• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Question about Michael brown leads to beating

If the target is normally blacks, and this time it was white...why did they target him?

The main reason is that he looks soft. You all know what I mean by soft too. Some people have a look and walk that you know if you shoved them they will shove back hard. Then there are people who look soft and often walk with drooping shoulders and just appear defensive as a marshmallow. He is also sitting by himself. He is a perfect target for a coward punk.

Highly unlikely the punk would have attacked him if he didn't have at least two buddies to back him up.
 
If the target is normally blacks, and this time it was white...why did they target him?

Because he looked soft. Animals always target the weakest in the group.
 
So, you're of the opinion that they were simply targeting anyone who didn't look capable of fighting back effectively, and not necessarily white people?

Could be. That would make them cowards and not racists at least.

Absolutely! Coward is the perfect description.
 
It's not called racism. I believe that they are calling it "reparations". See, this is what "social justice" looks like.

:roll:

Childish.
 
Back
Top Bottom