Funny how Homogenation always points towards warming ?
And since when did the Scientific method ever need to be peer reviewed ?
Oh thats right, when ideologues started in with their chiken little propaganda and needed " Scientific evidence " to back their lies, the Scientific method was redefined and or outright ignored.
Last edited by Fenton; 04-27-15 at 02:39 PM.
" If no one among us is capable of governing himself, then who among us has the capacity to govern someone else ? "
Very few are contesting that CO2 is a greenhouse gas, and as such has a direct response sensitivity.
We can even go with the IPCC number of 1.2 °C for a doubling of CO2, but that will not cause the
predicted 3 to 4.5 °C of warming the IPCC is raising the alarm over.
It is clear that the models did not account for all of the feedbacks, both positive and negative.
Konservatives should stick to words like "gun" and "barn" and leave science to the adults.The width of tree rings varies with, among other things, temperature. They can be used to estimate temperature for times before thermometers were in widespread use. When cross sections are taken of trees there is a pattern of annular rings. The width of these rings is, in part, a function of temperature.
hahahhahaaa.... give me a break.. yea.. tree rings.. LOL... water ,wind , shade, soil density , nutrients and sun wouldnt affect that..ONLY temperature.. right?
what we see is that liberals are super gullible.. and nothing but emotion over facts... fact is we dont know...
here is where you flash a picture of a polar bear on an ice cap
Last edited by Travis007; 04-27-15 at 03:05 PM.