What bearing does the situation on Tulsa have to do with the topic here, a shooting in South Carolina?Originally Posted by SMTA
What bearing does the situation on Tulsa have to do with the topic here, a shooting in South Carolina?
Maybe the fact that some moron might have been posting in the wrong thread.......oops.
Greatness lies not in being strong, but in the right use of strength - Henry Ward Beecher
Baby sister, I was born game and I intend to go out that way - Rooster Cogburn
And so, after pages and pages of "iLOL" and condescension from you to defend killing an unarmed man, Michael Slager pleaded guilty to having “used deadly force even though it was objectively unreasonable under the circumstances.”All the above shows you not paying attention to what you yourself quoted.
Again; "... the X26 once discharged can use the prongs to tase again."
Did you not understand that?
Did you not see the image provided of the X26?
The suspect taking the X26 made him a significant threat.
iLOL No, it doesn't disprove any thing.
Since you think it does here is your chance. Prove it.
Please provide each item you think it disproves so I can dispel these false beliefs.
Your sarcasm is unwarranted.
You are quibbling over the specific wording while ignoring what is being spoken about.
It is being insinuated that the Police lied about the assistance they provided.
From his interview.
Witness Who Filmed Police Shooting Says Victim Walter Scott Didn't Fight for Taser Video - ABC News
@ 02:18
Q: At any point did you see anyone attempting to resuscitate him, save his life?
A: (much is garbled) like I said, the only thing I saw after the scene, there was a cop who, the back up cop, um, he put his glove, he lift down on the shirt of the victim he decided no looking at the um, at wound of the, of the bullet and (garbled) pulse of the victim
after that no I stay there for a little bit, not a long, maybe for a few minutes.
Q: So you didn't see anyone perform CPR?
A: I didn't see any CPR.
Q: Try breathing into his mouth?
A: No, no.
Q: Compress his chest?
A: Nothing.
Q: Try to revive him?
A: Nothing like that.
What he is speaking about in the interview came prior to what the image from his own video later shows.
This is what he was speaking about.
But for some reason he conveniently leaves out the actual assistance later being provided that his own video shows.
While he may not have been there when they were actually performing CPR, when he says they did "nothing" he is not being truthful, as the image shows they were involved in assistance. Such assistance is an effort to save his life, which is what he was asked.
While possible, it is unlikely that he didn't understand the totality of what he was being asked.
And the fact that he said the suspect definitely did not grab the taser when we can see he had, just further makes what he says suspect.
He will now go forward to sentencing, probably for 2nd degree murder.
1. iLOL Hilarious.
Nothing I argued has been wrong.
It is why he got a hung jury. And that Jury was hung on the lessor charge of ‘voluntary manslaughter’, not the murder charge.
2. His receiving bad counsel, being broken by the system, or a combination of both, does not negate any argument I previously made.
So your post is as nonsensical as it is silly in regards to your comments about me.
3. As for your quip about probably being sentenced for 2nd degree murder? iLOL No.
He was not convicted of such.
I am sure you took away from the report exactly what the author wanted you to think, but no, sentencing guidelines that are "in effect" equivalent to does not mean for. Duh!
That said.
Matter of fact, he will never be convicted of murder or manslaughter.
From the article.
The plea deal effectively resolves all of the pending charges against Mr. Slager, 35, who had also been indicted on a charge of murder in state court.
Try again.
“The law is reason, free from passion.”
❈ Aristotle ❈
(≚ᄌ≚)
Yeah, you were right (in your mind) but he pleaded guilty. You are deluded and arrogant which makes how wrong you are all the more funny.
You just keep turning up on these threads and pretending murder by police when it happens isn't murder and I'll just keep laughing at you.
Look at all the nonsense you are speaking out of arrogance. iLOL
1. The jury chose not to go with murder. They hung on manslaughter. Do you not understand that?
Nothing you provided says my arguments were wrong.
2. He is no longer charged with murder. Do you really not understand that?
That is what the article you provided makes very clear, but for some reason you can't accept that and instead want to arrogantly criticize me when you are iin the wrong with your claims.
That is hilarious.
Again.
Matter of fact, he will never be convicted of murder or manslaughter.
From the article.
The plea deal effectively resolves all of the pending charges against Mr. Slager, 35, who had also been indicted on a charge of murder in state court.
“The law is reason, free from passion.”
❈ Aristotle ❈
(≚ᄌ≚)
He pleaded guilty. He knows better what he did than you do.
End of story.
Moderator's Warning: Necro'd thread closed.
I have an answer for everything...you may not like the answer or it may not satisfy your curiosity..but it will still be an answer. ~ Kal'Stang
My mind and my heart are saying I'm in my twenties. My body is pointing at my mind and heart and laughing its ass off. ~ Kal'Stang
Oy vey! Your argumentation is stupid.
He plead to a civil rights violation, not to murder. Do you really not understand that?
“The law is reason, free from passion.”
❈ Aristotle ❈
(≚ᄌ≚)
Posting Permissions
