• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Rubio tells donors he is running for White House

In case you weren't paying attention (obviously).....I was responding to his racist post. Doh!

Sure you was.....Kinda hard to respond to him when you were talking to another poster about Him. :doh
 

Well, let us say this presidential election, what will happen in 2020, 2024, 2028, 2032, 2036 presidential elections is everybody's guess but in 2016 he will never become the republican candidate (especially not if they were planning to have a chance to win ;) ).
 
I said nothing of the sort, and you continuing to insist that I did shows that you're simply a blatant, delusional liar.

So you won't own your posts. Fine with me.



No, everyone is responsible for his/her own actions. Bill being a horndog and seeking gratification outside the marriage is entirely on him. It's not Hillary's fault whatosever. Having marital problems is a separate issue from infidelity.

First, don't edit my posts. Second, I've been married and divorced twice. I know a thing or two about failed marriages, and since you're taking such a silly position, I'm quite comfortable asserting that you apparently don't know squat about it.
 
So you won't own your posts. Fine with me.

I own everything I said, which resembles nothing of what you accused me of saying. Lying makes baby Jesus cry.

First, don't edit my posts.

I don't have the ability to edit your posts.

Second, I've been married and divorced twice. I know a thing or two about failed marriages, and since you're taking such a silly position, I'm quite comfortable asserting that you apparently don't know squat about it.

You are an expert in your marriage, your problems, assuming you have any insight into you own behavior. That's where your expertise begins and ends.
 
Seriously? Two term senator and secretary of state? And don't discount the position of first lady. What are you smoking?

All of which she failed miserably and earned solely on her convenient husband's name.

She might as well be playing quarterback for the Washington Redskins.
 
I own everything I said, which resembles nothing of what you accused me of saying. Lying makes baby Jesus cry.

Sure you do.



I don't have the ability to edit your posts.

Everybody can truncate another's post when responding. It's a form of editing. Some call it taking quotes out of context.



You are an expert in your marriage, your problems, assuming you have any insight into you own behavior. That's where your expertise begins and ends.

You have no idea what I might know about such things. I also have some insight into exactly what you don't know by your own remarks.
 
Sure you was.....Kinda hard to respond to him when you were talking to another poster about Him. :doh

Seriously dude.....if you are going to comment....please know what you are talking about first or take the time to educate yourself before spouting off. If you were following along, you would have seen that I responded to NP's post and then Tres Borrachos responded to my post to which I responded. See....that's kinda the way these message boards work. Next time.....pay attention.
 
I don't know why Obama speaks on anything, or Hillary. I can't stand either of them.

I'm asking you, why do YOU think that a president should have any business in education?

Not sure what you mean by having any "business in education" can the president speak out about education, yes. There is no gag order on a president speaking his views on any subject that I know of. I think we still have free speech in this country and that would apply to the president as well. Beyond speaking on the subject you need to clarify what "business in education" means. You have plenty of examples that you can point to with Obama alone, I listed just a few, but there is treasure chest of sites that show Obama's involvement or not in education. Then you can point to specifics of what you don't agree with what Obama has done that fits your description of "having business in education"
 
I am pretty sure I did not mention Jeb Bush as someone with little or no chance of winning the nomination? At least how it stands yet.

And do you really think that, for example, Rick "liar liar pants on fire" Santorum has a snowballs chance in hell of winning the republican nomination or winning the presidency? I think not.

Rick is just one of all the candidates you ruled out, I mean you ruled out all of them, thus there is no republican nomination. Of course all the Dems have anointed Hillery and you ruled out all the the republicans. That leaves Hillery the anointed one, no further discussion necessary.
 
Everybody can truncate another's post when responding. It's a form of editing. Some call it taking quotes out of context.

You accused me of editing your posts -- another lie. I'm seeing a pattern. If I wish only to respond to a portion of your nonsense, I will do so.

You have no idea what I might know about such things.

I know for a fact that you have no more insight into the Clintons' marriage than I do.
 
Rick is just one of all the candidates you ruled out, I mean you ruled out all of them, thus there is no republican nomination. Of course all the Dems have anointed Hillery and you ruled out all the the republicans. That leaves Hillery the anointed one, no further discussion necessary.

