• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Rand Paul announces presidential run

You have an interesting definition of the word force, that barista at Bertolinis wouldn't make me a cup of coffee, then I forced him to do it by paying the price on the board ......

The Feds can provide funding for the accomplishment of certain goals. Public health and education are worth funding

Whenever a state takes monies from the federal government, there are a boatload of regulations attached. Depending on who is in control of Congress/White House those regulations can differ greatly. It is better for a state to be in control of such things. It is closest to the people they serve. They would be hawks on waste and fraud and know precisely where the monies are greatly needed instead of following some same size fits all programs by the federal government that do not best serve the people.
 
Say what.....the only ones that need to lose is the Democratic Party, and Right now they have never been this weak since the Civil War. Time to help them divide up. That game they know so well.

No, they both need to lose. They have both ruined the democratic system.
 
Whenever a state takes monies from the federal government, there are a boatload of regulations attached. Depending on who is in control of Congress/White House those regulations can differ greatly. It is better for a state to be in control of such things. It is closest to the people they serve. They would be hawks on waste and fraud and know precisely where the monies are greatly needed instead of following some same size fits all programs by the federal government that do not best serve the people.

If you recall, the President offered a waiver exempting States of Federal regulations tied to TANF funding IF they could come up with a working and proven model to replace them that met or exceeded results under Federal rules. Do you know how many States ultimately took up that offer?
 
If you recall, the President offered a waiver exempting States of Federal regulations tied to TANF funding IF they could come up with a working and proven model to replace them that met or exceeded results under Federal rules. Do you know how many States ultimately took up that offer?

So the President told them if they could out socialize him, then he wouldnt force them to comply? Thats a fair offer?
 
As of today, paul would have my vote. Im not sure if he could beat hillary or any other democrat. It all comes down to who is promising the ignorant masses their piiece of the public coffers
 
Back
Top Bottom