• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Rubio tells donors he is running for White House

LOL....this is on the level of Navy Pride Rubbish. You don't even need to get beyond #1 to see that this is plain and simply crap. Where did you pull this one up....some right-wing chain mail propoganda site? Too funny.

This appears to be the source of your chainmail : About Karla Downing | Change My Relationship | Change My Relationship Considering that you worship some guy name Gruber...it doesn't surprise me that you would willy-nilly latch on to this woman's opinions as well. Par for the course.

Then prove it wrong? Tell me that the liberal agenda doesn't support the differences and prove it?
 
Do you understand where the population is located in California? Ever looked at the election results by county? I stand by my statement, the larger metropolitan areas are democrat controlled, bought, and paid for even in your state. The election map of California is mostly red except for LA, San Francisco and parts of San Diego. Your ignorance is staggering.

2012 Presidential Election Results - The Washington Post

Uh....if you new anything about California, you would know that most of the red areas are sparsely populated....just like the red states in general. Most people in this country tend to live in clusters around cities. Doh!
 
Then prove it wrong? Tell me that the liberal agenda doesn't support the differences and prove it?

Oh puh-lease.....the entire post is rubbish...pure trash. Sorry...but its a waste of time to sit and go through it with you. Suffice it to say, just like this woman (who apparently you worship in some crazy "Gruberisque" way)....I could write a similar one what would cast liberals in a positive light and trash conservatives. None of the points that your idol raises are even within the realm of reality....but then again...the fact that you eat it up doesn't surprise me in the least.
 
Uh....if you new anything about California, you would know that most of the red areas are sparsely populated....just like the red states in general. Most people in this country tend to live in clusters around cities. Doh!

Yes, populated in the big city and bought by the Democrat Party. Did Gruber talk to you before making his famous statement, just curious?
 
Oh puh-lease.....the entire post is rubbish...pure trash. Sorry...but its a waste of time to sit and go through it with you. Suffice it to say, just like this woman (who apparently you worship in some crazy "Gruberisque" way)....I could write a similar one what would cast liberals in a positive light and trash conservatives. None of the points that your idol raises are even within the realm of reality....but then again...the fact that you eat it up doesn't surprise me in the least.

Let's see, who wrote "It Takes a Village". Now waiting for you to prove the rest of the post wrong?
 
Yes, populated in the big city and bought by the Democrat Party. Did Gruber talk to you before making his famous statement, just curious?

Care to offer up anything to support your contention that voters are "bought by the Democrat Party"....or just typical Con blather?
 
As I said....you don't even need to go beyond #1 to see that your chain-email propoganda regurgitation is nothing but garbage.

There are plenty of Democrats who believe that a strong community is essential to raising a child. But there are equally strong numbers of Republicans that feel the same way. In fact, I think most people believe that it is important to have strong schools, churches, community organizations, sports teams to socialize and teach our children. Very few people, Republicans even, would support your contention that the only people who should have any influence on raising a child are the parents alone. But according to your new infatuation....that is the case.

Pure garbage.

Most parents I know....Liberal and Conservative want their friends parents to discipline our child if they are at their house and do something wrong. Liberals and Conservatives alike want to know from neighbors if our children are engaging in mischief that they shouldn't be. Liberals and Conservatives alike hope to live in neighborhoods where the neighbors are watching out for children playing in the neighborhood and keeping a check on any suspicious activity.

No Con....I don't believe for a second that Conservatives want people in the community to mind their own business and not play a role in looking out for their children. But you keep on drinking the kool-aid that your new "Gruber" infatuations is feeding you.
 

LOL....Seriously? Seriously? Your link says nothing about voters being "bought by the Democrat party". Is that your best attempt at trying to support your rhetoric? If so, you should stop now. As for your link...the entire premise of the article is that somehow because people move into cities they start voting Democrat and this is based on the reality that almost every major city is deep blue. That is the kind of leap in logic that is pretty representative of your arguments Con....but is just faulty logic.
 
As I said....you don't even need to go beyond #1 to see that your chain-email propoganda regurgitation is nothing but garbage.

There are plenty of Democrats who believe that a strong community is essential to raising a child. But there are equally strong numbers of Republicans that feel the same way. In fact, I think most people believe that it is important to have strong schools, churches, community organizations, sports teams to socialize and teach our children. Very few people, Republicans even, would support your contention that the only people who should have any influence on raising a child are the parents alone. But according to your new infatuation....that is the case.

Pure garbage.

Most parents I know....Liberal and Conservative want their friends parents to discipline our child if they are at their house and do something wrong. Liberals and Conservatives alike want to know from neighbors if our children are engaging in mischief that they shouldn't be. Liberals and Conservatives alike hope to live in neighborhoods where the neighbors are watching out for children playing in the neighborhood and keeping a check on any suspicious activity.

