No one is "wrong" for exercising their right free speech, nor is it wrong to disagree by using your right to free speech in response. What is wrong is trying to murder other people for exercising their First Amendment rights.
You genuinely don't understand this?
Yeah. That goddamn 1st amendment.
So it's all Gellar's group's fault. :roll:
I don't see anything wrong with holding a free speech event. Perhaps you're confused on that point regarding the event
The only hatred demonstrated was by those who were trying to kill innocent people, just like what happened at Charlie Hebdo. Free speech and free ideas are rights which should be demanded by every person born into this world and none of us should be intimidated by those who would remove them.
England
We have debates here all the time, and it was designed for that, but no one would threaten murder to another for saying something "Provocative", or "Controversial". We understand that debate is where the truth may arrive and a general consensus reached.This is what gets me-Leftists used to claim to be champions of the 1st ammendment but the first jihadi attacks and they suddenly want to capitulate-to do EXACTLY what these medieval throwbacks want-which is shut up and do as they say.Not good enough and leftists and other appeaser should be ashamed of themselves.
Those are perfectly legal and you don't see me out trying to shoot the attendees. Your point failsI assume you also support burning the US flag events and events that have America is Satan themes?
Nothing like this goes on in England? Really?
Those are perfectly legal and you don't see me out trying to shoot the attendees. Your point fails
This is what gets me-Leftists used to claim to be champions of the 1st ammendment but the first jihadi attacks and they suddenly want to capitulate-to do EXACTLY what these medieval throwbacks want-which is shut up and do as they say.
Not good enough and leftists and other appeaser should be ashamed of themselves.
Well, in Peet's defense, he is European. They put Islamic demands above human rights there and blame the Jews for it. :2razz:
The problem with this argument is there is maybe a thousand Christians in the world that want you dead for your beliefs while roughly 10% of Muslims, 120 million people, want you dead. The reason for the disparity is because followers of Christ act against the teachings of Jesus in behaving that way while Muslims are acting more like Mohammed when they kill infidels.
Yeah. That goddamn 1st amendment.
We're dealing with yahoos who believe that the only "acceptable response" is through IEDs or automatic weapons, all in the name of a religion that's stuck in the Dark Ages.
Anyone who does not understand that all politicians are lying morons is a fool - just don't be a fool!
They should take this into consideration: **** with us at your own risk.
Nothing radical there dude....that's called taking it to them. I know, liberals are skeeered to do that. Wishy Washy pukes that they are!No the cause is the combination of the cartoons and the radical freaks who held the event. The cartoons would not be there if it had not been for the event and the even was only there because of this bitch and her followers wanting to provoke the radicals.
YOUR country? Where is that?
I agree. There is no room for that kind of provocation! I demand immediately that the Jon Stewart show , MSNBC , the Huffington Post and Bill Maher and other similar dopey liberal freaks immediateley cease operations because all they are doing is provoking the tea party.
( Hopefully that example will show you how ridiculous you sound)
Suddenly free speech is a radical idea
I've no issue with the content of the post except that 'art' wasn't any part of the equation. Polemics, yes. Controversy, yes. Provocation, yes. Art? Absolutely not.
But that's fine. You don't have to be engaging in fine art to not be a target for intolerant bigotry. In fact, you can be engaging in intolerant bigotry (as were Geller/De Wilde et al) and still not merit murderous attention.
England
This is what gets me-Leftists used to claim to be champions of the 1st amendment but the first jihadi attacks and they suddenly want to capitulate-to do EXACTLY what these medieval throwbacks want-which is shut up and do as they say.
Not good enough and leftists and other appeaser should be ashamed of themselves.
No but she certainly holds some blame in intentionally trying to provoke people just as I would be to blame if I was put a steak on my babies face with a pack of rabid dogs near by and they attacked.
I assume you also support burning the US flag events and events that have America is Satan themes?
Intentionally doing something that you apecifically know will anger others is not hatred?
Yeah, it sure as hell is hatred.
We have debates here all the time, and it was designed for that, but no one would threaten murder to another for saying something "Provocative", or "Controversial". We understand that debate is where the truth may arrive and a general consensus reached.
Were Christians to make murder threats against Leftists threatening their Christmas displays, or deny them being displayed, they would not feel threatened. In fact the Left attacks Christians because they know they will not be threatened.
That's why most of them are equivocating cowards, fearful of offending anyone who might be a genuine threat to their security and well being.
An example. 145 Intellectuals Agree: Dead Cartoonists Aren't Worthy of Free-Speech Award if Their Murderers Come From a Disadvantaged Minority - Hit & Run : Reason.com
Those are perfectly legal and you don't see me out trying to shoot the attendees. Your point fails
No my point does not fail as my point was to have you answer a question. You did. My point was successful. You say they are legal. Good.
Well, in Peet's defense, he is European. They put Islamic demands above human rights there and blame the Jews for it. :2razz:
They must. I remember how fast the Spain capitulated after the attacks there. Its idiocy.
Mmmmmm.................fail!
Who from those groups plans to murder many at one of those events?
No......... it's got nothing to do with hatred. Your thinking is about as screwed up as most other liberals! Every time you bozos elect some Marxist like obama...I get angry.......very angry. So are liberals hateful when they nominate a guy that shouldn't have even qualified to run of the office? Are you guys going out of your way to piss me off? Should I have retaliated?
Yep!
And so is a cartoon event! Not only legal....but a terrific idea
Why is it a terrific idea?
Because it smokes out the radical scum to be shot dead. I'm Lovin it mannnn!
It smokes out the radical to actively seek out and shoot innocent people... and you love it? What is your ****ing problem man... holy ****, go to therapy fast.
I'm perfectly fine with the 1st A, and completely agree that their actions were legal and protected (the event organizers/participators)Yeah. That goddamn 1st amendment.
That may be.We're dealing with yahoos who believe that the only "acceptable response" is through IEDs or automatic weapons, all in the name of a religion that's stuck in the Dark Ages.