
Re: Shooting at Muhammad Art Exhibit in Texas

Yes, everybody has acknowledged her right to be a stupid bitch and provoke violence. Don't you hope she runs right out and does this again, hmm. Don't you hope that she exercises her freedom of speech like this weekly?

Rightie statists refuse to acknowledge the obvious, even to them.

Cause-and-effect will never be recognized by Rightists, even with a mass murder, and we were close to that as the Garland Mayor attests.

Rightists already have their TPs lined up for such a mass murder--blaming lefties--as per the National Review and Daily Caller .
 
Re: Shooting at Muhammad Art Exhibit in Texas

I don't support irresponsible speech. A person may yell fire in the crowded theatre when there is in fact no fire, and somebody may get injured as the crowd scurries to exit. That, as Geller's is irresponsible. Can you tell me what Geller gained by her expression that is worth the security guard being injured. Or perhaps you think that that was her gain.

Apparently you imagine that Justice Holmes' famous "crowded theater" example from Schenck applies to Ms. Geller's contest. How, exactly? Please tell us why, under the "clear and present danger" standard from Brandenburg v. Ohio, the speech she engaged in is not protected by the First Amendment.

Ms. Geller's freedom of speech does not depend on whether you think what was said is "irresponsible," or on whether you think it gained anything. Neither does anyone else's. Or maybe you think the First Amendment should be ignored whenever it allows speech that peeves you. If so, your view is thoroughly illiberal.
 
Re: Two Shot at Muhammad Art Exhibit in Texas

Yes, it's called reap what you sew. Geller's bigoted expression (her right) has caused the injury of one. I'm under no illusion that she's learned a lesson, and in the future will exercise her liberty responsibly. I fully expect her and her psychotic supporters to continue until there's a Charlie Hebdo incident in America.

Last I checked, words and ideas dont cause violence-and AK's and bombs do.

Can you elaborate on how words caused the wound?
 
Re: Shooting at Muhammad Art Exhibit in Texas

Rightie statists refuse to acknowledge the obvious, even to them.

Cause-and-effect will never be recognized by Rightists, even with a mass murder, and we were close to that as the Garland Mayor attests.

Rightists already have their TPs lined up for such a mass murder--blaming lefties--as per the National Review and Daily Caller .

Nimby if freedom scares you, you are free to pursue other avenues.

Looks like you already may have.
 
Re: Two Shot at Muhammad Art Exhibit in Texas

Yes, it's called reap what you sew. Geller's bigoted expression (her right) has caused the injury of one. I'm under no illusion that she's learned a lesson, and in the future will exercise her liberty responsibly. I fully expect her and her psychotic supporters to continue until there's a Charlie Hebdo incident in America.

Geller is a xerox of Coulter.
 
Re: Shooting at Muhammad Art Exhibit in Texas

Apparently you imagine that Justice Holmes' famous "crowded theater" example from Schenck applies to Ms. Geller's contest. How, exactly? Please tell us why, under the "clear and present danger" standard from Brandenburg v. Ohio, the speech she engaged in is not protected by the First Amendment.

Ms. Geller's freedom of speech does not depend on whether you think what was said is "irresponsible," or on whether you think it gained anything. Neither does anyone else's. Or maybe you think the First Amendment should be ignored whenever it allows speech that peeves you. If so, your view is thoroughly illiberal.

Leftists lack a basic understanding of the constitution (except in how to exploit it to further their goals), and so its always amusing to hear them try to spin together explanations, its almost superstitious, really.
 
Re: Two Shot at Muhammad Art Exhibit in Texas

Last I checked, words and ideas dont cause violence-and AK's and bombs do.

Can you elaborate on how words caused the wound?

Can you tell me how that security guard would be laying wounded at present were it not for Geller's little immature and provocative exercise the other day.
 
Back
Top Bottom