Worth noting, Democrats: President Trump will have a Pen and a Phone. #Precedent.
It's one of the beliefs they share with Muslim extremists. Birds of a feather, so to speak.
"Groups with guitars are on the way out, Mr. Epstein"
Dick Rowe, A & R man
So, does a black baker have to make a klan cake?
Does a northern Irish protestant have to make a pizza for a irish unification event?
Does a jewish baker have to bake a cake for a holocost denier?
I've been asking questions like this for days, but none of you seem to want to answer.
If you build an army of 100 lions and their leader is a dog, in any fight, the lions will die like a dog. But if you build an army of 100 dogs and their leader is a lion, all dogs will fight like a lion.
Artistic expression is speech for constitutional purposes. There could not be a clearer celebration of same-sex marriage than a same-sex wedding. Compelling a third party to make an artistic portrayal of that wedding, even though he did not want the job and strongly opposed same-sex marriage for religious or other reasons, would be compelling him to endorse it against his will. I don't think it's even a close call, in the case of an artist. It would violate the freedom of speech just as surely as laws violated it by forcing Jehovah's Witnesses to salute the flag, as in Barnette, or to display "Live Free or Die" on their license plates, as in Wooley.
Here is an amicus brief in the Elane Photography case that goes into this issue in detail. I think the authors have it exactly right.
Last edited by matchlight; 04-06-15 at 01:30 PM.