To the bolded. Which strikes me as odd. Just as we might support her right to say stupid, even though we don't agree with it, we can disagree and criticise her expression, though we acknowledge the right to say it. What the heck is the difference. Other than focusing on the undisputed right keeps the attention away from the contempt of her expression.
Killing one person is murder, killing 100,000 is foreign policy
Freedom of speech is not freedom from criticism.
That was somewhat the way Democrats treated people they didn't like in the Jim Crow era. Some things never change
Mohammad was a murderer who had sex with a girl when she was 9. If he cannot be mocked, who can?
It's amazing, the mental gymnastics people are capable of performing as long as something is called "religion". Just because a warlord created a manifesto in order to bind his warriors to him, should people living 1400 years later be restricted in their ability to call it what it is?
"you're better off on Stormfront discussing how evil brown men are taking innocent white flowers." Infinite Chaos