No Con....I don't believe for a second that Conservatives want people in the community to mind their own business and not play a role in looking out for their children. But you keep on drinking the kool-aid that your new "Gruber" infatuations is feeding you.

Your opinion noted, most people believe that the family, not the Federal Govt. are best suited to handle the schools and schools are state and local responsibilities not the Federal Govt. The post relates to the Federal Govt. not the state and local governments which are closer to the people. Big govt. liberals are people like you who always want the Federal Govt. to overturn state responsibility issues.
 
LOL....Seriously? Seriously? Your link says nothing about voters being "bought by the Democrat party". Is that your best attempt at trying to support your rhetoric? If so, you should stop now. As for your link...the entire premise of the article is that somehow because people move into cities they start voting Democrat and this is based on the reality that almost every major city is deep blue. That is the kind of leap in logic that is pretty representative of your arguments Con....but is just faulty logic.

Why do you think cities vote Democrat and the rural area doesn't? Bigger concentration of people gives bureaucrats more control and that is where the money goes. It isn't surprising that you don't understand that.
 
Your opinion noted, most people believe that the family, not the Federal Govt. are best suited to handle the schools and schools are state and local responsibilities not the Federal Govt. The post relates to the Federal Govt. not the state and local governments which are closer to the people. Big govt. liberals are people like you who always want the Federal Govt. to overturn state responsibility issues.

Nice attempt at doing the Con shuffle...but go back to your own post. Her claim is that Conservatives believe that parents alone should raise their children where "liberals" believe the community should raise their children. It says nothing about "The Federal Govt." or state or local governments. It is pure garbage and you swallowed it hook, line and sinker the way you swallow all right-wing propoganda. Until today....I didn't believe that you swallow these chain emails in the same way that Navy Pride does....but you just proved to all that you actually do.
 
Why do you think cities vote Democrat and the rural area doesn't? Bigger concentration of people gives bureaucrats more control and that is where the money goes. It isn't surprising that you don't understand that.

Demographics also show that the higher the education level, the more likely one is to vote Democrat. Most college educated people live in cities. People who live in cities also tend to be exposed to more diverse lifestyles and views which generally means higher Democratic voting. Also, almost 1/2 of the country are now "minorities" who tend to vote in large percentages with the Democratic party because the Democratic party's platform is more in line with their beliefs.

The idea that a conservative voter is going to move to a city and start voting Democrat because of some magical blue substance turns them into Democrats is just silly. More likely, if they change at all, it will be because living in a rural area they were not exposed to other ideas and the diversity that large cities offer. If they change their mind, its probably more likely that they did so because they have a change in their beliefs, not because some phantom Democrat pays for their vote. That is just silly rhetoric.
 
Nice attempt at doing the Con shuffle...but go back to your own post. Her claim is that Conservatives believe that parents alone should raise their children where "liberals" believe the community should raise their children. It says nothing about "The Federal Govt." or state or local governments. It is pure garbage and you swallowed it hook, line and sinker the way you swallow all right-wing propoganda. Until today....I didn't believe that you swallow these chain emails in the same way that Navy Pride does....but you just proved to all that you actually do.

You really don't pay much attention do you, everything in this post is about the Federal Govt. and its role, not the state and local governments. You telling me that the Democrats today believe in the states and local government's running their own communities? You really are very naïve, gullible, and poorly informed but then again you live in California, the worst economic disaster in the nation looking for a federal bailout.
 
Demographics also show that the higher the education level, the more likely one is to vote Democrat. Most college educated people live in cities. People who live in cities also tend to be exposed to more diverse lifestyles and views which generally means higher Democratic voting. Also, almost 1/2 of the country are now "minorities" who tend to vote in large percentages with the Democratic party because the Democratic party's platform is more in line with their beliefs.

The idea that a conservative voter is going to move to a city and start voting Democrat because of some magical blue substance turns them into Democrats is just silly. More likely, if they change at all, it will be because living in a rural area they were not exposed to other ideas and the diversity that large cities offer. If they change their mind, its probably more likely that they did so because they have a change in their beliefs, not because some phantom Democrat pays for their vote. That is just silly rhetoric.

Wow, talk about being brainwashed and using skewed statistics! Your opinion noted and your statement biased, partisan and totally skewed. Spoken like a good little liberal minion that ignores fly over country and reality. Don't have to go far to find voter fraud, just look at the big cities.
 
Wow, talk about being brainwashed and using skewed statistics! Your opinion noted and your statement biased, partisan and totally skewed. Spoken like a good little liberal minion that ignores fly over country and reality. Don't have to go far to find voter fraud, just look at the big cities.

Cue the twilight zone theme.......
 

