1. How does it harm them?
2. On the contrary, it sounds like they expect special treatment, which is why they would like to be considered a "protected class."
3. As usual, some are going too far with this. Most people don't give a rat's behind about anyone else's love life until they witness a parade where everything and anything sexual is on display, including nudity. There are laws against things like that. Porn in public is usually not the best way to show people you are just an average citizen, IMO. They harm their own cause in the things they sometimes do, and it causes problems in society when they do.
Personally, I have no problem with people marrying anyone they wish, as long as age is considered.
A part of me enjoys the fact that I am being proven right, but another part of me is annoyed that even in the face of defeat of their argument for anti-discrimination laws liberals STILL refuse to admit they're wrong and have nothing to support their case for government force.
Last edited by Henrin; 03-31-15 at 09:16 PM.
Freedom of speech is not freedom from criticism.
"Progressives aren't really progressive. They're regressive, all the way back to Sodom and Gomorrah." - author unknown
"A woman is like a teabag, you never know how strong she is until she gets in hot water." - Eleanor Roosevelt
Keep your religion out of other people's marriages.
I'm all for individuals refusing to frequent individual businesses for whatever cause that has their panties in a wad. But states boycotting states, that's just stupid and partisan politics. Lord spare us from idiots with a cause.