• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Iranians See Victory, Hope for New Image in Nuclear Agreement

The Iranians said the Destruction of Israel is a Non negotiable part of this deal.

Obama's Ok with that
 
Even people of nominal intelligence should realize that even if this nuclear agreement is signed, state-sponsored terrorism, human-right's violations etc are still major issues with Iran.

Party on!
 
Even people of nominal intelligence should realize that even if this nuclear agreement is signed, state-sponsored terrorism, human-right's violations etc are still major issues with Iran.

Party on!

Shhhhh...we're not supposed to mention that.

This is Obama's last chance at a meaningful legacy and we need to support the little leftist pinheads attempt to qualify this as some major foreign policy success.

They're pretty desperate after ObamaCare flamded out.
 
Even people of nominal intelligence should realize that even if this nuclear agreement is signed, state-sponsored terrorism, human-right's violations etc are still major issues with Iran.

Party on!

Certainly Iran has human rights issues, but are you suggesting they should be tied to a deal on their nuclear power. Btw, "this nuclear agreement" doesn't exist. There's a frame for a deal. Like a picture frame, it's not the picture, it's the boundaries of the picture.
 
Certainly Iran has human rights issues, but are you suggesting they should be tied to a deal on their nuclear power. Btw, "this nuclear agreement" doesn't exist. There's a frame for a deal. Like a picture frame, it's not the picture, it's the boundaries of the picture.

I know ...I was trying to be diplomatic like Obama. ;)
 
Certainly Iran has human rights issues, but are you suggesting they should be tied to a deal on their nuclear power. Btw, "this nuclear agreement" doesn't exist. There's a frame for a deal. Like a picture frame, it's not the picture, it's the boundaries of the picture.

Lol !!

Yes, Iran's motivations are purely centered around " Energy "....Wow.

Did you realize that in America and even in Russian ths Fuel Rods used in Nuclear Power applications are now and have been for some time manufactured from decommisioned Nuclear weapons ?

Yep ! So I guess Iran's plan is to make Nuclear weapons, decommission them and then turn the Uranium " pits " into fuel rods ! Lol.

Its funny because thats something Obama and the Democrats would probably support 100 percent, while they ignored the fact that Iran is the leading state sponsor of terror.
 
Lol !!

Yes, Iran's motivations are purely centered around " Energy "....Wow.

Did you realize that in America and even in Russian ths Fuel Rods used in Nuclear Power applications are now and have been for some time manufactured from decommisioned Nuclear weapons ?

Yep ! So I guess Iran's plan is to make Nuclear weapons, decommission them and then turn the Uranium " pits " into fuel rods ! Lol.

Its funny because thats something Obama and the Democrats would probably support 100 percent, while they ignored the fact that Iran is the leading state sponsor of terror.

Specialists disagree with you.

(Washington, D.C.)--A group of 30 leading nuclear nonproliferation specialists, primarily from the United States, issued a joint statement today assessing the framework deal announced by the P5+1 and Iran on April 2 as a "vitally important step forward" for nonproliferation and international security.

The P5+1 Nuclear Agreement With Iran: A Net-Plus for Nonproliferation | Arms Control Association
 
Your own damn article stated clearly that they were celebrating the defeat of the United States and they are correct this is a victory for the Mullahs and a defeat for the free world in that they have just been handed the bomb.

The notion that the U.S. has been defeated and that Iran has been handed a nuclear weapon is no more than filthy deceit.
 
Even people of nominal intelligence should realize that even if this nuclear agreement is signed, state-sponsored terrorism, human-right's violations etc are still major issues with Iran.
US sanctions against Iran for terrorism related issues are not affected by the nuclear negotiations. These will remain in place.
 
Simpleχity;1064507265 said:
US sanctions against Iran for terrorism related issues are not affected by the nuclear negotiations. These will remain in place.

So technically, given they could make dirty bombs or other WMDs, they would be nearly as much a threat to others.
 
We do have a knack for pleasing our enemies and angering our allies, don't we? It is a curious thing to do.
 
Specialists disagree with you.

(Washington, D.C.)--A group of 30 leading nuclear nonproliferation specialists, primarily from the United States, issued a joint statement today assessing the framework deal announced by the P5+1 and Iran on April 2 as a "vitally important step forward" for nonproliferation and international security.

