Page 17 of 17 FirstFirst ... 7151617
Results 161 to 168 of 168

Thread: Russian hackers read Obama's unclassified emails last year: NYT......

  1. #161
    Banned
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Chicago Illinois
    Last Seen
    10-14-15 @ 08:28 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Private
    Posts
    56,981

    Re: Russian hackers read Obama's unclassified emails last year: NYT......

    Quote Originally Posted by Hatuey View Post
    And I explained why you don't know what you're talking about because your understanding of the technology is lower than that of the movie Hackers. That's quite the accomplishment. You're basically ignoring that your eccentric patois is just pseudo-intellectual jargon that doesn't actually address the matter. It's on par with getting wifi on your phone.

    Yeah well going back and reading the thread all the way thru.....you're not doing so well. Although going tangential did help you a little. But only with what you know about computers. The rest.....you need to study a bit more.

    Consider it like you made a page or two as one of supporting actors. Although its not Motion Picture material. Just sayin.

  2. #162
    Sage
    Hatuey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Last Seen
    Today @ 03:47 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Moderate
    Posts
    41,335

    Re: Russian hackers read Obama's unclassified emails last year: NYT......

    Quote Originally Posted by MMC View Post
    Yeah well going back and reading the thread all the way thru
    Yes, it's clear that you made an analysis that is simply baffling to a person with even a slight understanding of the technology you are discussing. Please, if you feel I'm wrong, I welcome you to sign up to any white hat forum and inform yourself on the issue. As it stands, you can't even discuss the basics of the issue. That being, the type of setups we're discussing here. If you can't discuss that, why should your analysis be given any thought? If you did know what you're discussing, you would have already realized what's wrong with your analysis.
    I refuse to accept the view that mankind is so tragically bound to the starless midnight of racism and war that the bright daybreak of peace and brotherhood can never become a reality. - MLK

  3. #163
    Banned
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Chicago Illinois
    Last Seen
    10-14-15 @ 08:28 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Private
    Posts
    56,981

    Re: Russian hackers read Obama's unclassified emails last year: NYT......

    Quote Originally Posted by Hatuey View Post
    Yes, it's clear that you made an analysis that is simply baffling to a person with even a slight understanding of the technology you are discussing. Please, if you feel I'm wrong, I welcome you to sign up to any white hat forum and inform yourself on the issue. As it stands, you can't even discuss the basics of the issue. That being, the type of setups we're discussing here. If you can't discuss that, why should your analysis be given any thought? If you did know what you're discussing, you would have already realized what's wrong with your analysis.

    Nah, if you noticed it wasn't baffling to several others.

    Nor did you trying to trivialize the matter even come close to being reality.....which that was shown for what is. But no one did come out and say you don't know about computers. So you are okay there.

  4. #164
    Sage
    Hatuey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Last Seen
    Today @ 03:47 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Moderate
    Posts
    41,335

    Re: Russian hackers read Obama's unclassified emails last year: NYT......

    Quote Originally Posted by MMC View Post
    Nah, if you noticed it wasn't baffling to several others.
    Relying on others to get your back? Hm, interesting. That seems to be a preferred method of yours when your arguments fail. However, it's irrelevant to the matter because they're only showing that they're as uninformed as yourself. It really is terrifying that you'd come up with such an absurd analysis without knowing the basics of the technology you're discussing. What's next? Hillary's e-mail allowed the next NASA failure to happen?
    I refuse to accept the view that mankind is so tragically bound to the starless midnight of racism and war that the bright daybreak of peace and brotherhood can never become a reality. - MLK

  5. #165
    Banned
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Chicago Illinois
    Last Seen
    10-14-15 @ 08:28 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Private
    Posts
    56,981

    Re: Russian hackers read Obama's unclassified emails last year: NYT......

    Quote Originally Posted by Hatuey View Post
    Relying on others to get your back? Hm, interesting. That seems to be a preferred method of yours when your arguments fail. However, it's irrelevant to the matter because they're only showing that they're as uninformed as yourself. It really is terrifying that you'd come up with such an absurd analysis without knowing the basics of the technology you're discussing. What's next? Hillary's e-mail allowed the next NASA failure to happen?

    Funny how reporters can do the same damn thing. Imagine that!

    Nah the only thing next is.....when they tie in Hillary to being breached and make a lil noise about it.

  6. #166
    Sage
    Hatuey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Last Seen
    Today @ 03:47 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Moderate
    Posts
    41,335

    Re: Russian hackers read Obama's unclassified emails last year: NYT......

    Quote Originally Posted by MMC View Post
    Funny how reporters can do the same damn thing.
    Oh? A reporter said it was possible to hack one server by having 'e-mails and passwords', using keyloggers and social engineering? Do you even know what you're discussing in the least bit? You seem to be the only person here trying to justify your ridiculous analysis. All of the sources you keep posting just show how little you actually know about what is being discussed. Lmao. You're basically saying that State Dept. has ****tier security than Debate Politics.
    I refuse to accept the view that mankind is so tragically bound to the starless midnight of racism and war that the bright daybreak of peace and brotherhood can never become a reality. - MLK

  7. #167
    Banned
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Chicago Illinois
    Last Seen
    10-14-15 @ 08:28 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Private
    Posts
    56,981

    Re: Russian hackers read Obama's unclassified emails last year: NYT......

    Quote Originally Posted by Hatuey View Post
    Oh? A reporter said it was possible to hack one server by having 'e-mails and passwords', using keyloggers and social engineering? Do you even know what you're discussing in the least bit? You seem to be the only person here trying to justify your ridiculous analysis. All of the sources you keep posting just show how little you actually know about what is being discussed. Lmao. You're basically saying that State Dept. has ****tier security than Debate Politics.
    Say what, you come back with more of that simpleton stuff you construct......truly it wont help you. Like I stated.....you didn't know anything except for what you know about puters and some hackers. So save all that BS about going technical over a hacker.

    As it is clear once a hacker can get your personal info. They can do all kinds of damage to somebody. But then you will say that **** is trivial too.

    Just like you tried to play out here.....took BO's own people to help you with the understanding. Then of course my pounding it in to reinforce the point.
    Last edited by MMC; 04-27-15 at 07:46 AM.

  8. #168
    Sage


    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    SW Virginia
    Last Seen
    Today @ 06:44 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Conservative
    Posts
    17,467

    Re: Russian hackers read Obama's unclassified emails last year: NYT......

    Quote Originally Posted by Hatuey View Post
    Sure enough, however social engineering, viruses and keyloggers will never get you into a State Dept's server. Neither will the information that they produce. There simply is no transmittable information contained in any e-mail that would allow somebody to get into a State Dept server because they're not facebook accounts. You don't simply get a password and an account and you're good to go which is what you've been inferring for some time. That's why the entire premise that the WH/State Dept were hacked through some bit of information contained in Hillary's account is laughable if not outright mythical. This isn't a movie.
    I think you underestimate China's abilities in this regard.

Page 17 of 17 FirstFirst ... 7151617

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •