Yes a centrist. A very big centrist. Just because your views are either so far right, or much of the republican party has moved so far right does not mean Obama is some "far left wing leftist" as many in the Tea Party have made him out to be. I mean for ****s sake he promotes many of the policies of ****ing Reagan...Originally Posted by Chainsaw
Name ONE President who has been left of Obama? And supporting data and examples.
You are obviously just ashamed and embarrassed for having supported and voted for that worthless narcissistic lying empty suit.....TWICE
The Gruber-crat is strong in this one!
I think Chomsky says it best.
“A drug is not bad. A drug is a chemical compound. The problem comes in when people who take drugs treat them like a license to behave like an asshole.” People do drugs because reality sucks, If you want people to stop doing drugs change reality.
― Frank Zappa
Easy FDR. Massive publics works program, introducing one of the most progressive VP's of all time Henry Wallace, introduced a second bill of rights which essentially promoted social democracy in America but unfortunately died before it had a chance.
Meh. I would say I voted for Obama. Never really been impressed with him, or "excited". If you mean "ashamed" as I will criticize the man, I mean either way I would be criticizing if McCain won or Romney won. They are clear corporatists.You are obviously just ashamed and embarrassed for having supported and voted for that worthless narcissistic lying empty suit.....TWICE
I mean for ****s sake, if Obama is some "far left" President, then ****, Eisenhower might as well be "far left" as well.
Hhhhhmmmmmmm....ssssuuuurrrrreeeee. Was FDR 'left' enough for you?
The Gruber-crat is strong in this one!
I never said China made high quality manufactured products, only that they we of comparable quality to those products built by high cost unionised US Labor. In the end, I would rather support those trying to recover from Socialism than those trying to force Socialism down my throat.
The only reason for anyone in the US to fear competition is because they know they are losers who cannot compete. Those who support Liberalism and other forms of socialism in the US fear competition because they are losers. Others simply accept the challenge and work to meet it.
Only a fool measures equality by results and not opportunities.
Apparently you don't understand that when I speak against the greenie-weenies and environmentalist political agenda that I am not against reasonable and firmly provable environmental protections. However, there is nothing "reasonable" about the EPA.
Not dumping chemicals into the water is reasonable. However, many of their agendas are not reasonable but socialistic in intention. Such as the clean air act and the EPAs push for government control of all fresh water.
The clean air act is so screwed up that it is illegal to change your vehicle to cleaner fuels or even to electric because it "alters the fuel system" and associated environmental equipment. It gives a means to enforce a "government knows best" ideology and cripples individual efforts of innovation.
If you ever worked in a safety office, then you would also realise that OSHA doesn't just enforce reasonable, common sense safety but creates metric tons of useless paperwork to show that a company has trained stupid people not to be stupid and to hold companies responsible should someone stupid do something stupid on the companies properties. In other words, it is not about safety, but about exerting greater government control.
Only a fool measures equality by results and not opportunities.
Agree and we should also require a right to organize labor and a reasonably representative/democratic government.
yep, i agree.
Because in the end on most things, there's a dimes thickness in difference between the elephant and the ass. You do know that the GOP is all about TPP, right?
Killing one person is murder, killing 100,000 is foreign policy
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote