Which doesn't change the fact that you have not refuted what has been presented.
Clearly you can not refute what I presented, nor could you, which is why you focus on me and not on what was provided.
As an appeal to authority as well as an appeal to assumed masses, you are again engaged in a logical fallacy.
In accordance with the evidence he clearly did not commit a murder, and all you have done is ignore the evidence.
Your continued use of logical fallacies do not refute what I presented.
Funny that you think they do.