LOL....I never took you for a wacko conspiracy guy, guess your foil hat was never showing until recently. I got through about 2 paragraphs of your link until I couldn't control my laughter and had to stop reading. Where do you come up with this ridiculous crap? "Polls showed Romney winning"? Wh-wh-wh-what? There wasn't a single poll showing Romney winning, even FoxNews polling didn't have Romney winning. You really need to stop relying on this right-wing propoganda as the source of your information. You are probably one of those voters that was SHOCKED by the 2012 election results despite the fact that pretty much every major poll had Obama 8-10 points ahead going into election day.
 
LOL....I never took you for a wacko conspiracy guy, guess your foil hat was never showing until recently. I got through about 2 paragraphs of your link until I couldn't control my laughter and had to stop reading. Where do you come up with this ridiculous crap? "Polls showed Romney winning"? Wh-wh-wh-what? There wasn't a single poll showing Romney winning, even FoxNews polling didn't have Romney winning. You really need to stop relying on this right-wing propoganda as the source of your information. You are probably one of those voters that was SHOCKED by the 2012 election results despite the fact that pretty much every major poll had Obama 8-10 points ahead going into election day.

You really are very naïve, gullible, and poorly informed. Doesn't matter what is posted because you have way too much invested in a failed liberal ideology where everyone else but you is wrong. Liberalism is close to sainthood, never wrong which is why of course we don't have any problems at all in our country today. Thanks for all you do to make society better. How are things in Disneyland's "Its a small world?"

8 trillion added to the debt in 6 plus years, historically high U-6, continued record high discouraged workers and part time employees, economic growth due to govt spending of taxpayer dollars-- a true liberal success story. You are getting your wish, a massive central govt. that takes on personal responsibility issues
 

Serious Question Con - Have you ever read a right-wing propogandist that you didn't automatically put your complete faith and trust in? It seems you latch onto these chain emails and have an overwhelming desire to start spouting it as if it is the word of God...without really taking a minute to realize how ridiculous and full of garbage these links are.
 
You really are very naïve, gullible, and poorly informed. Doesn't matter what is posted because you have way too much invested in a failed liberal ideology where everyone else but you is wrong. Liberalism is close to sainthood, never wrong which is why of course we don't have any problems at all in our country today. Thanks for all you do to make society better. How are things in Disneyland's "Its a small world?"

8 trillion added to the debt in 6 plus years, historically high U-6, continued record high discouraged workers and part time employees, economic growth due to govt spending of taxpayer dollars-- a true liberal success story. You are getting your wish, a massive central govt. that takes on personal responsibility issues

If relying on right-wing chain email propoganda is your definition of what makes a person not naive or guillible....then I guess that just about explains everything.
 
Serious Question Con - Have you ever read a right-wing propogandist that you didn't automatically put your complete faith and trust in? It seems you latch onto these chain emails and have an overwhelming desire to start spouting it as if it is the word of God...without really taking a minute to realize how ridiculous and full of garbage these links are.

I buy results, verifiable results. How do you explain more people voting in a Cleveland, Ohio District than actually live there? How do you explain Obama getting 90-95 of the minority vote? Do dead people vote in your city like they do in Chicago?

Now a question to you, why do you continue to buy the liberal rhetoric and ignore the liberal results??
 
I buy results, verifiable results. How do you explain more people voting in a Cleveland, Ohio District than actually live there? How do you explain Obama getting 90-95 of the minority vote? Do dead people vote in your city like they do in Chicago?

Now a question to you, why do you continue to buy the liberal rhetoric and ignore the liberal results??

See....that's the problem Con...you talk a big game about "results matter"...but you always get exposed for your empty rhetoric.

When you rely on chain emails and right-wing propoganda for your information and latch onto every infatuation like it is the word of God, you are likely to get burned...or at least get bad information.

Case in point: The 108% Ohio Obama Voter Fraud Myth and the Recount Petition - US News
 
See....that's the problem Con...you talk a big game about "results matter"...but you always get exposed for your empty rhetoric.

When you rely on chain emails and right-wing propoganda for your information and latch onto every infatuation like it is the word of God, you are likely to get burned...or at least get bad information.

Case in point: The 108% Ohio Obama Voter Fraud Myth and the Recount Petition - US News

BGSU is south of Toledo, not part of Cleveland. Stop acting like a third world country person and actually do some research.
 
Do you understand where the population is located in California? Ever looked at the election results by county? I stand by my statement, the larger metropolitan areas are democrat controlled, bought, and paid for even in your state. The election map of California is mostly red except for LA, San Francisco and parts of San Diego. Your ignorance is staggering.

2012 Presidential Election Results - The Washington Post

Of course, we shouldn't let those people vote...
 
Back
Top Bottom