- Joined
- Mar 7, 2011
- Messages
- 44,814
- Reaction score
- 20,221
- Location
- A very blue state
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Independent
MORE sanctions, less lies.
Wow, that was easy
Because the sanctions that we've had have worked to perfection?
MORE sanctions, less lies.
Wow, that was easy
Μολὼν λαβέ;1064518153 said:Obama is letting the cat out of the bag, not a Republican president. I don't know what's so difficult to understand about that either.
You have to ask? Bomb the **** out of them, of course.
The US is not the only "Game in Town", there are plenty of countries willing to do business with Iran. Russia & Iran are already concluding arms deals with more proposed in the future.
Briefly put more hypocritical & draconian measures by the US will only drive Iran to do business elsewhere.
Iran's complaint, all along has been made clear in their UN speeches. Sadly, few Americans have read complete & accurate translations of their very rational content.
Iran has gone along this far because of a fondness for America & the American people.
The problem with this, is that access to military sites (AKA the PMDS, Possible Military Dimensions) of Iran were never part of the P5+1 talks.... They are being handled directly by the IAEA, and Iran has provided 3 of the 5 areas to their PMD's.. It also doesnt help that the US military has stated that Iran gave up its military nuclear program in 2003.
Iran's military sites will never be open for inspection under a comprehensive nuclear deal with world powers, Iran's Tasnim news agency reported a senior Iranian commander as saying.
so "open access for UN inspectors, cept these few places"?
lol
Lets try this again: "The problem with this, is that access to military sites (AKA the PMDS, Possible Military Dimensions) of Iran were never part of the P5+1 talks.... They are being handled directly by the IAEA, and Iran has provided 3 of the 5 areas to their PMD's.. It also doesnt help that the US military has stated that Iran gave up its military nuclear program in 2003."
The two areas which the IAEA and Iran have not made an agreement on is information and explanations related to studies made and/or papers published in Iran in relation to neutron transport, and explosive tests. https://www.armscontrol.org/ACT/2014_10/News/IAEA-Reports-Delay-in-Iran-Probe2 areas..... why are 2 areas "off limits"?
And should we deal with them at all until this is fixed?
Report: US reporter held in Iran facing 'espionage' charges
The two areas which the IAEA and Iran have not made an agreement on is information and explanations related to studies made and/or papers published in Iran in relation to neutron transport, and explosive tests. https://www.armscontrol.org/ACT/2014_10/News/IAEA-Reports-Delay-in-Iran-Probe
Completely irrelevant because "we" are not negotiating with Iran in the area just discussed, the IAEA is.
So, when you claimed you supported "open inspections" you meant "partial".
yup...
Nuclear Facilities.
wait, are we negotiating military build up or not, you are all over the place....
Nope I am not. There are two negotiations going on. The P5+1 talks, and then there is Iran-IAEA talks. The IEAE-Iran talks are separate. The IAEA and Iran greed to resolve PMD investigation in a step by step manner.
*sigh*
It's all the same in the end, either we have access or not. and if not, is that enough to allow them to expand thier nuclear programs and help them militarize thier country moreso than it is already.
We have offered them a path to rejoin the international community but they would rather die so that the 12th imam can rise up and take over the Earth.
There is nothing rational about Iran's ratings.
Israel has never threatened its neighbors and only developed nuclear weapons long after they had been attacked over and over by the Arabs that want them all dead.
Why should the US or Israel leave Iran to create nuclear weapons when Iran's leaders call for death to America and promise to incinerate Israel as soon as they get a nuclear weapon??
So the leader of Iran chanting "Death to America" a couple of days ago was an expression of love for our people??
Not one rational person on the plant has difficulty understanding why the Iranians should not be allowed to have nuclear weapons when Iran is the greatest threat to world stability right now. Iran has its terrorist proxies fighting all over the Middle East witht eh stated goal to destroy Israel and America.
Its working to the same goal. Openness, transparency, and accountability. Are they the same? No.
Double BS.You haven't & couldn't credibly support one of your mistaken and / or false assertions many of which are based on false translations.
As far as a propensity for aggression, Iran has attacked no one in 300 years
while Prime Minister Menachem Begin admitted that Israel started 3 of its Wars in a speech to the Israeli National Defense College on Aug. 8, 1982,
I can't find a SINGLE Legitimate source for this quote.B'smith said:Since then Israel has repeatedly attacked Gaza & S. Lebanon using its frequently used "Provoke-then-Smash" strategy:
"Our strategy was always to provoke the Arabs and get an appropriate response so we could attack and smash them".
[Israeli General Moshe Dayan; diaries]
Not so Happy New Year! New Years (p49)
which ain't happening.
Double BS.
1. That's a Mischaracterization of Begins speech:
1982 M Begin Speech.
NY Times:
EXCERPTS FROM BEGIN SPEECH AT NATIONAL DEFENSE COLLEGE - NYTimes.com
The War of Independence
"I will explain why: We had Three wars which we fought withOut an alternative. The first was the war of independence, which began on Nov. 30, 1947, and lasted until January 1949...."
2. Iran has only had it's Radical Revolutionary Govt since 1979. "300 Years" is Irrelevant and intentionally Obtuse.
Iran is involved in Several PROXY Wars (Incl Attacking Israel with Hezbollah), and controls 4 Middle East Capitals.
I believe I have already Busted you on the Above BS Previously.
I can't find a SINGLE Legitimate source for this quote.
All Google entries are Forum posts or the few Conspiracy websites they're copying. (like the crap you linked to.)
You keep saying/LYING that "you're not going to respond" but keep doing so to the INADEQUATE degree you can; as above.______________________
A source can be credible without having C.A.M.E.R.A.'s imprimatur & being on their "Approved" list
You're welcome to decide which irrefutable Facts are "is Irrelevant[/u] and intentionally Obtuse", just don't expect me to waste my time responding
I've repeatedly explained that there are many "Players" in the Region other than Iran. Hezbollah is only considered a "Terrorist" by 3 countries in the World
You've obviously oan.. as omitted passages where Begin admitted "....we had a choice....we attacked him (Nasser) etc.
Again, I'm not going to respond, again to your uncivil & distorted tantrums
Did you miss the framework?