People were using the other guy's statements as support for the ridiculous notion that Gray harmed himself. When that other guy came forward and provided a direct quote himself, countermanding the earlier statement attributed to him, that completely unraveled the notion that an eye witness claimed to have seen Freddie Gray harming himself.
:naughty
No he didn't, so stop being dishonest.
What he said now did not countermand what he said to investigators.
What he said now was purposely worded to be dishonest without lying.
What he said now is also tainted by the very fact of the reason he sated he was saying what he did. Fear for his life.
You can't get around these things.
But that claim is irrefutably wrong.
No, that would be yours, as already shown.
He was picked up on the last stop. A majority of the ride happened before he got in the van.
And the witness heard him moving around. He has not refuted that.
As the Commissioner let us know, the witness said he said he was thrashing about.
All of the reporting of his earlier statements were secondhand, and refuted when the firsthand source was interviewed.
Lame argument.
His prior statements are documented by the investigators and at least one of them was used in an affidavit for a search warrant. That is what was confirmed.
And while reporting is second hand, that means absolutely jack when that is what he said.
Secondly, nothing he said has been refuted.
This has already been pointed out to you.
And as we already know, the believability of what he says now is tainted by his trying to protect himself.
Which you also already know.
Don't feel bad even though it is your fault for continually being wrong.