The P5+1 Nuclear Agreement With Iran: A Net-Plus for Nonproliferation | Arms Control Association

" Specialist " ??? LOL !!!!

Yes, the leading State sponsor of Terror should be allowed to continue on with their Uranium enrichment for " Peaceful purposes " when Counties like the US and Russia now use the Fissile material from decommisioned Nuclear weapons to manufacture their fuel rods.

So Iran is going to build Nuclear weapons, and then immediately decommission them and manufacture their fuel rods for " Peaceful purposes ", right ?
 
Last edited:
" Specialist " ??? LOL !!!!

Yes, the leading State sponsor of Terror should be allowed to continue on with their Uranium enrichment for " Peaceful purposes " when Counties like the US and Russia now use the Fissile material from decommisioned Nuclear weapons to manufacture their fuel rods.

So Iran is going to build Nuclear weapons, and then immediately decommission them and manufacture their fuel rods for " Peaceful purposes ", right ?

Really. You don't believe that there are specialists. There's the lol.
 
Certainly Iran has human rights issues, but are you suggesting they should be tied to a deal on their nuclear power. Btw, "this nuclear agreement" doesn't exist. There's a frame for a deal. Like a picture frame, it's not the picture, it's the boundaries of the picture.

The lifting of sanctions should certainly be tied to their support of terrorism.
 
The lifting of sanctions should certainly be tied to their support of terrorism.

Well then, if sanctions should be imposed upon nations that sponsor terrorism, we need to sanction Saudi Arabia, Israel, ha, even ourselves.
 
Are there any details to the incredibly broad statement? Is he talking about military bases?



OMG, dude is saying that he wants to have "STRICT LIMITS" and you want to ask regarding "Where"? /facepalm


obama says there is a famework in place, this dude says "**** off"?


How dem negotiations with your fascist friends going now? :lol:
 
There isn't any agreement. The Iranians disavowed it within hours of it's announcement by claiming that the US was lying about it.

So the good news is we get exactly what you wanted-nothing!

That's gonna make Israel safe.
 
" Specialist " ??? LOL !!!!

Yes, the leading State sponsor of Terror should be allowed to continue on with their Uranium enrichment for " Peaceful purposes " when Counties like the US and Russia now use the Fissile material from decommisioned Nuclear weapons to manufacture their fuel rods.

So Iran is going to build Nuclear weapons, and then immediately decommission them and manufacture their fuel rods for " Peaceful purposes ", right ?

Well, with no deal they certainly will. Wasn't that the Republican strategy all along?
 
Are there any details to the incredibly broad statement? Is he talking about military bases?

Khamenei has stated that military sites would be off-limits to international inspectors. From The New York Times:

Iran’s supreme leader on Thursday challenged two of the United States’ bedrock principles in the nuclear negotiations, declaring that all economic sanctions would have to be lifted on the day any final agreement is signed and that military sites would be strictly off limits to foreign inspectors.

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/10/world/middleeast/iran-khamenei-rouhani-nuclear-agreement.html

If Iran insists on such a position, it would cripple a very important component of verification, as Iran would have carved out a "safe harbor" from which it could engage in prohibited nuclear activities. IMO, if Iran is genuinely serious about the peaceful purpose of its nuclear activities, it should permit inspections that could be conducted anytime and anywhere.

Whether or not Khamenei is posturing remains to be seen. If he's serious about the above position on inspections, the P5+1 should reject any agreement, on account of a lack of verifiability.
 
Well, with no deal they certainly will. Wasn't that the Republican strategy all along?

No a better strategy is to PRETEND there's a deal, LIE about rhe framework and then tell Americans how awesome the Obama administration is.

Seems to be John Kerry's stategy anyway.
 
No a better strategy is to PRETEND there's a deal, LIE about rhe framework and then tell Americans how awesome the Obama administration is.

Seems to be John Kerry's stategy anyway.

So what is the RW strategy? Assuming President Romney, what would he be doing about Iran? Wagging his finger menacingly?

You didn't want a deal, and there you go. No deal. Which doesn't make Iran further away from a nuclear weapon.
 
Back
Top Bottom