Didn't rule out Jeb Bush.
 
You accused me of editing your posts -- another lie. I'm seeing a pattern. If I wish only to respond to a portion of your nonsense, I will do so.

You don't know anything about editing either. Look it up. You need to. Deletion is a form of editing.



I know for a fact that you have no more insight into the Clintons' marriage than I do.

You and facts aren't friends.
 
Well, that's yet another candidate that is vastly more qualified than the clueless old bag the Democrats will put forth.

Exactly, Hillary? Biden? Warren? But then again the majority voted for Obama so anything can happen to continue to support the Gruber claim that the electorate is ignorant. Seems that the liberals will continue to ignore results and buy the leftwing rhetoric. Obama should be enough to make Democrats never vote again based upon emotion.
 
You accused me of editing your posts -- another lie. I'm seeing a pattern. If I wish only to respond to a portion of your nonsense, I will do so.



I know for a fact that you have no more insight into the Clintons' marriage than I do.

I'm not finished with the second part here. You are claiming that Bill is responsible for his infidelities, and you'll get no disagreement from me on that. You will, however get strong disagreement from me regarding Hillary's role in it. Understand, Bill has been unfaithful for decades, and it is well known. Certainly known by Hillary. She willfully engaged in cover ups of this stuff. Why? Because Bill's infidelity was secondary to her political ambitions. She was an enabler. By helping to conceal such actions, she suborned truth - not to mention outright lying. There was no vast right-wing conspiracy during the Lewinsky affair unless you consider an elected congress a conspiracy. This is her willful lying and placing the sanctity of her marriage in a secondary position to her other desires, and that's enough for me and anybody else with an ounce of common sense to understand that she certainly has a role in the whole damn thing. When any person attempts to conceal or mitigate the moral failures of another, that person is an enabler. She played her part.
 
I'm not finished with the second part here. You are claiming that Bill is responsible for his infidelities, and you'll get no disagreement from me on that. You will, however get strong disagreement from me regarding Hillary's role in it.

SNIP

No, Bill is responsible for HIS OWN ACTIONS. It's called personal responsibility. Look into it. The end.
 
SNIP

No, Bill is responsible for HIS OWN ACTIONS. It's called personal responsibility. Look into it. The end.

Please tell me why anyone would vote for Hillary? What exactly are her accomplishments, not the titles she has held but the results generated?
 
Please tell me why anyone would vote for Hillary? What exactly are her accomplishments, not the titles she has held but the results generated?

I'm not advocating that anyone vote for Hillary. You're barking up the wrong tree here. The election is going to be a competition between which is the worst option, not which is the best.
 
I'm not advocating that anyone vote for Hillary. You're barking up the wrong tree here. The election is going to be a competition between which is the worst option, not which is the best.

I cannot see a worse option than Hillary other than another Obama term. Why would anyone vote for her? That is the question that no one can answer especially those who voted for Obama with the resume he had.
 
I cannot see a worse option than Hillary other than another Obama term. Why would anyone vote for her? That is the question that no one can answer especially those who voted for Obama with the resume he had.

What you have to worry about is why anyone would vote for your favored candidate.
 
What you have to worry about is why anyone would vote for your favored candidate.

You have a very accurate leaning, qualification and results matter little to people like you.
 
You have a very accurate leaning, qualification and results matter little to people like you.

Even if that were true, which it isn't, that has nothing to do with anything I said.
 
What you said has nothing to do with the content of my post as you made it about me.

I didn't mention you anymore than you mentioned me. You asked me why anyone would vote for Clinton (something I never promoted), and I asked you why anyone would vote for your candidate of choice. Seems to me that we're about done here.
 
I didn't mention you anymore than you mentioned me. You asked me why anyone would vote for Clinton (something I never promoted), and I asked you why anyone would vote for your candidate of choice. Seems to me that we're about done here.

The candidate of my choice will be qualified and with a record to run on, a positive one including not promoting ideas like this one

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1DS2wXSKF5k
 
The candidate of my choice will be qualified and with a record to run on, a positive one including not promoting ideas like this one

Your candidate of choice will be an also-ran Republican who probably can't beat Hillary.
 
Back
Top Bottom