- Joined
- Aug 28, 2008
- Messages
- 15,483
- Reaction score
- 8,227
- Location
- North Texas
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Conservative
What in the hell are we doing?
No they do not.
The powers that be in Iran don't want women to vote, drive, or show their faces in public, and they punish women for declaring rape. They'll also kill a homosexual person pretty much on sight.
But by all means, liberals are falling all over themselves to help them develop nuclear weapons.
I wish liberals were as tough on Iran as they are bakers and pizzeria owners for exercising their religious freedom as Christians.
The powers that be in Iran don't want women to vote, drive, or show their faces in public, and they punish women for declaring rape. They'll also kill a homosexual person pretty much on sight.
But by all means, liberals are falling all over themselves to help them develop nuclear weapons.
I wish liberals were as tough on Iran as they are bakers and pizzeria owners for exercising their religious freedom as Christians.
True, but they have to approve it.
Doesn't matter, they don't have to do anything, as the expiration for sanctions is Dec 31 2016.
That has nothing at all to do with a deal.
This is not a treaty.
In the words of Pat Buchanan "We could take care of Iran in an afternoon."
When Conservatives Tangle: Pat Buchanan Spars With 'Hysterical' Sean Hannity Over Iran | CNS News
Yes it doesYour link doesn't say that.
"...extending the breakout time..."
--At many of their facilities that the P5+1 was most concerned about, they have agreed to halt.--" ... agreeing to halt enrichment ..." wtf kind of nonsense is that?
OK... Glad you can count your months. Or are you seriously saying that Iran is now going to start moving forward with creating a nuclear bomb before June????And it does say breakout time is currently 3 months ... that would be June.
Yup. Its cuz OBAMA!This would be a good deal if it was was with Canada ... but this Iran.
They dragged it out to get to this point.
And that sanction section is silly.
:roll:Once they get a weapon, wtf do they care about sanctions.
This is not a treaty.
In his speech, Obama promised Iranian transparency. Hmmm........
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/03/w...lumn-region®ion=top-news&WT.nav=top-news&_r=0
Hmm, another 3 months.
Sanctions lifted as Iran complies?? Interesting - Complies to what?
What will Congress think?
The article states: Iran has agreed to not enrich uranium over 3.67 percent for at least 15 years.Yes it does
I realize that. Just pointing out the hypocrisy of where liberals direct all their energy.
The article states: Iran has agreed to not enrich uranium over 3.67 percent for at least 15 years.
That's not the same as halting it.
Heya JF. :2wave: Just enuff time for the Iranians to complete their agenda.
Well, one thing is for certain. Menendez the leading Democrat against BO's deal wont be there to speak out. He has been forced to step down.
If we REALLY think they're 2 or 3 months from building functioning nuclear weapons I don't think that there's anything we could do to stop them.
Here it is in its glory Jog. Bo says we got something.....we wont be going to war. He expressed that Congress should not take action. Looks like the Iranians are all full of grins. As this is described as informal for them.
Some in the media will call this a "deal." It's not. It's a face-saving, time-buying charade -- an implicit admission that years of repeatedly-extended negotiations have resulted in nothing concrete, with yet another deadline disappearing in the rearview mirror. Consider this tortured verbiage provided to the Associated Press:
Iran and six world powers have agreed on the outlines of an understanding to limit Iran's nuclear programs, officials told The Associated Press Thursday. Negotiations continued on a dispute over how much of it to make public. The officials spoke outside weeklong talks that have been twice extended past the March 31 deadline in an effort to formulate both a general statement of what has been accomplished and documents describing what needs to be done to meet a June 30 deadline for a final accord...The Iranians want any results from talks in the Swiss city of Lausanne described less as a deal and more of an informal understanding … Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov, who left Lausanne Tuesday, said the two sides were close, the Interfax news agency reported. There are "only a few steps left to take or, in some cases, even-half steps, and some things have already been agreed upon," he said. But as the talks dragged on, one Western official said early Thursday that they were "at a tough moment and the path forward is really unclear," adding that the idea of breaking talks off over Passover and Easter and resuming them next week had been informally raised. That was confirmed by another official...By blowing through self-imposed deadlines, President Barack Obama risks further antagonizing lawmakers in both parties who are poised to take their own action to upend a deal if they determine the administration has been too conciliatory.
So we have "outlines of an understanding" that allow the parties to keep on negotiating, with the Iranians (a) stressing that the agreement is informal and non-binding at this stage, and (b) lobbying to keep as many details -- to the extent that they exist at all -- private. The Guardian reports that this "understanding" will feature "secret parameters." So far, Iranian officials seem pretty excited about this "breakthrough:".....snip~
Buying Time: Iran Talks Produce Non-Binding 'Outlines of an Understanding' With Scant Details - Guy Benson
In his speech, Obama promised Iranian transparency. Hmmm........
The article states: Iran has agreed to not enrich uranium over 3.67 percent for at least 15 years.
That's not the same as halting it.
really?
you dont think if we had the resolve, we could stop that program?
a few bunker busters, and a few raids by seal teams with demo, and nothing would be left except ashes
but....we have to want to stop it......and it doesnt appear the man in charge wishes that
why? i dont know.....was hoping someone will eventually tell me why.....but maybe it is just above my pay grade
In his speech, Obama promised Iranian transparency. Hmmm........
In the words of Pat Buchanan "We could take care of Iran in an afternoon."
When Conservatives Tangle: Pat Buchanan Spars With 'Hysterical' Sean Hannity Over Iran | CNS News
Yes it does
"Iran’s breakout timeline – the time that it would take for Iran to acquire enough fissile
material for one weapon – is currently assessed to be 2 to 3 months. That timeline will be
extended to at least one year, for a duration of at least ten years, under this framework. "
--going from 2-3 months to ≥ 1 year is an extension--
--At many of their facilities that the P5+1 was most concerned about, they have agreed to halt.--
"Iran has agreed to not enrich uranium at its Fordow facility"
"Iran has agreed to not conduct research and development associated with uranium enrichment at Fordow"
" Iran will not build new enrichment facilities or heavy water reactors"
OK... Glad you can count your months. Or are you seriously saying that Iran is now going to start moving forward with creating a nuclear bomb before June????
Yup. Its cuz OBAMA!
:roll: