its mutually exclusive......
so again.. why dont you go into a Muslim Cake maker and ask for a cake with bacon and a picture of Muhammad on it with men kissing..
let us know how it goes... and if they deny you you better make a major issue out of it.. your rights had been taken by the Muslims that denied it..
I thought this was funny, from your article:
He's tried to distance the RFRA from that issue by inviting the major proponents of the SSM ban to the signing and placed them within arm reach of the Gov. "Promise - this has nothing to do with teh gays. What those guys standing RIGHT THERE behind me said about it? Ignore it..... "Those three, with their connections to a vast network of conservative churches, led a failed effort last year to ban same-sex marriage in Indiana’s constitution. The governor has tried to distance the religious freedom legislation from that issue.
In the case of Blonde vs. Get Out, Inc., the judge may ask the question, if we do not allow discrimination based on something as arbitrary as skin color, why should we allow discrimination based on something so arbitrary as hair color? If the defendents have not answered that question, if there is no legitimate business interest in denying service to blondes, the court may very well (and likely will) rule in favor of the plaintiffs.
Now, you may disagree with this, but that doesn't stop it from happening.