Do you know why people are no longer saying the arresting Officers injured him? That is becasue the information has changed.
We have been given the information. The arguments are based on that information.
Your failure to understand that is your problem.
Just like in the following.
At no point in the below quote did he make any declarative statement about what he said.
“And they trying to make it seem like I told them that, I made it like Freddie Gray did that to hisself (sic),” Allen said. “Why the [expletive] would he do that to hisself (sic)?”
Whether he was being deceitful at this point remains to be seen, but the manner in which he said the above is a way of being deceitful without actually lying.
And he already stated the reason he is doing this is because of fear.
“I had two options today right, either come and talk to y’all and get my credibility straight with ya’ll and not get killed by these [expletive] or not tell a true story,” Allen added. “The only reason I’m doing this is because they put my name in a bad state.”
It was confirmed to be contained on an affidavit for a search warrant. That is a conclusion that was provided to us from the mouth of an ear witness.
Not becasue people "hope" it to be true.
What we have is conflicting information.
Either the Police are lying about he said, or he is.
As his statement was taken at the very beginning prior to any uprising there doesn't appear to be any reason for either party to have lied at that point.
Does reason exist now? Yes it does.
So what is going to matter at this point is the substance of his statements that are in the hands of the Prosecutor making the decisions.
Not what that person later tells or insinuates to a reporter, especially if it is for his own safety.
And your comment is ridiculous given that fact that we do have information that can be debated. It is even more ridiculous in light of the fact that this is a debate site, not a site to just say IDK in the face of evidence we have and can debate.
At no point in the above interviews did he say any such thing.
And there is no indication that it was a "rough ride". That has already been dispelled by this witness even, and yet here you are continuing to peddle that bs. That is called dishonesty.
2. You clearly do not know what you are talking about. You have nothing more than an assumption which you choose to believe. That is based on your own bias.