Of course, because by your reasoning, if a white man appoints a white man, it's the way the world should work. That's what happened the first 77 times an AG was appointed in American history. If a black man appoints a black man or woman (2 of 83 times), he's pandering to racial agendas.
Not only that, but since the appointee is a black woman, the only possible explanation for her getting the job, this person you know NOTHING about, is AA. You haven't offered even a hint about her record from 1984 to 2015, a 30 year career after Harvard. Literally not.one.thing. Nothing. But you assert without the slightest whiff of evidence that her entire career is nothing but a series of AA achievements.
You do realize how stupid that argument is, don't you?